Advertisement

Multi-Tonal Based Impedance Measurements for Microsecond State Detection

  • Ryan A. KettleEmail author
  • Steven R. Anton
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

This paper concerns the development of a system capable of microsecond state detection via the electromechanical impedance (EMI) method utilizing a novel multi-tonal excitation approach. Structures that operate in highly dynamic environments, such as aircraft and drilling equipment, can benefit from a system capable of quickly detecting changes in the structure’s dynamic state. These changes of state can occur due to phenomenon, such as high velocity impacts, and necessitate a measurement system capable of working at millisecond to microsecond timescales. Traditionally, the electrical impedance of the PZT utilized in the EMI method is measured across a broad range of frequencies using an impedance analyzer, such as an HP 4194A; however, they are heavy, slow, and limited to a small amount of data points for each measurement. These disadvantages are overcome by using an alternative measurement system using data acquisition hardware, an auxiliary measurement circuit, and a custom coded analysis system. A key part of this measurement system is the use of a customizable excitation signal to drive the PZT. Due to the small amount of time in which a microsecond state detection system has to collect and analyze data, the excitation signal should be carefully designed to minimize measurement time while retaining accuracy. The use of conventional broadband frequency sweep excitations in a short amount of time presents challenges due to the fact that the total energy available to excite the structure becomes limited. This work investigates a novel multi-tonal excitation approach where only targeted frequency bands containing relevant structural information are excited in order to reduce the excitation time. The timing advantage of the multi-tonal signal is shown by matching the frequency dependent voltage of targeted frequency bands to that of a wideband chirp signal, which results in a 36% reduction in excitation time. The accuracy of the multi-tonal signal is also demonstrated; the impedance spectrum shows good agreement with both the wideband chirp signal and the HP 4194A. Damage detection of a structure is also presented using the multi-tonal excitation signals.

Keywords

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Electromechanical Impedance (EMI) Method Piezoelectric materials Microsecond state detection Dynamic systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Worden, K., Farrar, C.R., Manson, G., Park, G.: The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 463(2082), 1639–1664 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balageas, D., Fritzen, C.-P., Güemes, A.: Structural Health Monitoring. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park, G., Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Inman, D.J.: Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward. Shock Vib. Dig. 35(6), 451–463 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhalla, S., Moharana, S.: A refined shear lag model for adhesively bonded piezo-impedance transducers. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 24(1), 33–48 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giurgiutiu, V., Zagrai, A.N.: Characterization of piezoelectric wafer active sensors. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 11(12), 959–976 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peairs, D.M., Park, G., Inman, D.J.: Improving accessibility of the impedance-based structural health monitoring method. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 15(2), 129–139 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, B., Giurgiutiu, V.: A low-cost and field portable electromechanical (E/M) impedance analyzer for active structural health monitoring. Presented at the proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saar, T.: Robust Piezo impedance magnitude measurement method. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika. 113(7), 107–110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, J., Grisso, B.L., Ha, D.S., and Inman, D.J.: A system-on-board approach for impedance-based structural health monitoring. Presented at the 14th international symposium on: Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    David, L.M., Michael, D.T., Gyuhae, P., Charles, R.F.: Development of an impedance-based wireless sensor node for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 16(6), 2137 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park, S., Lee, J.-J., Yun, C.-B., Inman, D.J.: Electro-mechanical impedance-based wireless structural health monitoring using PCA-data compression and k-means clustering algorithms. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 19(4), 509–520 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baptista, F.G.: A new impedance measurement system for PZT-based structural health monitoring. Instrum. Meas. IEEE Trans. 58(10), 3602–3608 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Lewis Jr., G.K., Lewis Sr., G.K., Olbricht, W.: Cost-effective broad-band electrical impedance spectroscopy measurement circuit and signal analysis for piezo-materials and ultrasound transducers. Meas. Sci. Technol. 19(10), 105102 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baptista, F.G., Vieira Filho, J., Inman, D.J.: Real-time multi-sensors measurement system with temperature effects compensation for impedance-based structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 11(2), 173–186 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baptista, F.G., Filho, J.V., Inman, D.J.: Influence of excitation signal on impedance-based structural health monitoring. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 21(14), 1409–1416 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTennessee Technological UniversityCookevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations