The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): Prospects for Application in Supply Chain Management

  • Valery LukinskiyEmail author
  • Vladislav Lukinskiy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 36)


The most expedient way, in our opinion, to generalize the numerous AHP studies is by the formatting of a morphological table and the corresponding block diagram. On the basis of the table, it is possible to take into account unobvious variants that can be missed with a simple search. Thus, the AHP, despite its obvious benefits, requires further research so as it can be successfully applied in the management of supply chains.


Decision making Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)  Supply chain 


  1. 1.
    Beria, P., Maltese, I., Mariotti, I.: Multicriteria versus cost benefit analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 4, 137–152 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J.: Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process. McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., New York (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cancela, J., Fico, G., Waldmeyer, M.: Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to understand the most important factors to design and evaluate a telehealth system for Parkinson’s disease. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 15(Suppl 3), S7 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dulange, S.R., Pundir, A.K., Ganapathy, L.: Prioritization of factors impacting on performance of power looms using AHP. J. Ind. Eng Int. 10, 217–227 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gogas, M., Papoutsis, K., Nathanail, E.: Optimization of decision-making in port logistics terminals: using analytic hierarchy process for the case of port of Thessaloniki. Transp. Telecommun. 15(4), 255–268 (2014). Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamidy, N., Alipur, H., Nasab, S., Yazdani, A., Shojaei, S.: Spatial evaluation of appropriate areas to collect runoff using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS). Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2, 172 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kabashkin, I., Lučina, J.: Development of the model of decision support for alternative choice in the transportation transit system. Transp. Telecommun. 16(1), 61–72 (2015). Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lukinskiy, V.S., Lukinskiy, V.V.: Analysis of the logistics intermediaries choice methods in the supply chains. Transp. Telecommun. 16(4), 288–295 (2015). Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saaty, T., Vargas, L.: Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Oper. Res. 46(4), 491–502 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saaty, T.: Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 145, 85–91 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saaty, T., Vargas, L., Dellmann, K.: The allocation of intangible resources: the analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Soc. Econ. Plan. Sci. 37, 169–184 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saaty, T.: Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 168, 557–570 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saaty, T., Shang, J.: Group decision-making: head-count versus intensity of preference. Soc. Econ. Plan. Sci. 41, 22–37 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saaty, T.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saaty, T.: Neurons the decision makers, Part I: the firing function of a single neuron. Neural Netw. 86, 102–114 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taha, H.: Operations Research: An Introduction, 9th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wiethoff, M., Brookhuis, K., Waard, D., Marchau, V., Walta, L., Wenzel, G., Brucker, K., Macharis, K.: A methodology for improving road safety by novel infrastructural and invehicle technology combinations. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 4, 67–77 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations