Advertisement

In Pursuit of the Plan: Ordering Devices in Disaster

  • Lucy EasthopeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This is a chapter about the attempts to bring order to the messy realities of life after disaster and the way that one formal attempt at ordering is undertaken through a process called emergency planning. More specifically, attempts to bring order to disaster settings in the UK are made through the use of emergency planning tools which I have labelled technologies and will go on to define below. Emergency plans are often developed at a distance and then provided to local actors for adaptation to local specificities.

References

  1. Academy for Community Leadership (ACL). (2008). Toll Bar on Sea. Published by Toll Bar Forum in association with Pontefract Press. [A collection of the testimonies of Toll Bar residents collected in 2007 immediately after the floods].Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, D. (2012). Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-disaster Recovery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  3. Ashmore, M., Mulkay, M., & Pinch, T. (1989). Health and Efficiency: A Sociology of Health Economics. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bloomfield, B., & Vurdubakis, T. (1997). Paper Traces: Inscribing Organizations and Information Technology. In B. Bloomfield, R. Coombs, D. Knights, & D. Littler (Eds.), Information Technology and Organizations: Strategies, Networks and Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabinet Office. (2009a). Emergency Response and Recovery Non Statutory Guidance Accompanying the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. Version Two (Updated July 2009) http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ukresilience/response.aspx as at August 18, 2010.
  6. Cabinet Office. (2009b). Civil Protection Lexicon. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/230446/lexicon.pdf as at June 1, 2010.
  7. Clarke, L. (1999). Mission Improbable. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Convery, I., Mort, M., Baxter, J., & Bailey, C. (2008). Animal Disease and Human Trauma. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easthope, L. (2008). Public Inquiries After Disaster: A Thematic Review of the Research. Project report commissioned by the Cabinet Office Emergency Planning College.Google Scholar
  10. Engledow, M. (2009, June). Tough Questions? Difficult Decisions? Is there a Need to Enhance the Role of the Private Sector in Emergencies. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of MSc in Emergency in Management and Planning, University of Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
  11. Harada, T. (2000). Space, Materials, and the ‘Social’ in the Aftermath of a Disaster. Environment and Planning D Society and Space, 18, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heath, C., Luff, P., & Svensson, M. (2003). Technology and Medical Practice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Law, J. (1994). Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Law, J. (2000). Ladbroke Grove, or How to Think About Failing Systems. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University. Available at http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-ladbroke-grove-failing-systems.pdf as at September 1, 2011.
  15. Law, J., & Mol, A. (2002). Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. North Carolina: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Brien, G., & Read, P. (2005). Future UK Emergency Management New Wine, Old Skin? Disaster Prevention and Management, 14(3), 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phillips, B. (2009). Disaster Recovery. Washington: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pinch, T., Ashmore, M., & Mulkay, M. (1992). Technology, Testing, Text: Clinical Budgeting in the UK National Health Service. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 265–289). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, A., Wild, C., & Law, J. (2005). The Barrow-in-Furness Legionnaires Outbreak: Qualitative Study of the Hospital Response and the Role of the Major Incident Plan. Emergency Medicine Journal, 22(4), 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Action (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Turner, B., & Pidgeon, N. (1997). Man Made Disasters. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  22. Walker, C., & Broderick, J. (2006). The Civil Contingencies Act 2004: Risk, Resilience and the Law in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Whittle et al. (2010). Flood, Vulnerability and Urban Resilience: A Real-Time Study of Local Recovery Following the Floods of June 2007 in Hull. Project funded by Economic and Social Research Council, the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, and Environment Agency (October 2007–September 2009). Further project details including project report and data http://www.lec.lancs.ac.uk/cswm/Hull%20Floods%20Project/HFP_home.php as at December 1, 2010.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Recovery adviser and researcherDoncasterUK

Personalised recommendations