Skip to main content

Wage and Hour Legal Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wage and Hour Law

Abstract

Compliance with wage and hour laws within the USA is an evolving legal landscape and requires familiarity with many different statutes and regulations at both the federal, state, and local level along with court decisions that interpret the laws. The focus of this chapter is those issues that are frequently litigated and can be addressed using systematic methods from industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology or related disciplines. This chapter provides an overview of the FLSA and its associated regulations along with state and local laws that contain additional wage and hour obligations. The legal framework for several specific wage and hour disputes are provided, including FLSA exemptions, independent contractor classification, off the clock work, and meal and rest break compliance. Because many wage and hour lawsuits are brought as class or collective actions, an overview of the class certification process is also provided. The chapter concludes with a description of litigation trends in wage and hour litigation. This chapter provides the legal background of each of the issues discussed in later chapters.

The original version of this chapter was revised. A correction to this chapter can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74612-8_10

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    29 U.S.C. §§ 201–219. The statute can be accessed online at https://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/statutes/FairLaborStandAct.pdf

  2. 2.

    Grossman (n.d.).

  3. 3.

    Pederson (2006).

  4. 4.

    US Department of Labor (2016a).

  5. 5.

    29 C.F.R. §§ 500–899. This section of the Code of Federal Regulations can be accessed online at https://www.dol.gov/dol/cfr/Title_29/Chapter_V.htm

  6. 6.

    See Grossman (n.d.).

  7. 7.

    US Department of Labor (2009).

  8. 8.

    US Department of Labor (2009).

  9. 9.

    29 U.S.C. § 206; US Department of Labor (n.d.a).

  10. 10.

    29 U.S.C. § 207.

  11. 11.

    29 U.S.C. § 212; 29 C.F.R. § 570; US Department of Labor (2013).

  12. 12.

    29 U.S.C. § 211; 29 C.F.R. § 516; US Department of Labor (2008a).

  13. 13.

    29 C.F.R. § 541.

  14. 14.

    29 C.F.R. § 785.

  15. 15.

    29 C.F.R. § 778.

  16. 16.

    29 C.F.R. § 778.

  17. 17.

    For links to specific state laws, see US Department of Labor (n.d.b) available at https://www.dol.gov/whd/state/state.htm

  18. 18.

    29 U.S.C. § 218(a).

  19. 19.

    See, e.g., Department of Industrial Relations (2016).

  20. 20.

    See UC Berkeley Labor Center (2017).

  21. 21.

    National Partnership for Women and Families (2017).

  22. 22.

    National Conference of State Legislatures (2016).

  23. 23.

    City and County of San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement (n.d.).

  24. 24.

    29 C.F.R. § 541; see alsoUS Department of Labor (2008b).

  25. 25.

    29 C.F.R. § 541.400.

  26. 26.

    29 C.F.R. § 541.500.

  27. 27.

    29 C.F.R. § 541.601.

  28. 28.

    Executive Office of the President (2014).

  29. 29.

    US Department of Labor (2016b).

  30. 30.

    Nevada v. US Dep’t of Labor.

  31. 31.

    Nevada v. US Dep’t of Labor; see alsoUS Department of Labor (2017a).

  32. 32.

    US Department of Labor (2017b).

  33. 33.

    US Department of Labor (2014).

  34. 34.

    US Department of Labor (n.d.c).

  35. 35.

    US Department of Labor (n.d.c).

  36. 36.

    US Department of Labor (n.d.c).

  37. 37.

    US Department of Labor (2017c); US Department of Labor (2017d).

  38. 38.

    See, e.g., O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al.

  39. 39.

    29 U.S.C. §§ 206–207 (2012).

  40. 40.

    Alaska Stat. §§ 23.10.050–23.10.150 (2016); Cal. Lab. Code § 510 (2016); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.018 (2016).

  41. 41.

    US Department of Labor (2008c); see also US Department of Labor (2008d).

  42. 42.

    29 C.F.R. § 785.47 (2016); see also Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.

  43. 43.

    Addison v. Huron Stevedoring Corp.

  44. 44.

    US Department of Labor (2008e).

  45. 45.

    Green (2016); Troester v. Starbucks Corp.

  46. 46.

    US Department of Labor (2017e); HR360 (2017).

  47. 47.

    US Department of Labor (2017f).

  48. 48.

    The California Fair Pay Act prohibits California employers from paying their employees less than employees of the opposite sex for “substantially similar” work unless the employer can show that the pay gap is justified by a factor other than sex, such as seniority, merit, a system that measures production, or differences in education, training, or experience (Department of Industrial Relations, 2017). Effective January 1, 2017, the Act was expanded to cover unequal pay as to race and ethnicity. See Wage Equality Act of 2016.

  49. 49.

    See Cal. Lab. Code, available at http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=LAB&tocTitle=+Labor+Code+-+LAB

  50. 50.

    See Cal. Code Regs., available at https://www.dir.ca.gov/IWC/WageOrderIndustries.htm

  51. 51.

    Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (2017).

  52. 52.

    The opinion letters are available online at https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/OpinionLetters-bySubject.htm

  53. 53.

    Saltsman (2017).

  54. 54.

    I.W.C. Wage Order 7-2001 § 14.

  55. 55.

    See, e.g., Lee (2017).

  56. 56.

    29 U.S.C. § 216(b).

  57. 57.

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, available at https://www.federalrulesofcivilprocedure.org/frcp/title-iv-parties/rule-23-class-actions/

  58. 58.

    29 U.S.C. § 216(b).

  59. 59.

    See, e.g., Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Sperling (vesting district courts with the authority and discretion “to implement 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) . . . by facilitating notice to potential plaintiffs”).

  60. 60.

    See, e.g., Cal. Code of Civ. Pro. § 382.

  61. 61.

    Vasquez v. Superior Court.

  62. 62.

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a).

  63. 63.

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3).

  64. 64.

    Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes (quoting Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon).

  65. 65.

    Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes.

  66. 66.

    DePillis (2015).

  67. 67.

    Teachout (2017).

  68. 68.

    Ramirez (2017).

  69. 69.

    See DePillis (2015).

  70. 70.

    See Ramirez (2017).

References

Statutes and Regulations

Court Cases

  • Addison v. Huron Stevedoring Corp., 204 F. 2d 88, 95 (2d Cir. 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147, 157 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Sperling, 493 U.S. 165, 169 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevada v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 227 F. Supp. 3d 696 (E.D. Tex. 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., C13-3826 EMC (N.D. Cal.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Troester v. Starbucks Corp., No. S234969 (Cal.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 3d 800, 821 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Theodore E. Alexander, a student at the George Washington University Law School, for his contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chester Hanvey .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hanvey, C., White, J. (2018). Wage and Hour Legal Context. In: Wage and Hour Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74612-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics