Abstract
Boundaries between research and clinical practice blur in health research conducted by clinician-researchers. We describe a typology, of clinician-researcher dual-role tensions, with two overarching catalysts: (1) acting as a clinical resource for patient-participants and (2) forming researcher–participant relationships mirroring clinician–patient relationships. Using the typology as an analytic template we explored blurred boundaries in five illustrative, non-clinician, critical studies. Like clinician-researchers, critical researchers act in ways that promote rapport and relationships with their participants, which can blur boundaries. While clinician-researchers see tension between clinician and researcher roles, we ask what roles critical researchers attempt to distinguish: ethically minded citizen and researcher, socially conscious community member and researcher, or friend and researcher? Anticipating catalysts of dual-role tension may assist critical researchers in planning and conducting robust research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blythe, S., Wilkes, L., Jackson, D., & Halcomb, E. (2013). The challenges of being an insider in storytelling research. Nurse Researcher, 21(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.09.21.1.8.e333
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287526
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078515
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
Hay-Smith, E. J. C., Brown, M., Anderson, L., & Treharne, G. J. (2016). Once a clinician, always a clinician: A systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0203-6
Hodgson, P., Parker, A., & Seddon, T. (2006). Doing drugs research in the criminal justice system: Some notes from the field. Addiction Research & Theory, 14(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350500396854
Holland, J. (2007). Emotions and research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701541894
Lyons, A. C., & Chamberlain, K. (2006). Health psychology: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, W., & Irvine, A. (2008). I’m okay, you’re okay? Reflections on the well-being and ethical requirements of researchers and research participants in conducting qualitative fieldwork interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(4), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700403
Richman, K. A., Alexander, L. B., & True, G. (2012). Proximity, ethical dilemmas, and community research workers. AJOB Primary Research, 3(4), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.714837
Sinha, S. (2017). Ethical and safety issues in doing sex work research reflections from a field-based ethnographic study in Kolkata, India. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316669338
Stainton-Rogers, W. (1996). Critical approaches to health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 1(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539600100106
Yanos, P. T., & Ziedonis, D. M. (2006). The patient-oriented clinician-researcher: Advantages and challenges of being a double agent. Psychiatric Services, 57(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.2.249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hay-Smith, J., Brown, M., Anderson, L., Treharne, G.J. (2018). Blurred Researcher–Participant Boundaries in Critical Research: Do Non-clinicians and Clinicians Experience Similar Dual-Role Tensions?. In: Macleod, C., Marx, J., Mnyaka, P., Treharne, G. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74721-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74721-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74720-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74721-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)