Value, Waste and the ‘Furniture of Self’

  • Lucy EasthopeEmail author


This is a chapter about the meaning of things after disaster and specifically the meaning of things to the people recovering from disaster. In Chapter  3, I examined the way in which official narratives of what is important after one disaster influence the construction of technologies that will support those in future disasters. In this chapter, I explore a specific set of assumptions by official narratives, articulated through the National Recovery Guidance, differ from what is happening in the lived realities of residents in Toll Bar. This is not a benign difference; I will show that when a dominant official narrative and official understanding, in this case that the belongings of residents are now waste, is prioritised, then the consequences on the situated realities are far reaching and devastating.


  1. Academy for Community Leadership (ACL). (2008). Toll Bar on Sea. Published by Toll Bar Forum in Association with Pontefract Press [A collection of the testimonies of Toll Bar residents collected in 2007 immediately after the floods].Google Scholar
  2. Cabinet Office. (2011a). National Recovery Guidance: Recovery Guidance- Environmental Issues. Available at as at February 1, 2011.
  3. Cabinet Office. (2011b). Case Study: Indian Ocean Tsunami. as at February 1, 2011.
  4. Cabinet Office. (2011c). Case Study: Carlisle Floods—Dealing with Insurance Issues. as at February 1, 2011.
  5. Cabinet Office. (2011d). Case Study: Buncefield Explosion—Displaced Communities. as at February 1, 2011.
  6. Cabinet Office. (2011e). National Recovery Guidance—Infrastructure Issues - Dealing with Insurance Issues. as at February 1, 2011.
  7. Convery, I., Mort, M., Baxter, J., & Bailey, C. (2008). Animal Disease and Human Trauma. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Disaster Action. (2008). When Disaster Strikes—The Return of Personal Property. Available at and on the July 7th Assistance Website as at February 1, 2011.
  9. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easthope, L. (2008, November). Returning Property After Death and Disaster. In An Anthology: Making Sense of Death and Dying (pp. 180–182). Milton Keynes: Open University Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in Its Path. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Harada, T. (2000). Space, Materials, and the ‘Social’ in the Aftermath of a Disaster. Environment and Planning D Society and Space, 18, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Law, J. (1994). Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Payne, L., & Eyre, A. (2005, March). Personal Effect: The Role of the Police in Returning Property. Police Review.Google Scholar
  15. Payne, L., & Eyre, A. (2006, May). Returning Personal Possessions After Disasters. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 35–39. Available at as at February 1, 2011, pp. 28–31.
  16. Sims, R. et al. (2008). The Ongoing Experience of Recovery for Households in Hull-Response to the Pitt Review Interim Report [This material was later quoted in Pitt’s final Review].Google Scholar
  17. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  18. Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and Place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Recovery adviser and researcherDoncasterUK

Personalised recommendations