Advertisement

The Canadian Contribution to Limiting Global Warming Below 2 °C: An Analysis of Technological Options and Regional Cooperation

  • Kathleen Vaillancourt
  • Olivier Bahn
  • Oskar Sigvaldason
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 64)

Abstract

Canada committed to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 30% below 2005 levels by 2030, and by 70–90% below 2005 levels by 2050. These challenging commitments require special consideration of the energy sector in Canada. The main objective of this chapter is to identify different decarbonization pathways that would allow Canada to participate in global mitigation efforts to prevent climate changes. We analyze four GHG mitigation scenarios with increasing levels of mitigation efforts for 2050 using the NATEM regional optimization model. The main transformations in the energy system include significant energy conservation and efficiency improvements, greater penetration of electricity in all end-use sectors (up to 64% of total consumption in 2050), as well as an important increased use of bioenergy in 2050. On the supply side, this translates into a rapid decarbonization of electricity production and a shift away from fossil fuel production and imports. In addition, our results show that Canada would benefit from achieving greater cooperation between jurisdictions because of the large diversity in the composition of regional energy systems. Finally, this application demonstrates the merits of using a comprehensive optimization model for identifying the best mitigation options for achieving the national contribution to international agreement while taking into account regional particularities.

References

  1. Bahn O, Edwards N, Knutti R, Stocker TF (2011) Energy policies avoiding a tipping point in the climate system. Energy Policy 39:334–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boothe P, Boudreault FA (2016) By the numbers: Canadian GHG emissions. Ivey Business School at Western University, Lawrence National Centre for Policy and Management, p 15Google Scholar
  3. EIA—Energy Information administration (2014) Annual energy outlook 2014—energy outlook database. U.S. Department of Energy [Online]. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/data/browser/
  4. Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016a) Canada’s mid-century long term low greenhouse gas development strategy. Canada’s Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 87 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016b) Pan-Canadian framework on clean growth and climate change: Canada’s plan to address climate change and grow of the economy. 78 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Environment Canada (2013) Reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired generation of electricity regulations. Can Gaz 145(3) and 146(19)Google Scholar
  7. Environment Canada (2016) National inventory report: greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada 1990–2014—executive summary. Canada’s Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 15 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Environment Canada (2017) National inventory report 1990–2015: GHG sources and sinks in Canada—executive summary [Online]. http://www.ec.gc.ca/ges-ghg/default.asp?lang=En&n=662F9C56-1
  9. Government of Canada (2010) Renewable fuels regulation. Can Gaz 144(18)Google Scholar
  10. Loulou R, Goldstein G, Kanudia A, Lehtila A, Remme U (2016) Documentation for the TIMES model, energy technology systems analysis program (ETSAP) of the international energy agency (IEA) [Online]. http://iea-etsap.org/docs/Documentation_for_the_TIMES_Model-Part-II_July-2016.pdf
  11. Manne A, Mendelsohn R, Richels R (1995) MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Natural Resources Canada (2017). Energy fact book 2016–2017 [Online]. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/energy/pdf/EnergyFactBook_2016_17_En.pdf
  13. NHTSA—National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2011) Summary of fuel economy performance. US department of transportationGoogle Scholar
  14. NREL—National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2013) Non-hardware (“soft”) cost-reduction roadmap for residential and small commercial solar photovoltaics, 2013–2020 [Online]. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/59155.pdf
  15. TEFP—Trottier Energy Futures Project (2016) Canada’s challenge and opportunity—transformations for major reductions in GHG emissions [Online]. http://iet.polymtl.ca/en/tefp
  16. UNFCCC—United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2016) Canada’s INDC submission to the UNFCCC [Online]. http://www4.unfccc.int/Submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Canada/1/INDC%20-%20Canada%20-%20English.pdf
  17. Vaillancourt K, Bahn O, Frenette E, Sigvaldason O (2017) Exploring deep decarbonization pathways to 2050 for Canada using an optimization energy model framework. Appl Energy 195:774–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. World Resources Institute (2017) Climate analysis indicators tool 2017 [Online]. http://www.ec.gc.ca/ges-ghg/default.asp?lang=En&n=662F9C56-1. Accessed Oct 2017)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Vaillancourt
    • 1
  • Olivier Bahn
    • 2
  • Oskar Sigvaldason
    • 3
  1. 1.ESMIA ConsultantsBlainville, QuébecCanada
  2. 2.GERAD and Department of Decision SciencesHEC MontréalMontréal, QuébecCanada
  3. 3.SCMS GlobalToronto, OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations