Overseeing Institutions

  • Joseph Berechman


Transportation agencies can be viewed as specialized institutions whose mission is to supply transportation facilities and services within defined geographic regions. How well do they accomplish their mission, especially with respect to the choice of worthy transportation projects?


  1. Acemoglu, D., and S. Johnson. 2005. Unbundling Institutions. Journal of Political Economy 113 (5): 949–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. Robinson. 2004. Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 10481. Washington, DC: NBER.Google Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., and G. Tabellini. 2004. Bureaucrats or Politicians? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 10241, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  4. Altshuler, A., and D. Luberoff. 2003. Megaprojects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  5. Appelbaum, E., and J. Berechman. 1991. Demand Conditions, Regulation, and the Measurement of Productivity. Journal of Econometrics 47: 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berechman, J. 2009. The Evaluation of Transportation Investment Projects. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Berechman, J., and L. Chen. 2011. Incorporating Risk of Cost Overruns into Transportation Capital Projects Decision-Making. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 45 (1): 83–104.Google Scholar
  8. Berechman, J., and R. Paaswell. 2005. Evaluation, Prioritization and Selection of Transportation Investment Projects in New York City. Transportation 32: 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertrand, M., and A. Schoar. 2003. Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1169–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Besley, T., and S. Coate. 2003. Centralized Versus Decentralized Provision of Local Public Goods: A Political Economy Approach. Journal of Public Economics 87: 2611–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, D., G. Hoover, A. Howaston, and J. Schulman. 2005. Canada’s Transportation Infrastructure Challenge: Strengthening the Foundations. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada.
  12. Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coate, S., and B. Knight. 2009. Government Form and Public Spending: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Municipalities. NBER Working Paper No. 14857, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  14. Coelli, T. 2003. A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cres, H., I. Gilboa, and N. Vieille. 2012. Bureaucracy in Quest for Feasibility. A Seminar Paper.
  16. De Borger, B., F. Dunkerley, and S. Proost. 2007. Strategic Investment and Pricing Decisions in a Congested Transport Corridor. Journal of Urban Economics 62 (2): 294–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Borger, B., and S. Proost. 2012. Transport Policy Competition Between Governments: A Selective Survey of the Literature. Economics of Transportation 1: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Borger, B., S. Proost, and K. Van Dender. 2005. Congestion and Tax Competition on in a Parallel Network. European Economic Review 49: 2013–2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Palma, A., and R. Lindsey. 2000. Private Toll Roads: A Dynamic Equilibrium Analysis. Annals of Regional Science 34 (1): 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Derrick, P., R. Paaswell, and D. Petretta. 2012. Transportation Policy and Politics in New York State. In The Oxford Handbook of New York State Government and Politics. New York and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Doig, J. 2001. Empire on the Hudson: Entrepreneurial Vision and Political Power at the Port of New York. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Doig, W. 2012. Should It Take Decades to Build a Subway? Salon, February 4, 2012.
  23. Durkheim, E. 1949 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Evergreen Line. 2013. Decisions on Scope of Evergreen Line Not Fully Informed – Auditor General. (Kelly Sinoski, Vancouver Sun 03.28.2013), The Vancouver Sun, Vancouver, Canada.
  25. Flyvbjerg, B. 2005. Measuring Inaccuracy in Travel Demand Forecasting: Methodological Considerations Regarding Ramp Up and Sampling. Transportation Research A 39 (6): 522–530.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2006. Design by Deception: The Politics of Megaproject Approval. In Urban Planning Today, ed. William S. Saunders, 131–148. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Flyvbjerg, B., M.K. Holm, and S.L. Buhl. 2004. What Causes Cost Overruns in Transport Infrastructure Projects. Transport Reviews 24 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fu, H., and L. Nie. 2011. Economy and Efficiency Oriented Passenger Flow Organization: Train Stop Scheduling for High-Speed Railways. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology 20: 79–83.Google Scholar
  29. Greif, A. 2008. The Impact of Administrative Power on Political and Economic Developments. In Institutions and Economic Performance, ed. E. Helpman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hatch, M., and A. Cunliffe. 2006. Organization Theory. 2nd ed. New York and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, B., and B. Olken. 2005. Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth Since World War II. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3): 835–864.Google Scholar
  32. Kluger, B. 2012. Improving the Management of Crews in the MTA Long Island Rail Road’s Structural Maintenance Division.
  33. Knight, B. 2004. Parochial Interests and the Centralized Provision of Local Public Goods: Evidence from Congressional Voting on Transportation Projects. Journal of Public Economics 88: 845–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levinson, D. 2001. Why States Toll – An Empirical Model of Finance Choice. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35 (2): 223–238.Google Scholar
  35. Lim, C. 2013. TransLink Governance Review, A Report. Acuere Consulting Inc.
  36. March, J., and H. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  37. Moss, M., and H. O’Neill. 2014. A Port Authority That Works. New York: Rudin Center for Transportation, The Wagner School, New York University.Google Scholar
  38. Niskanen, W. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  39. Paaswell, R., and J. Berechman. 2006. Models and Realities: Choosing Transit Projects for New York City (Chap. 5). In Policy Analysis of Transportation Networks, ed. Marina van Geenhuizen, Aura Reggiani, and Piet Rietveld. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  40. Plotch, P. 2015. Politics Across the Hudson: The Tappan Zee Megaproject. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Proost, S., F. Dunkerley, S. Van der Loo, N. Adler, J. Brocker, and A. Korzhenevyc. 2010. Do the Selected Trans European Transport Investments Pass the Cost Benefit Test?” Center for Economic Studies (CES), Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, Discussion Paper 10.02.Google Scholar
  42. Rork, J. 2009. Yardstick Competition in Toll Revenues: Evidence from US States. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 43 (1): 123–139.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, A. 1957 [1776]. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, S. 2012. New York’s MTA Doesn’t Need Any More Money. Bloomberg, October 10, 2012.
  45. Taylor, F. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  46. Vancouver Sun. 2013. Metro Mayors Want the Keys to TransLink. March 22.
  47. Williamson, O. 1995. Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. New York and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Yandle, B. 1983. Bootleggers and Baptists: The Education of a Regulatory Economist. Regulation 7 (3): 12–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Berechman
    • 1
  1. 1.City College of New YorkUniversity of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations