Abstract
Some elected officials have been both closeted and homophobic, supporting anti-gay policies and laws at every opportunity, even trumpeting their anti-gay voting record to their constituents. While their choice to be closeted may be protected by privacy, an aspect of broader liberty, may they at the same time be outed without violating their right to privacy? Some members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community have chosen to express their autonomy in a different way: by being out, yet being out in a homophobic society with its anti-gay policies and laws has entailed risks that impinge on this autonomy and on the freedom to participate as an equal citizen in a society that was foreclosed as much possible by the closeted homophobic elected public official who helps to maintain a system that accords him money, privilege, and power at a cost he apparently is willing to bear. This is an asymmetrical relationship in which the choice of the gay but homophobic lawmaker to be closeted is protected but incompatible with the autonomy of others, namely, of gay individuals and the LGBT community as a whole who are negatively impacted by the laws and policies the former advocates for. This asymmetry, based on a fraudulent pretense, contributes to the injustice at work and affects the political process for gay- citizen participants that outing rightly seeks to rectify.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Here he is referring to Bowers v. Hardwick (478 U.S. 186, 1986).
- 2.
See the discussion in Samar (1991), pp. 108–111. Note that it is unlikely that any lawmaker’s every vote and stand taken is simply and consistently a reflection of his or her perception of what the voters want, with no exercise of their own judgment.
- 3.
Parent makes these comments in reference to the work of Richard Posner (muddled) and William Prosser (confused).
- 4.
Halley is here quoting George Orwell’s 1984.
- 5.
Gross is here quoting Sedgwick (1990).
- 6.
Beachy is referring to Friedrich Alfred Krupp. Chaplain Georg Friedrich Dasbach, the “sometime leader of the Catholic Center Party,” was also outed and is believed to have committed suicide in 1907 (Ibid., p. 115). The Krupp and Dasbach affairs are also discussed in Gross (1993), pp. 8–10.
References
Beachy R (2015) Gay Berlin: birthplace of a modern identity. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
Blasius M (1994) Gay and lesbian politics: sexuality and the emergence of a new ethic. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Blasius M, Phelan S (eds) (1997) We are everywhere: a historical sourcebook of gay and lesbian politics. Routledge, New York
Bok S (1999) Lying: moral choice in public and private life. Vintage Books, New York
Boling P (1996) Privacy and the politics of intimate life. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Brownworth V (1990) Should gays be forced to come out of the closet? Philly August 25, 1990, online at http://articles.philly.com/1990-08-25/news/25932558_1_gay-conservatives-heterosexual-outing
Crimp D (1993) Right on, girlfriend! In: Warner M (ed) Fear of a queer planet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 300–320
Friedman L (1990) The republic of choice: law, authority, and culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gross L (1993) Contested closets: the politics and ethics of outing. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Halley J (1989) The politics of the closet: towards equal protection of gay, lesbian, and bisexual identity. UCLA Law Rev 36:915–976
Inness J (1992) Privacy, intimacy, and isolation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Johansson W, Percy W (1994) Outing: shattering the conspiracy of silence. Harrington Park Press, New York
McCarthy J (1994) The closet and the ethics of outing. In: Murphy T (ed) Gay ethics. Harrington Park Press, Binghamton, pp 27–45
Mohr R (1992) Gay ideas: outing and other controversies. Beacon Press, Boston
Moran L (1996) The homosexual(ity) of law. Routledge, London
Murphy T (ed) (1994) Gay ethics: controversies in outing, civil rights, and sexual science. Harrington Park Press, Binghamton
O’Brien D (1979) Privacy, law, and public policy. Praeger, New York
Parent W (1983) Recent work on the concept of privacy. Am Philos Q 20(4):341–355
Rosenblatt R (1993) Who killed privacy? http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/31/magazine/who-killed-privacy. Accessed 8 June 2016
Rubenfeld J (1989) The right of privacy. Harv Law Rev 102(4):737–807
Samar V (1991) The right to privacy: gays, lesbians, and the constitution. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Sedgwick E (1990) Epistemology of the closet. University of California Press, Berkeley
Shilts R (1997) Is “outing” gays ethical? In: Blasius M, Phelan S (eds) We are everywhere. Routledge, New York, pp 767–769
Signorile M (1997) Who should open the closet door? In: Blasius M, Phelan S (eds) We are everywhere. Routledge, New York, pp 769–770
Signorile M (2015) It’s not over: getting beyond tolerance, defeating homophobia, and winning true equality. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston
Steinmetz K (2016) Uncle Sam wants to know how many LGBT people there are in America. Time 187(21):21–22
Thomas K (1992) Beyond the privacy principle. Columbia Law Rev 92(6):1431–1516
Vaid U (1995) Virtual equality: the mainstreaming of gay and lesbian liberation. Anchor, New York
Warner M (ed) (1993) Fear of a queer planet: queer politics and social theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Warren SD, Brandeis LD (1890) The right to privacy. Harv Law Rev 4(5):193–220
Young I (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Babst, G.A. (2018). Privacy and Outing. In: Cudd, A., Navin, M. (eds) Core Concepts and Contemporary Issues in Privacy. AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74639-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74639-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74638-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74639-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)