Advertisement

Flood Tales and Fantasy Documents

  • Lucy EasthopeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This is a chapter about conflict, context, closeness and difference told through the descriptions of three events: A ‘lessons learned’ conference, a public meeting at a primary school and a village carnival.

References

  1. Academy for Community Leadership (ACL). (2008). Toll Bar on Sea. Published by Toll Bar Forum in association with Pontefract Press [A collection of the testimonies of Toll Bar residents collected in 2007 immediately after the floods].Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, C., Covery, I., Mort, M., & Baxter, J. (2006). Different Public Health Geographies of the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Epidemic: ‘Citizen’ Versus ‘Professional Epidemiology’. Health and Place, 12, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birkland, T. (2009). Disasters, Lessons Learned, and Fantasy Documents. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(3), 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, L. (1999). Mission Improbable. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coles, E., & Easthope, L. (2009). Back to School Qualifications, Competences and Cultural Change. Presentation to the FEMA HE Event, Washington 2009 and reproduced in Blueprint—Journal of the Emergency Planning Society (Autumn 2009), 22–24.Google Scholar
  7. Convery, I., Mort, M., Baxter, J., & Bailey, C. (2008). Animal Disease and Human Trauma. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dugdale, A. (1999). Materiality: Juggling Sameness and Difference. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and After (pp. 113–135). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, D., & McGuiness, M. (2002). Public Inquiry: Panacea or Placebo. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(1), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enarson, E. (2000). We Will Make Meaning Out of This: Women’s Cultural Responses to the Red River Valley Flood. International Journal of Emergency Management, 18(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
  11. Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in Its Path. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Eyre, A. (2007, December 14). Family First. Police Review, pp. 28–31.Google Scholar
  13. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of the Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harbers, H. (Ed.). (2005). Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-production of Technology and Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., & Wynne, B. (1996). Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Law, J. (Ed.). (1991). A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Law, J. (1994). Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Law, J. (2000). Ladbroke Grove, or How to Think About Failing Systems. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. Available at http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-ladbroke-grove-failing-systems.pdf as at September 1, 2011.
  19. Mackenzie, D. (1990). Inventing Accuracy. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  20. McLean, I., & Johnes, M. (2000). Aberfan: Government and Disasters. Cardiff: Welsh Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nesta. (2009). The Challenge of Co-production. Available at https://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/challenge-co-production as at June 1, 2012.
  22. O’Brien, G., & Read, P. (2005). Future UK Emergency Management New Wine, Old Skin? Disaster Prevention and Management, 14(3), 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinch, T., Ashmore, M., & Mulkay, M. (1992). ‘Technology, Testing, Text’: Clinical Budgeting in the UK National Health Service. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 265–289). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pitt, M. (2008). Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods: An Independent Review By Sir Michael Pitt. http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/pittreview/_/media/assets/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/flooding_review/pitt_review_full%20pdf.pdf as at July 4, 2009.
  25. Wells, C. (1995). Negotiating Tragedy Law and Disasters. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
  26. Whittle et al. (2010). Flood, Vulnerability and Urban Resilience: A Real-Time Study of Local Recovery Following the Floods of June 2007 in Hull. Project funded by Economic and Social Research Council, the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, and Environment Agency (October 2007–September 2009). Further project details including project report and data http://www.lec.lancs.ac.uk/cswm/Hull%20Floods%20Project/HFP_home.php as at December 1, 2010.
  27. Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology (pp. 44–83). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Recovery adviser and researcherDoncasterUK

Personalised recommendations