Advertisement

Blurred Researcher–Participant Boundaries in Critical Research: Do Non-clinicians and Clinicians Experience Similar Dual-Role Tensions?

  • Jean Hay-SmithEmail author
  • Melanie Brown
  • Lynley Anderson
  • Gareth J. Treharne
Chapter
  • 621 Downloads

Abstract

Boundaries between research and clinical practice blur in health research conducted by clinician-researchers. We describe a typology, of clinician-researcher dual-role tensions, with two overarching catalysts: (1) acting as a clinical resource for patient-participants and (2) forming researcher–participant relationships mirroring clinician–patient relationships. Using the typology as an analytic template we explored blurred boundaries in five illustrative, non-clinician, critical studies. Like clinician-researchers, critical researchers act in ways that promote rapport and relationships with their participants, which can blur boundaries. While clinician-researchers see tension between clinician and researcher roles, we ask what roles critical researchers attempt to distinguish: ethically minded citizen and researcher, socially conscious community member and researcher, or friend and researcher? Anticipating catalysts of dual-role tension may assist critical researchers in planning and conducting robust research.

References

  1. Blythe, S., Wilkes, L., Jackson, D., & Halcomb, E. (2013). The challenges of being an insider in storytelling research. Nurse Researcher, 21(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.09.21.1.8.e333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hay-Smith, E. J. C., Brown, M., Anderson, L., & Treharne, G. J. (2016). Once a clinician, always a clinician: A systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0203-6
  6. Hodgson, P., Parker, A., & Seddon, T. (2006). Doing drugs research in the criminal justice system: Some notes from the field. Addiction Research & Theory, 14(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350500396854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holland, J. (2007). Emotions and research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701541894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lyons, A. C., & Chamberlain, K. (2006). Health psychology: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitchell, W., & Irvine, A. (2008). I’m okay, you’re okay? Reflections on the well-being and ethical requirements of researchers and research participants in conducting qualitative fieldwork interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(4), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Richman, K. A., Alexander, L. B., & True, G. (2012). Proximity, ethical dilemmas, and community research workers. AJOB Primary Research, 3(4), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.714837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sinha, S. (2017). Ethical and safety issues in doing sex work research reflections from a field-based ethnographic study in Kolkata, India. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316669338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stainton-Rogers, W. (1996). Critical approaches to health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 1(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539600100106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yanos, P. T., & Ziedonis, D. M. (2006). The patient-oriented clinician-researcher: Advantages and challenges of being a double agent. Psychiatric Services, 57(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.2.249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Hay-Smith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Melanie Brown
    • 1
  • Lynley Anderson
    • 1
  • Gareth J. Treharne
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations