Advertisement

Setting the Scene

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
  • Gary Armstrong
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology book series (PSUA)

Abstract

In this chapter, we explain how LG came to have the social mix that it does. This requires that we document a number of policies, processes and trends. In doing so, we first provide a potted history of social housing in London, detailing where in the city it is concentrated, when it was built and by whom. Second, we describe the kind of sociopolitical context in which estates like LG were constructed. We then discuss the vexed issue of Right to Buy along with more recent market-led legislation on social housing, before taking stock of the cumulative effects of these policies for LG and other inner-city estates. Finally, in teasing out the characteristics of LG, we develop the notion of ‘select centro-margins’ (SCMs). This notion is important in later chapters when it comes to analysing the realities of ‘social mix’ on LG in relation to themes such as interclass and interethnic engagement, gentrification and (dis)order (among others).

References

  1. Benson, M., & Jackson, E. (2017). Making the Middle Classes on Shifting Ground? Residential Status, Performativity and Middle-Class Subjectivities in Contemporary London. British Journal of Sociology, Online First.Google Scholar
  2. Blandy, S., & Hunter, C. (2013). The Right to Buy: Examination of an Exercise in Allocating, Shifting and Re-branding Risks. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, D. E., & King, A. (1965). The British General Election of 1964. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, T., & Robson, G. (2003). London Calling: The Middle Classes and the Remaking of Inner London. London: Berg.Google Scholar
  5. Caldeira, T. P. R. (1996). Fortified Enclaves: The New Urban Segregation. Public Culture, 8, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, T. (2015 [1965]). The Railway Navvies: A History of the Men Who Made the Railways. London: Head of Zeus.Google Scholar
  7. Collinson, P. (2015, April 18). Why the Right to Buy Council Homes Is All Wrong. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  8. Cooney, E. W. (1974). High Flats in Local Authority Housing in England and Wales Since 1945. In A. Sutcliffe (Ed.), Multi-Storey Living -the British Working Class Experience. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  9. Crook, T. (1986). Privatisation of Housing and the Impact of the Conservative Government’s Initiatives on Low-Cost Homeownership and Private Renting Between 1979 and 1984 in England and Wales: 1. The Privatisation Policies. Environment and Planning A, 18, 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dennis, R. (1989). The Geography of Victorian Values: Philanthropic Housing in London, 1840–1900. Journal of Historical Geography, 15(1), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flynn, R. (1988). Political Acquiescence, Privatisation and Residualisation in British Housing Policy. Journal of Social Policy, 17(3), 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, D. (2015, December 7). Right to Buy: A History of Margaret Thatcher’s Controversial Policy. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  13. Garside, P. (1983). Intergovernmental Relations and Housing Policy in London 1919–1970 with Special Reference to the Density and Location of Council Housing. The London Journal, 9(1), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilroy, P. (2012). ‘My Britain Is Fuck All’ Zombie Multiculturalism and the Race Politics of Citizenship. Identities, 9(4), 380–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gimson, A. (2014, March 21). How Thatcher Sold Council Houses—and Created a New Generation of Property Owners. www.conservativehome.com.
  16. Ginsburg, N. (2005). The Privatization of Council Housing. Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guardian, The. (2015, September 17). 113,000 Council Homes to Be Sold to Pay for Right to Buy—Shelter.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, P. (2002). Cities of Tomorrow. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Hamnett, C. (2003). Unequal City: London in the Global Arena. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hanley, L. (2007). Estates: An Intimate History. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  21. Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hodkinson, S., & Robbins, G. (2013). The Return of Class War Conservatism? Housing Policy Under the UK Coalition Government. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodkinson, S., Watt, P., & Mooney, G. (2013). Introduction: Neoliberal Housing Policy—Time for a Critical Reappraisal. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollander, G. (2012, March 13). Warning Over Right to Buy Risk. Inside Housing.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, C., & Murie, A. (2006). The Right to Buy: Analysis and Evaluation of a Housing Policy. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuper, S. (2013, June 14). Priced Out of Paris. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  27. London School of Economics (LSE). (2010, February 19). Social Housing in London: Background Paper for Seminar on the Future of Social Housing in London. London: LSE.Google Scholar
  28. Manning, A. (2014). Immigrants’ Access to Social Housing: Perception and Reality. CentrePiece (Spring), 11–13.Google Scholar
  29. McDermot, M. (2010). Governing Independence and Expertise: The Business of Housing Associations. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. McGuigan, J. (2014). Neoliberal Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Merrett, S. (1988). Self-Build Housing and the Exploitation of Labour. Housing Studies, 3(4), 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murphy, J. (2016, March 10). London Boroughs ‘Forced to Sell Off Council Housing’. Evening Standard.Google Scholar
  33. Penketh, A. (2014, December 31). France Forced to Drop 75% Supertax After Meagre Returns. The Guardian. Google Scholar
  34. Rex, J. (1988). The Ghetto and the Underclass: Essays on Race and Social Policy. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  35. Scanlon, K., & Whitehead, C. M. E. (2005). The Profile and Intentions of Buy-to-Let Investors. London: Council of Mortgage Lenders.Google Scholar
  36. Sennett, R. (2003). Respect: The Formation of Character in an Age of Inequality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Shrubsole, D. (2014, January 10). Housing Benefit Cuts for Under-25s: Young People Again Feel the Worst of It. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Social Mobility Commission. (2017). Time for Change: An Assessment of Government Policies on Social Mobility 1997–2017. London: SMC.Google Scholar
  40. Tarn, J. N. (1973). Five Per Cent Philanthropy: An Account of Housing in Urban Areas Between 1840 and 1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Watt, P. (2005). Housing Histories and Fragmented Middle-Class Careers: The Case of Marginal Professionals in London Council Housing. Housing Studies, 20(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watt, P. (2017). ‘This Place Is Post-something’—London’s Housing in the Wake of the Grenfell Tower fire. City Analysis.Google Scholar
  43. Webber, R., & Burrows, R. (2016). Life in an Alpha Territory: Discontinuity and Conflict in an Elite London ‘Village’. Urban Studies, 53(15), 3139–3154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, P. (1978). Building Societies and the Inner City. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 3(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
    • 1
  • Gary Armstrong
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK
  2. 2.College of Business, Arts and Social SciencesBrunel University LondonUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations