Abstract
I introduced the “principle of inductive evidence” PIE in my paper “Creative subject and bar theorem” (Martino 1982). Because of a misunderstanding in my correspondence with the editors, the published version of the above paper is not the final revised draft, but a first outline of the article which needs some corrections and explications. I shall refer to the published version as CS. In CS, I asserted somewhat rashly the absolute equivalence of PIE and the monotonic bar theorem \(BI_{M}\) by means of all too sketchy proof in the course of which I introduced in passing a rather problematic assumption without explaining it properly. Therefore, I shall present here a more adequate treatment of the connection between PIE and \(BI_{M}\). In fact, I shall assume acquaintance with Sects. 4.1 and Theorem 4.1 of CS and provide a revised version of Theorem 4.2.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Martino, E. (1982). Creative subject and bar theorem. In D. V. Dalen & A. Troelstra (Eds.), The L. E. J. Brouwer Centenary Symposium (pp. 311–318). North Holland: Amsterdam. Reprinted here as chapter 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martino, E. (2018). Connection Between the Principle of Inductive Evidence and the Bar Theorem. In: Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74357-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74357-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74356-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74357-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)