Introducing Fixed-Wing Aircraft into Cooperative UAV Collision Avoidance System

  • Dmitrijs LancovsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 36)


Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have become popular means of carrying light payloads for survey, mapping, delivery and various other purposes. Collision avoidance mechanisms are being actively researched, but non-cooperative solutions are still unreliable. A cooperative solution is required, based on commercial off-the-shelf hardware to provide this capability.

This system would be classified as “Class A” in manned aviation based on potential for human injury or death in case of failure, requiring a specific level of reliability.

A stepwise approach to designing such system was proposed, starting with initial operating range and then integrating various internal and external factors at each stage of modelling. UgCS mission planning and flight control software was used, and model was verified and validated.

First results of modelling for multicopter craft were produced, establishing operating ranges of ideal transmitter and receiver in a deterministic, noiseless environment, with a completely reliable channel.

This article introduces fixed-wing airframes into the simulation and updates initial operating range requirements, performing simulation across all the previous scenarios with fixed-wing UAV encounters against other fixed-wing UAVs as well as multicopters.

Initial operating range requirements were updated. No significant changes in operating range were observed, and it still is significantly shorter than that of automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B). Transmitters and receivers operating within this range exist and are used on commercial UAVs, albeit for different purposes, indicating that such system is feasible with current technology.


Unmanned aerial vehicles Automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast Unregulated airspace Collision avoidance system Simulation 


  1. 1.
    Lancovs, D.: On sharing of uncontrolled airspace for low flying unmanned aerial vehicle systems. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, pp. 214–222. Riga, Latvia (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moses, A., Rutherford, M.J., Kontitsis, M., Valavanis, K.P.: UAV-borne X-band radar for collision avoidance. Robotica 32(01), 97–114 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sabatini, R., Gardi, A., Richardson, M.A.: LIDAR obstacle warning and avoidance system for unmanned aircraft. Int. J. Mech. Aerosp. Ind. Mechatron. Manuf. Eng. 8(4), 718–729 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Youn, W.K., Hong, S.B., Oh, K.R., Ahn, O.S.: Software certification of safety-critical avionic systems: DO-178C and its impacts. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 30(4), 4–13 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lancovs, D.: Building, verifying and validating a collision avoidance model for unmanned aerial vehicles. Procedia Eng. 178, 155–161 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    SPH Engineering, Universal Ground Control Software. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
  7. 7., Pixhawk autopilot. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
  8. 8.
    Costin, A., Francillon, A.: Ghost in the air (traffic): on insecurity of ADS-B protocol and practical attacks on ADS-B devices. In: Proceedings of Black Hat USA 2012 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations