Advertisement

Lifescapes in Recovery

  • Lucy EasthopeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This is a chapter about the meaning of place after the disaster and the way that residents and responders mutually constructed a collective sense of place in the village of Toll Bar in 2007. It is a discussion of the heterogeneous network of physical structures and human actors that entwined in the village in the years following the floods. It is about the role that places and spaces play in recovering but also how vulnerable they can be.

References

  1. Academy for Community Leadership (ACL). (2008). Toll Bar on Sea. Published by Toll Bar Forum in Association with Pontefract Press [A collection of the testimonies of Toll Bar residents collected in 2007 immediately after the floods].Google Scholar
  2. Audit Commission. (2008). Neighbourhood Management: Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council. August.Google Scholar
  3. BBC. (2007, September 10). Flood Victims’ Caravan Park Opens. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/6986624.stm as at December 1, 2009.
  4. Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, B., Morbey, H., Baolgh, R., & Araoz, G. (2009). Flooded Homes, Broken Bonds, The Meaning of Home, Psychological Processes and Their Impact on Psychological Health in a Disaster. Health and Place, 15, 540–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coates, T. (2010). How Can Local Communities Cope with Flooding? Understanding Local Social Structures and How These Shape Collective Flood Response. In Health Protection Agency, Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report (October, Issue 18). Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards.Google Scholar
  7. Conradson, D. (2005). Freedom, Space and Perspective: Moving Encounters with Other Ecologies. In J. Davidson, L. Bondi, & M. Smith (Eds.), Emotional Geographies. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Convery, I., Mort, M., Baxter, J., & Bailey, C. (2008). Animal Disease and Human Trauma. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, I. (1978). Shelter After Disaster. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic Press. Google Scholar
  10. Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (DMBC). (2008). Neighbourhood Management Team Data—Notes (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  11. Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (DMBC). (2012). Greater Bentley Ward Area. http://www.doncaster.gov.uk/Community_and_Living/Neighbourhoods/Communities/Greater_Bentley/Greater_Bentley.asp as at June 1, 2012.
  12. Enarson, E. (2000). We Will Make Meaning Out of This: Women’s Cultural Responses to the Red River Valley Flood. International Journal of Emergency Management, 18(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
  13. Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in Its Path. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Eyre, A. (2007, December 14). Family First. Police Review, pp. 28–31.Google Scholar
  15. Fordham, M. (1998). Making Women Visible in Disasters: Problematising the Private Domain. Disasters, 22(2), 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Phillips, M. (2008, June 25). The Tide has Turned. The Sun Newspaper, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
  18. Sims, R., Medd, W., Mort, M., & Twigger- Ross, C. (2009). When a ‘Home’ Becomes a ‘House’ Care and Caring in the Flood Recovery Process. Space and Culture, 12, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Szerszynski, B., Wallace, H., & Waterton, C. (Eds.). (2003). Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Recovery adviser and researcherDoncasterUK

Personalised recommendations