Rubbing Along: Proximity and Understandings of Difference

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
  • Gary Armstrong
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology book series (PSUA)

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine how LG residents approached the issue of human variation. More specifically, we explore their attitudes to migration and ethnicity, along with the notions of difference invoked when explaining the behaviours of neighbours and fellow residents. In doing so, we draw on studies of superdiversity, particularly Susanne Wessendorf’s (2013, Commonplace Diversity: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context; Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 392–405, 2014) research on levels and types of cross-class and -ethnic engagement in east London, as well as David Goodhart’s (The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics, 2017) recent work on identity and the rise of populism in the guise of ‘Brexit’ and the election of Donald Trump in the United States. Although lots of engagement across ethnic and class lines occurred in and around the estate, for some residents a set of perceived differences rooted in class and ethnicity remained the cause of tension. Furthermore, any private gatherings tended to be characterised by shared class status. Indeed, in some instances the cross-class and -ethnic engagement that did occur within private space pointed up differences which undercut the sense of commonality that occasioned the engagement in the first place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Alexander, C. (2016, April 7). Researching Race In and Out of the Academy. Address to the Annual Conference of the British Sociological Association (BSA), Aston University, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1958). The Nature of Prejudice. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  3. Back, L. (2015, May 5). Losing Culture or Finding Superdiversity? Discover Society, 20.Google Scholar
  4. Biehl, K. S. (2015). Spatializing Diversities, Diversifying Spaces: Housing Experiences and Home-Space Perceptions in a Migrant Hub of Instanbul. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(4), 596–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, T., & Robson, G. (2003). London Calling: The Middle Classes and the Remaking of Inner London. London: Berg.Google Scholar
  6. Freedland, J. (2017, March 22). The Road to Somewhere by David Goodhart—A Liberal’s Rightwing Turn on Immigration. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  7. Gilroy, P. (2004). After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Goodhart, D. (2017). The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. London: C Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
  9. Hamnett, C. (2003). Unequal City: London in the Global Arena. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Knowles, C. (2012). Nigerian London: Re-mapping Space and Ethnicity in Superdiverse Cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(4), 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krase, J. (2009). A Visual Approach to Multiculturalism. In G. B. Prato (Ed.), Beyond Multiculturalism: Views from Anthropology (pp. 21–38). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Lieven, A. (2011). Pakistan: A Hard Country. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. May, J. (1996). Globalization and the Politics of Place: Place and Identity in an Inner London Neighbourhood. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 21, 194–215.Google Scholar
  14. Puwar, N. (2004). Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson, D. (2010). The Neighbourhood Effects of New Immigration. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2451–2466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosbrook-Thompson, J. (2016). Understanding Difference Amid Superdiversity: Space, ‘Race’ and Granular Essentialisms at an Inner-City Football Club. Sociology, Online first.Google Scholar
  17. Sennett, R. (2003). Respect: The Formation of Character in an Age of Inequality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Sprigings, N. (2017). Housing and Housing Management: Balancing the Two Key Contracts. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tyler, K. (2005). The Genealogical Imagination: The Inheritance of Interracial Identities. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 476–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Watt, P. (2005). Housing Histories and Fragmented Middle-Class Careers: The Case of Marginal Professionals in London Council Housing. Housing Studies, 20(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wessendorf, S. (2013). Commonplace Diversity: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Wessendorf, S. (2014). Being Open, But Sometimes Closed. Conviviality in a Super-Diverse London Neighbourhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
    • 1
  • Gary Armstrong
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK
  2. 2.College of Business, Arts and Social SciencesBrunel University LondonUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations