Skip to main content

Using Modal Substructuring to Improve Shock & Vibration Qualification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Modal Analysis & Testing, Volume 9

Abstract

Qualification of complex systems often involves shock and vibration testing at the component level to ensure each component is robust enough to survive the specified environments. In order for the component testing to adequately satisfy the system requirements, the component must exhibit a similar dynamic response between the laboratory component test and system test. There are several aspects of conventional testing techniques that may impair this objective. Modal substructuring provides a framework to accurately assess the level of impairment introduced in the laboratory setup. If the component response is described in terms of fixed-base modes in both the laboratory and system configurations, we can gain insight into whether the laboratory test is exercising the appropriate damage potential. Further, the fixed-base component response in the system can be used to determine the correct rigid body laboratory fixture input to overcome the errors seen in the standard component test. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of reproducing a system shock environment on a simple beam model with an essentially rigid fixture.

Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Welch, J.W.: Flight Unit Qualification Guidelines, Aerospace Report No. TOR02010(8591)-20 (2010). http://aerospace.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/TOR-20108591-20-Flight-Unit-Qualification-Guidelines.pdf

  2. Air Force Space Command.: Test Requirements for Launch, Upper-Stage and Space Vehicles. Space and Missile Systems Center Standard. SMC-S-016 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Department of Defense.: Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests. Test Method Standard, MIL-STD-810G (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jepsen, R., Romero, E., VanGoethem, D: Flight and re-entry test simulation in combined acceleration and vibration environments: part I. In: Proc. of the 78th Shock and Vibration Symp., Philadelphia, PA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jepsen, R., Romero, E.: Flight and re-entry test simulation in combined acceleration, vibration, and spin environments: part II. In: Proc. of the 79th Shock and Vibration Symp., Orlando, FL (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mayes, R.L., Rohe, D.P.: Physical vibration simulation of an acoustic environment with six shakers on an industrial structure. In: Proc. of the 34th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Schultz, R., Walsh, T.: Evaluation of microphone density for finite element source inversion simulation of a laboratory acoustic test. In: Proc. of the 34th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gregory, D.L., Bitsie, F., Smallwood, D.O.: Comparison of the response of a simple structure to single axis and multiple axis random vibration inputs. In: Proc. of the 80th Shock and Vibration Symp., San Diego, CA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smallwood, D.O., Gregory, D.L.: Evaluation of a 6-DOF electrodynamic shaker system. In: Proc. of the 79th Shock and Vibration Symp., Orlando, FL (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Owens, B.C., Tipton, D.G., McDowell, M.: 6 Degree of freedom shock and vibration: testing and analysis. In: Proc. of the 86th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Orlando, FL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scharton, T.D.: Impedance simulation vibration test fixtures for spacecraft tests. Shock Vib. Bull. 40(3), 230–256 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scharton, T.D.: Force limited vibration testing monograph. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sweitzer, K.A.: A mechanical impedance correction technique for vibration tests. Sound Vib. Mag. 30–34 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daborn, P.M.: Smarter dynamic testing of critical structures. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soine, D.E., Jones, R.J., Harvie, J.M., Skousen, T.J., Schoenherr, T.F.: Designing hardware for the boundary condition round robin challenge problem. In Proc. 36th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harvie, J.: Quantification of dynamic differences between boundary condition environment specification improvement. In: Proc. of the 34th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Klerk, D., Rixen, D.J., Voormeeren, S.N.: General framework for dynamic substructuring: history, review, and classification of techniques. AIAA J. 46(5), 1169 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reyes, J.M.: A study on the dynamic interaction of shock response fixtures and test payload. In: Proc. 34th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayes, R.L.: A modal Craig-Bampton substructure for experiments, analysis, control and specifications. In: Proc. of the 33rd International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Allen, M.S., Kammer, D.C., Mayes, R.L.: Experimental based substructuring using a Craig-Bampton transmission simulator model. In: Proc. of the 32nd International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen, M.S., Gindlin, H.M., Mayes, R.L.: Experimental modal substructuring to estimate fixed-base modes from tests on a flexible fixture. J. Sound Vib. 330(18–19), 4413–4428 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen, M.S., Mayes, R.L., Bergman, E.J.: Experimental modal substructuring to couple and uncouple substructures with flexible fixtures and multi-point connections. J. Sound Vib. 329(23), 4891–4906 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smallwood, D.O., Nord, A.R.: Matching shock spectra with sums of decaying sinusoids compensated for shaker velocity and displacement limitations. Shock Vib Bull. 44(Part 3), 43–56 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie M. Harvie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Harvie, J.M. (2019). Using Modal Substructuring to Improve Shock & Vibration Qualification. In: Mains, M., Dilworth, B. (eds) Topics in Modal Analysis & Testing, Volume 9. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74700-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74700-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74699-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74700-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics