Skip to main content

Really Reality?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bridging the Gap between Life and Physics
  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

We readdress duality, this time in the context of system entropy. It seems likely that life colonizes a state of lowest entropy between the extremes of duality. Birationality appears to be the natural descriptive medium for any and all entities in Nature, where complementarity always holds sway, and this presages a new view of reality: the duality of birationality results in a tripartite relativism between time, space and existence. We consider further Rosen’s (M,R) systems, and their relationship to inter-scalar regions of a model hierarchy, where they can provide a model for these complex regions. The ubiquitous nature of system duality means that a general evolution is omnipresent, as ‘everything is coupled to everything else’. We present as an example of Brenner’s emergence the generation of a biological phenotype from the dual combination of genome and environment, via epigenetic action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We reiterate that Brenner’s derivation is uniquely in terms of processes, but that we subscribe to Havel’s (1996) proposition that things, events and processes differ only in their relative timescales.

  2. 2.

    This assertion is related to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics (Busch et al. 2007), which sets out pairs of an entity ’s properties where the precision of definition of one is inversely dependent on the precision of definition of the other.

  3. 3.

    Note that we are here only indirectly referring to Einstein’s General Relativity , as one of the large family of different communicational relativistic phenomena .

References

  • Artmann, S. (2007). Computing codes versus interpreting life. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, J. E. (2008). Logic in reality. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P., Heinonen, T., & Lahti, P. (2007). Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Physics Reports, 452, 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, R., Ranson, W., & Vounckx, R. (1998). Emergence: Half a quantum jump? Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica: Mathematics and Computer Science Series Ma, 91, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, R., Ranson, W., & Vounckx, R. (2000). A diffuse biosemiotic model for cell-to-tissue computational closure. Biosystems, 55, 159–171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, R., Ranson, W., & Vounckx, R. (2003). Autocreative hierarchy II: Dynamics—self-organization, emergence and level-changing. In H. Hexmoor (Ed.), International conference on integration of knowledge intensive multi-agent systems (pp. 766–773). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (2014). Complexity and dynamical depth. Information, 5, 404–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbrück, M. (1986). Mind from matter? An essay on evolutionary epistemology, p. 167. Hoboken: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutowitz, H. A., & Langton, C. G. (1995). Mean field theory of the edge of chaos. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Artificial Life, Granada, Spain, June 4–6: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 929, pp. 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, I. M. (1996). Scale dimensions in nature. International Journal of General Systems 24, 295–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.), On semiotic modeling (pp. 187–196). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, B. V. S., Kenward, M., & Arya, G. (2011). Hierarchies in eukaryotic genome organization: Insights from polymer theory and simulations. BMC Biophysics. https://bmcbiophys.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-1682-4-8.

  • Linde, A. (1990). Particle physics and inflationary cosmology. Chur, CH: Harwood.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Louie, A. H. (2009). More than life itself: A synthetic continuation in relational biology. Berlin: Ontos Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (2012). In J. Rosen, J. J. Klineman, & M. Nadin (EDs.), Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsonis, A. A. (2008). Randomnicity. London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, R., Fransz, P. F., & Verschure, P. J. (2003). The eukaryotic genome: A system regulated at different hierarchical levels. Journal of Cell Science 116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Cottam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cottam, R., Ranson, W. (2017). Really Reality?. In: Bridging the Gap between Life and Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74533-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics