Advertisement

Introduction

  • Lisa Sugiura
Chapter
  • 109 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Cybercrime and Cybersecurity book series (PSCYBER)

Abstract

This chapter presents the issue of online medicine purchasing and outlines the rationale and aim of the book. The reader is introduced to a novel theoretical framework – respectable deviance, to understand how online medicine purchasing has been constructed and in responding to this, how consumers justify and manage their behaviours. The chapter also describes the methodology, including ethical considerations of undertaking online research. It concludes by summarising the key areas and definitions involved in online medicine purchasing.

Keywords

Pharmaceuticals Medicines World Wide Web Respectable deviance Regulation 

Bibliography

  1. Ackland, R. (2013). Web social science: Concepts, data and tools for social scientists in the digital age. Los Angeles/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Adamic, L., & Huberman, B. A. (1999). The nature of markets in the World Wide Web. Science, 287(5461) (2000), 2115.Google Scholar
  3. Aldridge, J., & Décary-Hétu, D. (2014). Not an ‘Ebay for Drugs’: The Cryptomarket ‘Silk Road’ as a paradigm shifting criminal innovation. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2436643
  4. Aldridge, J., & Décary-Hétu, D. (2016). Hidden wholesale: The drug diffusing capacity of online drug cryptomarkets. International Journal of Drug Policy, 35, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakardjieva, M. (2011). The internet in everyday life: Exploring the tenets and contributions of diverse approaches. In The handbook of internet studies (Vol. 11, p. 59). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barratt, M. J. (2011). Beyond internet as tool: A mixedmethods study of online drug discussion (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
  7. Barratt, M. J. (2012). Silk Road: eBay for drugs. Addiction, 107(3), 683–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bessell, T. L., Silagy, C. A., Anderson, J. N., Hiller, J. E., & Sansom, L. N. (2002). Quality of global e-pharmacies: Can we safeguard consumers? European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 58(9), 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloom, B. S., & Iannacone, R. C. (1999). Internet availability of prescription pharmaceuticals to the public. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(11), 830–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bostwick, J. M., & Lineberry, T. W. (2007). Do cheap internet drugs threaten the safety of the doctor–patient relationship? Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 6(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
  13. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society, and culture, The rise of the network society (Vol. I). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy, reflections on the internet, business and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Castells, M. (2011). The information age: Economy, society, and culture, The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Dutton, W., Helsper, E. J., & Gerber, M. M. (2009). Oxford internet surveys. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e20.Google Scholar
  18. Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace.Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Garden City.Google Scholar
  21. Halford, S., Pope, C., & Carr, L. (2010, April 26–27). A manifesto for web science. Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, Raleigh.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, A., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2016). Fake meds online: The internet and the transnational market in illicit pharmaceuticals. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Hendler, J., Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T., & Weitzner, D. (2008). Web science: An interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web. Communications of the ACM, 51(7), 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henney, J. E., Shuren, J. E., Nightingale, S. L., & McGinnis, T. J. (1999). Internet purchase of prescription drugs: Buyer beware. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(11), 861–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Israel, M. (2004). Ethics and the governance of criminological research in Australia. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.Google Scholar
  26. Kitchin, R. (1998). Cyberspace: The world in the wires. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Latter, S., Maben, J., Myall, M., & Young, A. (2007). Perceptions and practice of concordance in nurses’ prescribing consultations: Findings from a national questionnaire survey and case studies of practice in England. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laudon, K. C., & Traver, C. G. (2007). E-commerce. Boston: Pearson/Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  29. Lavorgna, A. (2014). The online trade in counterfeit pharmaceuticals: New criminal opportunities, trends and challenges. European Journal of Criminology.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814554722.
  30. Lavorgna, A. (2015). Organised crime goes online: Realities and challenges. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 18(2), 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lessig, L. (1996). The zones of cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 48, 1403–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books, University of Virgina.Google Scholar
  33. Markham, A. N. (1998). Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space (Vol. 6). Lanham: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  34. Markham, A. N. (2003). Metaphors reflecting and shaping the reality of the internet: Tool, place, way of being. Association of internet researchers conference, Toronto, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
  35. Markham, A. N. (2007). The internet as research context. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 328–344). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, J. (2014). Drugs on the dark net: How cryptomarkets are transforming the global trade in illicit drugs. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mills, D. (2016). Cybermedicine: The benefits and risks of purchasing drugs over the internet. Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 5(2), 1.Google Scholar
  38. Munro, G. S. (1991). Regulation of mail-order pharmacy. Journal of Legal Medicine, 12(1), 1–58. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murray, C. (1990). The British underclass. The Public Interest, 99, 4.Google Scholar
  40. Nie, N., & Ebring, L. (2000). Study offers early look at home internet is changing daily life. Retrieved March 18, 2007. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/7672099/nie%20and%20erbringinternet%20and%20society%20a%20preliminary%20report.pdf? AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1516286201&Signature=aVMhcaXywtLY8%2FSnuViEjHkPXv0%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DInternet_and_society.pdf
  41. Nutt, D. J., King, L. A. & Phillips, L. D. (2010). Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis. The Lancet, 376(9752), 1558–65.Google Scholar
  42. Pearson, G. (1983). Hooligan: A history of respectable fears. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pew Research Internet Project. (2008). Online shopping. http://www.pewinternet.org/2008/02/13/online-shopping/
  44. Scaria, V. (2003). Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs online. Online Journal of Health and Allied Science, 2(2). http://www.ojhas.org/issue6/2003-2-1.htm.
  45. Seeberg-Elverfeldt, N. J. (2009). Mail-order trade in medicines in Europe—A guide for legislators to protect consumers. European Journal of Health Law, 16(4), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, M. A., & Kollock, P. (Eds.). (1999). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2016). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720.
  48. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, 50–57.Google Scholar
  50. Webster, F. (2003). Information warfare in an age of globalization. In War and the media: Reporting conflict (Vol. 24(7), pp. 57–69). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weiss, A. M. (2006). Buying prescription drugs on the internet: Promises and pitfalls. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 73(3), 282–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2008). The internet in everyday life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Yar, M. (2006). Cybercrime and society. London: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Sugiura
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations