Skip to main content

Tocqueville’s Great Party Politics and the Election of Donald Trump

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trump and Political Philosophy

Abstract

Although Tocqueville would be personally appalled at Trump’s vulgarity, he would support much of Trump’s political program, based on Democracy in America’s distinction between “great parties” (which defend high principles) and “small parties” (which engage in interest group politics). First, Tocqueville believed that a nation should cultivate its own particular identity, and thus so should the United States, while still welcoming those who can and will become part of the American project. Second, Tocqueville admired American townships’ capacity for self-government, which contrasts with the unaccountability of the federal bureaucracy. Trump is attempting to undercut the pernicious growth of the administrative state. The Progressives and the New Deal embraced ideas from Hegel, and thus transformed American government so that it now resembles the European welfare state. This development has undercut American freedom. Finally, Tocqueville would also support Trump’s call for restoring American power and prestige, for greatness is a national project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    George Wilson Pierson. 1938. Tocqueville in America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Paperback edition, 1966.

  2. 2.

    All citations to Democracy in America are from the translation by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. 2000. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  3. 3.

    For an opposing view, see David Gelernter, “The Conservative ‘Resistance’ Is Futile,” The Wall Street Journal, July 6, 2017, A15.

  4. 4.

    Samuel P. Huntington. 2005. Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity. London: Simon & Schuster.

  5. 5.

    Abraham Lincoln. 2012. “Speech at Chicago,” July 10, 1858, in The Writings of Abraham Lincoln. Ed., Steven B. Smith . New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 148.

  6. 6.

    Two examples might be statements by Linda Sarsour, former executive director of the Arab American Association of New York, and LosUnidos, formerly the National Council of La Raza.

  7. 7.

    “Illegal, Undocumented, Unauthorized: The Terms of Immigration Reporting,” Stephen Hiltner, The New York Times, March 10, 2017.

  8. 8.

    Pierre Manent . 2013. A World Beyond Politics? A Defense of the Nation-State. Trans. Marc A. LePain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, reprint edition.

  9. 9.

    See, for example, NPR’s report on Trump’s speech at Liberty University in January 2016, where he mistakenly referred to “Two Corinthians,” instead of “Second Corinthians.” “Citing ‘Two Corinthians,’ Trump Struggles To Make The Sale To Evangelicals,” January 18, 2016. http://www.npr.org/people/404496424/jessica-taylor.

  10. 10.

    Cited in The Tocqueville Reader, Eds. Olivier Zunz and Alan Kahan. 2002. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd., pp. 227–229.

  11. 11.

    See esp. The Progressive Revolution in Politics and Political Science: Transforming the American Regime. 2005. John Marini and Ken Masugi, eds. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  12. 12.

    Thomas Jefferson , Notes on the State of Virginia, cited in Federalist # 48, p. 307. See also Federalist # 47, where Madison observes that “the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” p. 298. The Federalist Papers . 2003. Ed. Clinton Rossiter, with Introduction and Notes by Charles R. Kesler. New York: Signet Classics.

  13. 13.

    Phillip Hamburger , 2014. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  14. 14.

    Among the Declaration’s indictments against King George III is this: “He has erected a Multitude of new Offices , and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their Substance.”

  15. 15.

    Jean M. Yarbrough, Theodore Roosevelt and the American Political Tradition. 2012. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, pp. 163–169.

  16. 16.

    For Tocqueville’s analysis of the “coarse” spirit and “sketchy” education of American journalists, DA 177. For the journalistic call to arms against Trump as candidate, see Jim Rutenberg, New York Times, August 7, 2016.

  17. 17.

    Catherine Rampell, “Millennials have a higher opinion of socialism that of capitalism,” Washington Post, February 5, 2016.

  18. 18.

    Zunz and Kahan, pp. 223, 236.

  19. 19.

    The phrase, which dates back to 2000, is variously attributed to Don Eberly and Bruce Chapman.

  20. 20.

    “The Port Huron Statement,” issued by Students for a Democratic Society in 1962 advised young radicals not to bother trying to win control of the Democratic Party, but to take over the universities. On the success of this project, see Roger Kimball. 1990. Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Higher Education. New York: HarperCollins and The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America. 2000. San Francisco: Encounter Books.

Bibliography

  • Hamburger, Phillip. 2014. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Alexander, and et al. 2003. The Federalist Papers. Edited by Clinton Rossiter, with an Introduction and Notes by Charles R. Kesler. New York: Signet Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 2005. Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, Roger. 1990. Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Higher Education. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America. San Francisco: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Abraham. 2012. The Writings of Abraham Lincoln, ed. Steven B. Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manent, Pierre. 2013. A World Beyond Politics? A Defense of the Nation-State, Trans. Marc LePain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, John, and Ken Masugi, eds. 2005. The Progressive Revolution in Politics and Political Science: Transforming the American Regime. Lanham: Rowman & Littelfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, George Wilson. 1968. Tocqueville in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Paperback. [orig. pub. 1938].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000. Democracy in America, Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The Tocqueville Reader: A Life in Letters and Politics, ed. Olivier Zunz and Alan S. Kahan. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, Jean M. 2012. Theodore Roosevelt and the American Political Tradition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yarbrough, J.M. (2018). Tocqueville’s Great Party Politics and the Election of Donald Trump. In: Sable, M., Torres, A. (eds) Trump and Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74427-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics