Advertisement

A Low-Cost Modular Impact-Based Experimental Setup for Evaluation of EMI Based Structural Health Monitoring at High Rates

  • Ekramul Haque EhiteEmail author
  • Steven R. Anton
Conference paper
  • 517 Downloads
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of the electromechanical impedance (EMI) method for detecting changes in the dynamic state of structures by presenting a low-cost, modular, instrumented, impact-based experimental setup. This experimental setup consists of a pneumatically actuated moving impacting aluminum bar, which will be launched to collide with a static incident bar at various impact velocities. The system allows for the use of different dimensions and materials for both the impacting bar and the incident bar. The boundary conditions of the incident bar can be changed by configuring the non-impacted side of the bar as clamped or free. The velocity of the impacting bar is measured using an array of two photoelectric sensors. A piezoelectric transducer attached to the incident bar is utilized for detecting the changes in dynamic state at the interface between the two bars by utilizing the EMI method. The impedance data is acquired and processed using a custom made measurement and analysis suite at very high-rate. Preliminary measurement results are presented to demonstrate the capability of the developed system to achieve repeatable and customizable impact events and also monitor the impedance response of the piezoelectric sensor. The long-term goal of this research is the use of this impact-based experimental setup for damage detection in structures operating in highly dynamic environments. This will be done by coupling the setup with a measurement system capable of microsecond data acquisition and processing.

Keywords

Structural health monitoring (SHM) Electromechanical impedance (EMI) method State detection Dynamic systems Piezoelectric materials (PZTs) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under award number FA9550-16-1-0440 entitled “(YIP) Continuous Real-Time State Monitoring in Highly Dynamic Environments” monitored by Dr. J. Tiley.

References

  1. 1.
    Farrar, C., Worden, K.: Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Approach. Wiley, Chichester (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giurgiutiu, V.: Embedded NDT with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. In: Nondestructive Testing of Materials and Structures, pp. 987–992. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Na, W.S., Park, K.-T.: A cost-effective impedance-based structural health monitoring technique for steel structures by monitoring multiple areas. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 28(2), 154–162 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meitzler, A., Tiersten, H., Warner, A., Berlincourt, D., Couqin, G., Welsh III, F.: IEEE standard on piezoelectricity. ANSI/IEEE (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park, G., et al.: Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward. Shock Vib. Dig. 35(6), 451–463 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giurgiutiu, V., Zagrai, A.N.: Characterization of piezoelectric wafer active sensors. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 11(12), 959–976 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liang, C., Sun, F., Rogers, C.: Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems-determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 8(4), 335–343 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giurgiutiu, V., Rogers, C.: Electro-mechanical (E/M) impedance method for structural health monitoring and nondestructive evaluation. Structural Health Monitoring—Current Status and Perspective. 18–20 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park, G., Inman, D.J.: Impedance-based structural health monitoring. Damage prognosis for aerospace, civil and mechanical systems. 275–292 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peairs, D.M., Park, G., Inman, D.J.: Improving accessibility of the impedance-based structural health monitoring method. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 15(2), 129–139 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, J.: et al. A system-on-board approach for impedance-based structural health monitoring. In: The 14th International Symposium on: Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring. 2007. International Society for Optics and PhotonicsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis Jr., G.K., Lewis Sr., G.K., Olbricht, W.: Cost-effective broad-band electrical impedance spectroscopy measurement circuit and signal analysis for piezo-materials and ultrasound transducers. Meas. Sci. Technol. 19(10), 105102 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pitropakis, I., Pfeiffer, H., Wevers, M.: Crack detection in aluminium plates for aerospace applications by electromagnetic impedance spectroscopy using flat coil sensors. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 176, 57–63 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    David, L.M., et al.: Development of an impedance-based wireless sensor node for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 16(6), 2137 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park, S., et al.: Electro-mechanical impedance-based wireless structural health monitoring using PCA-data compression and k-means clustering algorithms. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 19(4), 509–520 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wandowski, T., P. Malinowski, W. Ostachowicz.: Calibration Problem of AD5933 Device for Electromechanical Impedance Measurements. in EWSHM-7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu, B., V. Giurgiutiu.: A low-cost and field portable electromechanical (E/M) impedance analyzer for active structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. 2005. Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baptista, F.G.: A new impedance measurement system for PZT-based structural health monitoring. Instrum. Meas., IEEE Trans. 58(10), 3602–3608 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saar, T.: Robust Piezo impedance magnitude measurement method. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika. 113(7), 107–110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baptista, F.G., Vieira Filho, J., Inman, D.J.: Real-time multi-sensors measurement system with temperature effects compensation for impedance-based structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 11(2), 173–186 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baptista, F.G., Filho, J.V., Inman, D.J.: Influence of excitation signal on impedance-based structural health monitoring. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 21(14), 1409–1416 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hopkinson, B.: A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.. A, Cont. Pap. Math. Phys. Char. 213, 437–456 (1914)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kolsky, H.: An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Sect. B. 62(11), 676 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robertson, K.D., Chou, S.-C., Rainey, J.H.: Design and Operating Characteristics of a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Apparatus. Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dynamics and Smart Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tennessee Technological UniversityCookevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations