Skip to main content

Environmental Sustainability: Stabilized Mud Block

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Ecology, Water Quality and Climate Change

Abstract

The urban ecosystem is considerably dependent on its surrounding areas; green enriches it and pollution degrades the same. Brick kilns are a common sight in any urban periphery. In the advent of rapid urbanization, the demand for brick as filler material of buildings has been increasing exponentially. Conventional burnt brick puts tremendous pressure on the environment, as the burning process results in lot of greenhouse gases. An alternative to burnt brick is the call of the day. However, alternatives such as hollow concrete/fly ash blocks are costly. The paper examines the case of stabilized mud blocks as filler material. These blocks do not need burning and thus save the ecosystem from burden of burning fossil/conventional fuel. The paper discusses the engineering viability of such stabilized mud blocks. The engineering properties of such blocks have been presented. The paper concludes that stabilized mud blocks are a viable alternative to conventional bricks with lot more intangible benefits attached to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Das BM (2004) Principles of foundation engineering 5E. Thomson, pp 704–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian Standard Code IS: 1725 (1982) Reaffirmed 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville AM, Brooks JJ (2010) Concrete technology, 2nd edn. Pearson, London, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Product Brochure, TARA, Development Alternatives, B-32, TARA Crescent, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi—110 016. www.devalt.org

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1962) Soil mechanics in engineering practices, Asia Publishing House, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practices. Wiley, New York, pp 16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatarama Reddy BV, Gupta A (2005) Characteristics of soil-cement blocks using highly sandy soils. Mater Struct 38(280):651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatarama Reddy BV, Latha MS (2014) Influence of soil grading on the characteristics of cement stabilized soil compacts. Mater Struct 47(10):1633–1645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker P (2004) Strength and erosion characteristics of earth blocks and earth block masonry. J Mater Civ Eng 16(5):497–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atanu Kumar Dutta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dutta, A.K., Deka, D., Hatibaruah, A., Goswami, D., Rai, S.S., Basumatary, T. (2018). Environmental Sustainability: Stabilized Mud Block. In: Sarma, A., Singh, V., Bhattacharjya, R., Kartha, S. (eds) Urban Ecology, Water Quality and Climate Change. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74494-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics