Advertisement

Smart and Sustainable Cross-Sectoral Stakeholder Integration into Macro-Regional LNG Value Chain

  • Laima Gerlitz
  • Robert PhilippEmail author
  • Anatoli Beifert
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 36)

Abstract

Since the introduction of lower sulphur content with no more than 0.10% in the Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) from 1 January 2015, the Baltic Sea Region (BSR) is increasingly becoming subject to search for new economically and environmentally competitive and survival strategies. The BSR stands for a flagship maritime region in Europe in terms of good economic, social and environmental performance. In order to sustain, and much more important, to improve the overall eco-system performance of the BSR, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) has been recognised as one of transitional measures, alternative strategies and business opportunities in maritime shipping and the entire transportation and energy system. LNG might become a viable stepping-stone alternative solution for business, and be considered as a regulation-driven demand to comply with environmental regulations that aim to achieve the goals set by 2020–2050. As a response, ‘Go LNG’ ERDF part-financed INTERREG V project aims at reducing technological, knowledge and business gaps by providing operational and strategic approach. In line with project, the present study aims to answer the research question how to integrate LNG stakeholders involved in diverse LNG activities, with different needs, capacities and capabilities into one macro-regional transport and energy supply and value chain.

Keywords

LNG Value chain Alternative fuel Strategy Cluster 

References

  1. 1.
    Alhosalo, M., Karppinen, A.: Kaasua Satakunta, Selvitys nesteytetyn maakaasun (LNG) liiketoimintamahdollisuuksista Satakunnassa. A report on the business possibilities of liquified natural gas in Satakunta region. Turun yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulun Porin yksikön julkaisusarja A, nro A43/2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersson, G.: Rethinking regional innovation. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 26(1), 99–110 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asheim, B.T., Coenen, L.: Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters. Res. Policy 34(8), 1173–1190 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagniewski, M.: LNG Fuel for Ships: A Chance or a Must?. Det Norske Veritas. Gdynia, Poland (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beer, T., Grant, T., Williams, D., Watson, H.: Fuel-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from alternative fuels in Australian heavy vehicles. Atmos. Environ. 36(4), 753–763 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beifert, A., Prause, G.: Logistic innovation networks in the Southern Baltic Sea Region. In: Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2009, 5th International Conference-Kalmar, Sweden, September 14–15, 2009, vol. 3, p. 3. BWV Verlag (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beifert, A., Gerlitz, L., Prause, G.: Sustainable business development models for regional airports. In: Kersten, W., Blecker, T., Ringle, C. (eds.) Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains (Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL)), pp. 256–284. epubli GmbH, Berlin (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cameron, D., With, H.M., Skjerven, Ø., Hyllseth, M., MannsåKer, P.: Integrated distributed dynamic simulation of the LNG value chain: concepts and experience. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 83(6), 686–691 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castillo, L., Dorao, C.A.: Consensual decision-making model based on game theory for LNG processes. Energy Convers. Manag. 64, 387–396 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheenkachorn, K., Poompipatpong, C., Ho, C.G.: Performance and emissions of a heavy-duty diesel engine fuelled with diesel and LNG (liquid natural gas). Energy 53, 52–57 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 128–152 (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooke, P.: Introduction: origins of the concept. In: Teoksessa Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (eds.) Regional Innovation Systems (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooke, P.: Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind. Corp. Change 10(4), 945–974 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daduna, J., Prause, G.: The Baltic Sea as a maritime highway in international multimodal transport. In: Doerner, K., Ljubic, I., Pflug, G., Tragler, G. (eds.) Operations Research Proceedings 2015, pp. 189–194, Springer, Berlin (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42902-1
  16. 16.
    Delgado, M., Porter, M.E., Stern, S.: Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Res. Policy 43(10), 1785–1799 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doloreux, D.: What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technol. Soc. 24(3), 243–263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg. Manag. J. 1105–1121 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Foss, M.M.: An overview on liquefied natural gas (LNG), its properties, the LNG industry, and safety considerations (2012). http://www.beg.utexas.edu/energyecon/INTRODUCTION%20TO%20LNG%20Update%202012.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017
  20. 20.
    Gerlitz, L.: Design for product and service innovation in industry 4.0 and emerging smart society. J. Secur. Sustain. Issues 5(2) (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gerlitz, L.: Design-driven innovation in SMEs: smart and sustainable organisation within industrial transformation. Int. J. Environ. Policy Decis. Mak. 2(2), 98–124 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gerlitz, L., Paulauskas, V.: Emerging LNG Value Chain in the South Baltic Sea Region (2015). http://martech.golng.eu/files/Main/PDF/2015.06.17_Joint_LNG_Study_consolidated.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017
  23. 23.
    Holbrook, A., Salazar, M.: Regional innovation systems within a federation: do national policies affect all regions equally? Innovation 6(1), 50–64 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    International Transport Forum at the OECD: Global Trade: International Freight Transport to Quadruple by 2050. ITF, Paris (2015). https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/2015-01-27-outlook2015.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Kogut, B., Zander, U.: Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 383–397 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krugman, P.: Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Polit. Econ. 99(3), 483–499 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krugman, P.: Space: the final frontier. J. Econ. Perspect. 12(2), 161–174 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar, S., Kwon, H.T., Choi, K.H., Cho, J.H., Lim, W., Moon, I.: Current status and future projections of LNG demand and supplies: a global prospective. Energy Policy 39(7), 4097–4104 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kumar, S., Kwon, H.T., Choi, K.H., Lim, W., Cho, J.H., Tak, K., Moon, I.: LNG: an eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development. Appl. Energy 88(12), 4264–4273 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Madjidian, J., Gerlitz, L., Paulauskas, V., Henesey, L., Ölcer, A., Dalaklis, D., Ballini, F., Kitada, M.: Developing a strategy for LNG powered transport corridors in the Baltic Sea Region. In: Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on Maritime Energy Management, Malmö, Sweden, World Maritime University, Springer Verlag (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mattli, W.: The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Metzger, J., Schmitt, P.: When soft spaces harden: the EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Environ. Plan. A 44(2), 263–280 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore. Singapore’s LNG Terminal Starts Commercial Operations (2013). https://www.slng.com.sg/website/binarystream_processor.aspx?T=oHrZIePy%2F%2FIsmOw4n0HfkA%3D%3D&C=3nZ502kqfj3GSxT9GjBmJQ%3D%3D&PK=dt3HyIwl7xY%3D&K=01C351&SC=1. Accessed 23 June 2017
  35. 35.
    Mohapatra, S.: IT and porter’s competitive forces model and strategies. In: Information Systems Theory, pp. 265–281. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Olaniyi, E.O., Prause, G.: The impact of environmental regulations on regional development in Eastern Estonia. In: Muravska, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference New Challenges of Economic and Business Development – 2017. Latvian State University, Riga (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Olaniyi, E., Prause, G., Boyesen, J.: The impact of SECA regulations on clean shipping in the BSR: first empiric results from EnviSuM project. In: Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on Maritime Energy Management, Malmö, Sweden, World Maritime University, Springer Verlag (2017)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pitt, M.E., Eide, M.S., Brathagen, S., Dimopoulos, G.: Natural gas versus diesel power for ships–a technical review, also considering economic aspects. DNV, Norway (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Porter, M.E.: How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 57(2), 137–145 (1979)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Porter, M.E.: What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 6, 61–78 (1996)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Porter, M.E.: Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ. Dev. Q. 14(1), 15–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Porter, M.E.: The value chain and competitive advantage. Underst. Bus. Process. 50–66 (2001)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Porter, M., Kramer, M.R.: Creating shared value. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(1/2), 62–77 (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rüster, S., Neumann, A.: Corporate strategies along the LNG value added chain-an empirical analysis of the determinants of vertical integration. In: Globalization of Natural Gas Markets Working Papers, WP-GG-17. German Institute for Economic Research (2006)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 509–533 (1997)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    TIAX: US and Canadian Natural Gas Vehicle Market Analysis: Liquefied Natural Gas Infrastructure. Lexington, MA (2012). http://louisianacleanfuels.org/images/downloads/Reports/lng_infrastructure.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2017
  47. 47.
    Tzannatos, E., Nikitakos, N.: Natural gas as a fuel alternative for sustainable domestic passenger shipping in Greece. Int. J. Sustain. Energ. 32(6), 724–734 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Verbeek, R.P., Kadijk, G., van Mensch, P., Wulffers, C., van den Beemt, B., Fraga, F., Aalbers, A.D.A.: Environmental and economic aspects of using LNG as a fuel for shipping in The Netherlands. TNO, Delft (2011)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wernerfelt, B.: The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strateg. Manag. J. 16(3), 171–174 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wood, D.A.: A review and outlook for the global LNG trade. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 9, 16–27 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yoo, B.Y.: Economic assessment of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel for CO2 carriers compared to marine gas oil (MGO). Energy 121, 772–780 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laima Gerlitz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert Philipp
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Anatoli Beifert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business Administration, Wismar Business SchoolHochschule Wismar, University of Applied Sciences: Technology, Business and DesignWismarGermany
  2. 2.Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations