Abstract
The process of campaigning lasted several years, although the intensity increased as the parliamentary votes drew near. Here we identify a set of campaign strategies and central issues undergoing contestation, specifically the development of an interpretative package used to render the techniques knowable in particular forms through particular terminologies. We also consider the compelling and emotive nature of patient-family experiences. While those in the for-cluster harnessed the political capital of patient narratives for maintaining media, policy, and parliamentarians’ attention, they also experienced a burden of risk under the media glare, and the associated emotional and institutional labour of offering protection. We also discuss how against-cluster campaigners responded to face-to-face encounters with patient-families. Finally, we focus on the promissory, ethical and bureaucratic labour of last minute campaigning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, V. (2015, February 2). Why I want a 3-parent baby, by mother of girl with rare deadly disease: Woman calls on MPs to allow technique ‘that could help so many others’. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2935670/Why-want-3-parent-baby-mother-girl-rare-deadly-disease-Woman-calls-MPs-allow-technique-help-others.html#ixzz4tnaVW7UX [accessed 20 Oct 2017].
BMA. (2015, February 2). For and against mitochondrial donation. The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/for-and-against-mitochondrial-donation-8vjnc7bs2kw [accessed 31 Oct 2017].
Center for Genetics and Society. (2015, January 29). An open letter to UK members of parliament as vote on “mitochondrial donation” approaches. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/press-statement/open-letter-uk-members-parliament-vote-mitochondrial-donation-approaches?id=8338 [accessed 20 Oct 2017].
Department of Health (DoH). (2014). Mitochondrial donation: Government response to the consultation on draft regulations to permit the use of new treatment techniques to prevent the transmission of a serious mitochondrial disease from mother to child. Department of Health. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332881/Consultation_response.pdf.
Dimond, R., & Stephens, N. (2017). Three persons, three genetic contributors, three parents: Mitochondrial donation, genetic parenting and the immutable grammar of the ‘three x x’. Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459316689380.
Driscoll, M. (2015, February 1). Why we want the first three-parent baby. The Sunday Times. http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/focus/article1514067.ece [accessed 27 May 2016].
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
Haran, J., Kitzinger, J., McNeil, M., & O’Riordan, K. (2008). Human cloning in the media: From science fiction to science practice. London: Routledge.
Herbrand, C., & Dimond, R. (2017). Mitochondrial donation, patient engagement and narratives of hope. Sociology of Health and Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12631.
Highfield, R. (2005, September 9). Designer babies to wipe out diseases approved. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1497972/Designer-babies-to-wipe-out-diseases-approved.html [accessed 4 Mar 2018].
Knapton, S. (2015, February 1). Three-parent baby technique no more sinister than blood transfusion, says Robert Winston. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11383004/Three-parent-baby-technique-no-more-sinister-than-blood-transfusion-says-Robert-Winston.html [accessed 30 Oct 2017].
Langstrup, H. (2011). Interpellating patients as users. Patient associations and the project-ness of stem cell research. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(4), 573–594.
McVeigh, K., & Sample, I. (2014, October 22). Parents of disabled child appeal to MPs to allow ‘three-person embryos’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/22/parents-three-person-embryos-mitochondrial-disease [accessed 20 Oct 2017].
Mikolášik, M., Schaffhauser, J. L., Stier, D., Morgano, L., et al. (2015). Open letter on mitochondrial donation regulations. http://www.edwardleigh.org.uk/2015/meps-letter/ [accessed 29 Nov 2017].
Novas, C. (2006). The political economy of hope: Patients’ organizations, science and biovalue. BioSocieties, 1, 289–305.
Sulston, J., Deech, B., Warnock, B., & Savill, J. (2015, January 28). Three person IVF. Letter to The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/three-person-ivf-73wgwt096z2 [accessed 20 Oct 2017].
Sunderland Echo. (2010, April 15). DNA research gives mums hope. http://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/dna-research-gives-mums-hope-1-1109636 [accessed 4 Nov 2017].
Turkmendag, I. (2018). It is just a “battery”: “Right” to know in mitochondrial replacement. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(1), 56–85.
von Radowitz, J. (2010, April 14). DNA breakthrough may prevent inherited diseases. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/dna-breakthrough-may-prevent-inherited-diseases-1944926.html [accessed 21 Nov 2017].
Watts, H. (2015, January 31). Three person IVF. The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/three-person-ivf-rxxst78b6r6 [accessed 30 Oct 2017].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dimond, R., Stephens, N. (2018). Campaigning: Contested Meanings, Patient-Families, and Last Minute Labours. In: Legalising Mitochondrial Donation. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74645-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74645-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74644-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74645-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)