Abstract
The purpose of this study is recognizing and assessing the existing risks of SECA related investments of ship owners and the consideration of their risk attributes. Complying with the SECA regulations, maritime stakeholders have to choose among different abatement strategies, which are generally linked to high and risky investments. The paper focusses on the evaluation of scrubber technologies and their relationship to other abatement techniques.
Literature review reveals shortcomings in investment risk evaluation among the ship owners operating in emission control areas (ECA). The research fills this gap by presenting a comprehensive compilation of identified risks attributes in an analytical framework together with a risk assessment in the context of HFO and MGO fuel and scrubber related performance indicators comprising CAPEX and OPEX. The results in a classification framework categorize the investment risks and different elements of value at risk (VaR) as well as historical and parametric evaluation of risks. Besides that, this study contributes to new knowledge in the disciplines of green transport and shipping. For future research, the identified risk and investment must be tested in a real business case study and in different scenarios to measure and analyze its performance and efficiency.
The results of the paper are based on empiric activities, which were realized during 2017 in the frame of the EU project “EnviSuM”. The empiric measures comprise primary and secondary data analysis, focus group meetings and expert interviews with specialists from shipping sector in BSR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
IMO. Guidance on the application of regulation 13 of MARPOL annex VI tier III requirements to dual fuel and gas-fuelled engines. MEPC.1/Circ.854. London (2015)
Notteboom, T.: The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 10(1), 63–95 (2010)
Panagakos, G.P., Stamatopoulou, E.V., Psaraftis, H.N.: The possible designation of the Mediterranean Sea as a SECA: a case study. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 28, 74–90 (2014)
Olaniyi, E.O., Viirmäe, M.: The economic impact of environmental regulations on a maritime fuel production company. Res. Econ. Bus. Central Eastern Europe 8(2) (2016)
Olaniyi, E.O., Prause, G., Boyesan, J.: Economic impact of SECA regulations on clean shipping in the BSR: First empiric results from EnviSuM project (2017)
Basak, S., Shapiro, A.: Value-at-risk-based risk management: optimal policies and asset prices. Rev. Fin. Stud. 14(2), 371–405 (2001)
Acciaro, M.: Real option analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 28, 41–50 (2014)
Daduna, J.R., Prause, G.: The Baltic Sea as a maritime highway in international multimodal transport. In: Operations Research Proceedings 2015, pp. 189–194. Springer, Cham (2017)
Patricksson, Ø., Erikstad, S.O.: A two-stage optimization approach for sulphur emission regulation compliance. Marit. Policy Manag. 44(1), 94–111 (2017)
Bergqvist, R., Turesson, M., Weddmark, A.: Sulphur emission control areas and transport strategies-the case of Sweden and the forest industry. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 7(2), 10 (2015)
Hämäläinen, E., Hilmola, O.P., Prause, G., Tolli, A.: Forecasting maritime logistics costs – Will the low oil price remain? In: Serry, A., Lévêque, L. (eds.) Le transport maritime à courte distance (Short-Sea Shipping), Devport 2016 Conference, pp. 19–34. EMS Geodif, Le Havre, France (2016)
Herbst, A.F.: Capital Asset Investment: Strategy, Tactics and Tools. Wiley, New York (2003)
Hull, J., White, A.: Incorporating volatility updating into the historical simulation method for value-at-risk. J. Risk 1(1), 5–19 (1998)
Angelidis, T., Skiadopoulos, G.: Measuring the market risk of freight rates: a value-at-risk approach. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finan. 11(05), 447–469 (2008)
Dowd, K.: Measuring Market Risk. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)
Jorion, P.: Value at Risk (2000)
Baker, H.K., Haslem, J.A.: The impact of investor socioeconomic characteristics on risk and return preferences. J. Bus. Res. 2(4), 469–476 (1974)
Farid, J.A.: Risk Frameworks and Applications. Alchemy Technologies (2010)
Hendricks, D.: Evaluation of Value-At-Risk Models Using Historical Data (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Atari, S., Prause, G. (2018). Risk Assessment of Emission Abatement Technologies for Clean Shipping. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (eds) Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. RelStat 2017. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74453-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74454-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)