Skip to main content

What’s New? Temporality in Practice Theory and Pragmatism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter discusses two temporal approaches to social order that accentuate the role of novelty, change and temporality in accounts of social organization, activity and human action, namely, the pragmatist approach of George Herbert Mead and the practice theoretical approach of Theodore R. Schatzki. The chapter investigates how they conceive of novelty in their theoretical accounts. With this in mind, an empirical case from an organizational setting in the creative industry is introduced: the production of the film Antboy. To illustrate the points about novelty, the case is discussed with the conceptual resources put at our disposal by the two approaches to better understand how organizing for the future can in fact accommodate the processes of creativity that bring about novelty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This does not mean that normativity is absent in practice theoretical accounts—only that so-called regulist accounts of normativity are problematic. Joseph Rouse (2017) argues that practice theory must adopt a temporal conception of normativity: ‘What unifies a temporally extended social practice is not some feature that its individual performances have in common, but the mutual responsiveness of those performances over time.’

References

  • Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick. 1992. Time, Self, and Social Being. Temporality Within the Sociological Context. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, Anders, and Bente Elkjær. 2015. Pragmatism and Practice Theory. Convergences or Collisions. Paper Presented at the Conference of Organizational Learning, Knowledge, and Capabilities (OLKC2015), Milan, April 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, Anders, and Theodore Schatzki. forthcoming. Questions of Practice in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls, M.C.J., and E.F. Rietzschel. 2015. Organizing Creativity: Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management 24: 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, Robert. 2017. A Process-Philosophical Understanding of Organizational Learning as ‘Wayfinding’: Process, Practices, and Sensitivity to Environmental Affordances. The Learning Organization 24 (2): 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, Patrick, and Christopher Sykes. 2016. Organizational Change and Temporality. Bending the Arrow of Time. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1920/2008. In Reconstruction in Philosophy, The Middle Works, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938. Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, Barbara Simpson, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2016. The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. G. H. Mead. A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., M. Maoret, F. Massa, and S. Svejenova. 2012. Rebels with a Cause: Formation of the De Novo Category ‘Modern Architecture’. Organization Science 23: 1523–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J., T. Lant, and J. Shamsie. 2000. Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in Cultural Industries. Organization Science 11: 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, Ann, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George Herbert. 1932/2002. The Philosophy of the Present. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1934/1962. In Mind, Self, and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. C.W. Morris. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938/1972. The Philosophy of the Act, ed. C.W. Morris et al. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okrent, Mark. 1991. Heidegger’s Pragmatism. Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, Günter, and Jörg Sydow. 2017. Dancing in Chains: Creative Practices in/of Organizations. Organization Studies. Online First, August 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, Brent D. 2014. Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies 35: 551–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph. 2017. Normativity. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind, ed. Julian Kieverstein, 545–562. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, Theodore. 2002. The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The Timespace of Human Activity. On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Practice Theory as Flat Ontology. In Practice Theory and Research. Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, ed. Gert Spaargaren, Don Weenink, and Machiel Larmers, 28–42. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. forthcoming. On Plural Actions. In Practice, Practices, and Pragmatism. Perspectives from Philosophy and the Social Sciences, ed. Anders Buch and Theodore Schatzki. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjerne, Iben. 2016. Transcending Organization in Temporary Systems. Aesthetics’ Organizing Work and Employment in Creative Industries. PhD Series 50.2016, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stjerne, Iben, and Silviya Svejenova. 2016. Connecting Temporary and Permanent Organizing. Tensions and Boundary Work in a Series of Film Projects. Organization Studies 37 (12): 1771–1792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svec, Ondrej, and Jakub Capek. 2017. Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, John. 2016. What Is the Future? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnberg, N., and G. Gemser. 2000. Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts. Organization Science 11: 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buch, A., Stjerne, I.S. (2018). What’s New? Temporality in Practice Theory and Pragmatism. In: Krämer, H., Wenzel, M. (eds) How Organizations Manage the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74506-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics