Advertisement

Multi Criteria Decision Making in Life Cycle Management of Modular Ships with Test System

  • Igor KabashkinEmail author
  • Andrejs Zvaigzne
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 36)

Abstract

Modular construction is one of the popular methods used in shipbuilding industry. The modular ship construction (MSC) requires better than normal quality assurance that must be provided with special product testing. Test-related information is generated throughout the product life cycle for each level in the system hierarchy. The present paper introduces a multi-level decision-making approach for design of optimal test architecture for achieving efficient system for lowering life-cycle cost of modular ship construction. The effectiveness of such approach is investigated through the optimization of test system architecture for known reliability and economic dependence during life cycle of MSC.

Keywords

Modular ships Life cycle Test system 

References

  1. 1.
    Deschamps, L., Trumbule, J.: Cost Estimation, Ship Design and Construction. SNAME (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertram, V., Maisonneuve, J., Caprace, J., Rigo P.: Cost Assessment in Ship Production. RINA (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caprace, J.D., Rigo, P.: Multi-criteria decision support for cost assessment techniques in shipbuilding industry. https://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/9967/1/03_Caprace.pdf. (Accessed 09 June 2017)
  4. 4.
    Brown, A., Salcedo, J.: Multiple-objective optimization in naval ship design. Naval Eng. J. 115(4), 49–62 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Landamore, M., Birmingham R., Downie, M.: Establishing the economic and environmental life cycle costs of marine systems: a case study from the recreational craft sector (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Project SUSPRO – Decision support for sustainable ship production in global fluctuating markets. https://www.ntnu.no/suspro. (Accessed 09 June 2017)
  7. 7.
    Tan, W., Sauser, B., Ramirez-Marquez, J., Magnaye, R.: Multiobjective optimization in multifunction multicapability system development planning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 43(4), 785–800 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zvaigzne, A., Bondarenko, O., Boiko, A.: Decision support system on the base of genetic algorithm for optimal design of a specialized maritime platform. Comput. Model. New Technol. 21(2), 11–18 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guerran, A., Jenssen, M.: Multi Criteria Decision Analysis in the Norwegian Maritime Sector. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azizie, M.: Shipbuilding technology modular construction and lean shipbuilding construction. https://ru.scribd.com/doc/50574298/Shipbuilding-Technology-Modular-Construction-and-Lean-Shipbuilding-Construction. (Accessed 09 June 2017)
  11. 11.
    Anuar, A.: Slipway and modular ship construction. https://ru.scribd.com/document/224405669/Slipway-and-modular-ship-construction. (Accessed 09 June 2017)
  12. 12.
    Deschamps, L. Extended modularization of ship design & build strategy. In: Shipbuilding Opportunities in Short Sea Shipping Workshop, 21–23 October, Charleston, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zvaigzne, A., Pollaks, K., Pavlovics, A.: Multi-criteria decision making for oil pollution recovery module for swath multifunctional special ships. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res. (IJMER) 7(3), 41–49 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kabashkin, I.: Design of embedded architecture for integrated diagnostics in avionics domain. Procedia Eng. 178, 419–426 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freise, A.: The value of easy-to-use products, pictures of the future, p. 65. Siemens (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Latvian Maritime AcademyRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations