Abstract
In this chapter, we propose to explore the conditions under which a stringent target of 1.5 °C—written into the Paris Agreement in December 2015—may be fulfilled at a country level, France, while focusing on energy issues. The analysis horizon spans to 2072 in reference to the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth publication, 2072 being the neutral target. To this end, we explore the impact of two contrasting lifestyles for France: the first, named digital, represents an individualistic and technological society, whereas the second, named collective, depicts a society with strong social ties and cooperation between citizens. These scenarios are assessed through different models, each one representing a particular aspect: lifestyles, economy and technologies. While technology-oriented energy models usually omit or over-simplify the lifestyle dimension, the proposed approach gives a more coherent framework for the formulation of alternative demand levels. These demands for energy services enrich the scenario-building process and influence not only the economic system, but also the energy system. The digital society involves significant growth of both GDP and the unemployment rate, and does not result in carbon neutrality, whereas the collective society leads to smaller growth of GDP and a decrease in the unemployment rate, but makes it possible to reach a nil carbon target. These results underline the leverage role of lifestyles in attaining carbon neutrality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Assoumou E (2006) Modélisation MARKAL pour la planification énergétique long terme dans le contexte français. École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris
Bairstow J (2017) Sweden says it will go ‘carbon neutral by 2045.’ In: Energy live news—energy made easy. http://www.energylivenews.com/2017/06/20/sweden-says-it-will-go-carbon-neutral-by-2045/. Accessed 17 Aug 2017
Blok K (2004) Lifestyles and energy. In: Cleveland CJ (ed) Encyclopedia of energy. Elsevier, New York, pp 655–662
Briens F (2015) La Décroissance au prisme de la modélisation prospective: Exploration macroéconomique d’une alternative paradigmatique. Phdthesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris
Brundtland G, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B, Fadika L, Hauff V, Lang I, Shijun M, Morino de Botero M, Singh M, Okita S et al (1987) Our common future (‘Brundtland report’)
Dillman DA, Rosa EA, Dillman JJ (1983) Lifestyle and home energy conservation in the United States: the poor accept lifestyle cutbacks while the wealthy invest in conservation. J Econ Psychol 3:299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(83)90008-9
Druckman A, Jackson T (2010) The bare necessities: how much household carbon do we really need? Ecol Econ 69:1794–1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.018
Goodall C (2010) How to live a low-carbon life: the individual’s guide to stopping climate change, 2nd edn. fully updated. Earthscan, London
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland
Le Gallic T, Assoumou E, Maïzi N (2017) Future demand for energy services through a quantitative approach of lifestyles. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.065
Leonard-Barton D (1981) voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. J Consum Res 8:243. https://doi.org/10.1086/208861
Maréchal P (1977) Crise de l’énergie et évolution des modes de vie, CREDOC
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind, 2nd edn. Universe Books, New York
Ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire (2017) Plan Climat, France. Available at https://www.ecologique-solidaire.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2017.07.06%20-%20Plan%20Climat.pdf Accessed 25 August 2017
Mont O, Neuvonen A, Lähteenoja S (2014) Sustainable lifestyles 2050: stakeholder visions, emerging practices and future research. J Clean Prod 63:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.007
Neslen A (2016) Norway pledges to become climate neutral by 2030. The Guardian. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/15/norway-pledges-to-become-climate-neutral-by-2030 Accessed 17 Aug 2017
Neuvonen A, Kaskinen T, Leppänen J, Lähteenoja S, Mokka R, Ritola M (2014) Low-carbon futures and sustainable lifestyles: a backcasting scenario approach. Futures 58:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.01.004
Schipper L, Bartlett S, Hawk D, Vine E (1989) Linking life-styles and energy use: a matter of time? Annu Rev Energy 14:273–320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.14.110189.001421
Tukker A (ed) (2008) Perspectives on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production. Greenleaf, Sheffield
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Millot, A., Doudard, R., Le Gallic, T., Briens, F., Assoumou, E., Maïzi, N. (2018). France 2072: Lifestyles at the Core of Carbon Neutrality Challenges. In: Giannakidis, G., Karlsson, K., Labriet, M., Gallachóir, B. (eds) Limiting Global Warming to Well Below 2 °C: Energy System Modelling and Policy Development. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 64. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74423-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74424-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)