Advertisement

Estimation and Evaluation of Risk in the Railway Infrastructure

  • Piotr SmoczyńskiEmail author
  • Adam Kadziński
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 36)

Abstract

Management of railway infrastructure in the European Union (EU) must be performed in accordance with the regulations of the Railway Safety Directive, i.e. it must be covered by a safety management system. The legislation specifies criteria which must be met by such a system, the first being the implementation of risk-related tools. Unfortunately, most of the internationally recognized research is either too general or too specific for direct application in the areas where safety management is still under development and there are not enough resources for complex reliability analyses. Therefore, in the paper, we show a proposal of a relatively simple risk model designed for estimation and evaluation of risk, which could be applied by railway infrastructure maintenance staff to identify the most urgent needs for maintenance works. For this reason, we propose to virtually split railway lines into segments of several types, according to their accessibility by emergency services. As a result, the criteria used in the model for risk estimation can better reflect the reality.

Keywords

Risk analysis Safety management systems Railway infrastructure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

All presented work is realized within the research project “Contemporary problems of operation, maintenance and safety of rail transportation systems”, No. 05/52/DSMK/0266, co-financed by the Dean of the Faculty of Machines and Transport, Poznan University of Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Hale, A.R., Heming, B.H.J., Carthey, J., Kirwan, B.: Modelling of safety management systems. Saf. Sci. 26, 121–140 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koursi, E.M.E., Mitra, S., Bearfield, G.: Harmonising safety management systems in the European railway sector. Saf. Sci. Monit. 11, 1–14 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Directive (EU) 2016/798 of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (recast). European Parliament and Council (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Čičmancová, S.: Safety and risk as part of railway system. Trans. VŠB - Tech. Univ. Ostrava, Saf. Eng. Ser. 8 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leitner, B.: A general model for railway systems risk assessment with the use of railway accident scenarios analysis. Procedia Eng. 187, 150–159 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chruzik, K., Sitarz, M.: Investigation and development of safety measures in the European Union railway transport. Mechanika 20, 431–437 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Demichela, M., Piccinini, N., Romano, A.: Risk analysis as a basis for safety management system. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 17, 179–185 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Podofillini, L., Zio, E., Vatn, J.: Risk-informed optimisation of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 20–35 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vatn, J., Aven, T.: An approach to maintenance optimization where safety issues are important. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 58–63 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smoczyński, P., Kadziński, A.: Introduction to the risk management in the maintenance of railway tracks. J. Mech. Transp. Eng. 68, 65–80 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andrews, J., Prescott, D., De Rozières, F.: A stochastic model for railway track asset management. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 130, 76–84 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macchi, M., Garetti, M., Centrone, D., Fumagalli, L., Piero Pavirani, G.: Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 104, 71–83 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bureika, G., Bekintis, G., Liudvinavicius, L., Vaiciunas, G.: Applying analytic hierarchy process to assess traffic safety risk of railway infrastructure. Eksploat. i Niezawodn. - Maint. Reliab. 15, 376–383 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC 60812:2006 Analysis techniques for system reliability - Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: PN-N-18002:2011 Systemy zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy. Ogólne wytyczne do oceny ryzyka zawodowego (2011). [in Polish]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kadziński, A.: Studium wybranych aspektów niezawodności systemów oraz obiektów pojazdów szynowych [in Polish]. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marais, K.B., Robichaud, M.R.: Analysis of trends in aviation maintenance risk: an empirical approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 106, 104–118 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Decision of 5 June 2009 on the adoption of a common safety method for assessment of achievement of safety targets, as referred to in Article 6 of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Commission of the European Communities (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Urząd Transportu Kolejowego: Raport w sprawie bezpieczeństwa transportu kolejowego w Polsce w 2015 roku., Warszawa (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lichtberger, B.: Track Compendium: Formation, Permanent Way, Maintenance, Economics. Eurailpress (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A.: Warunki techniczne utrzymania nawierzchni na liniach kolejowych (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minister Transportu i Gospodarki Morskiej: Rozporządzenie Ministra Transportu i Gospodarki Morskiej z dnia 10 września 1998 r. w sprawie warunków technicznych, jakim powinny odpowiadać budowle kolejowe i ich usytuowanie (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kobaszyńska-Twardowska, A., Kadziński, A.: The model of railway crossings as areas of analyses of hazard risk management. Logist. Transp. 85–92 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hokstad, P., Steiro, T.: Overall strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulations. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 100–111 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Poznan University of TechnologyPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations