Mitigation Challenges for China’s End-Use Sectors Under a Global Below Two Degree Target

  • Wenying Chen
  • Huan Wang
  • Jingcheng Shi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 64)


To achieve a global below 2° climate target, every country would need to promote low-carbon transitions in their energy system. The biggest developing country, China, will face a particularly severe challenge to balance the increasing energy demand and the CO2 mitigation required by a below 2° target. Based on the energy system optimization results generated by a 14-region global TIMES model, this chapter aims to analyze the key challenges for China’s end-use sectors. Under the stringent CO2 emission constraint, significant improvements in energy efficiency and changes in energy structure resulting from electrification are expected to be achieved in the building, transportation and industry sectors. The penetration of high-efficient technologies requires the implementation of sufficient incentives like targeted policies or market mechanisms. Electrification needs the availability of abundant and stable electricity supply for end-use sectors since demand will increase rapidly.



This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 71690243) and Ministry of Science and Technology (2012BAC20B01).


  1. Bauer N, Calvin K et al (2017) Shared socio-economic pathways of the energy sector—quantifying the narratives. Glob Environ Change 42:316–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen W (2005) The costs of mitigating carbon emissions in China: findings from China MARKAL-MACRO modeling. Energy Policy 33(7):885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen W, Li H, Wu Z (2010) Western China energy development and west to east energy transfer: Application of the Western China sustainable energy development model. Energy Policy 38(11):7106–7120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen W, Yin X, Ma D (2014) A bottom-up analysis of China’s iron and steel industrial energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Appl Energy 136:1174–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen W, Wu Z, He J, Gao P, Xu S (2007) Carbon emission control strategies for China: a comparative study with partial and general equilibrium versions of the China MARKAL model. Energy 32(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen W, Yin X, Zhang H (2016) Towards low carbon development in China: a comparison of national and global models. Clim Change 136(1):95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fricko O, Havlik P et al (2017) The marker quantification of the Shared socioeconomic pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. Glob Environ Change 42:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anandarajah G, Pye S, Usher W, Kesicki F, Mcglade C (2011) TIAM-UCL global model documentation. University College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. IPCC (2015) Climate Change 2014 mitigation of climate changeGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang L, Neill BCO (2015) Global urbanization projections for the shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob Environ Change 42:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kc S, Lutz W (2014) The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob Environ Change 42:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kriegler E, Neill BCO et al (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Glob Environ Change 22(4):807–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leimbach M, Kriegler E, Roming N, Schwanitz J (2015) Future growth patterns of world regions—a GDP scenario approach. Glob Environ Change 42:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li H, Wei Y (2015) Is it possible for China to reduce its total CO2 emissions? Energy 83:438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Z (2015) Steps to China’s carbon peak. Nature 522(7556):279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loulou R, Labriet M (2008) ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: model structure. CMS 5(1–2):7–40CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Riahi K, van Vuuren DP et al (2017) The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob Environ Change 42:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi J, Chen W, Yin X (2016) Modelling building’s decarbonization with application of China TIMES model. Appl Energy 162:1303–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E et al (2014) A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture. Clim Change 122(3):373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. World Bank Group (2017) The World bank dataGoogle Scholar
  21. Yin X, Chen W (2013) Trends and development of steel demand in China: a bottom–up analysis. Resources Policy 38(4):407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang H, Chen W, Huang W (2016) TIMES modelling of transport sector in China and USA: comparisons from a decarbonization perspective. Appl Energy 162:1505–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Energy, Environment and EconomyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations