Unusual Power: Leading with Gentleness

  • Mihai C. Bocarnea
  • Joshua Henson
  • Russell L. Huizing
  • Michael Mahan
  • Bruce E. Winston
Chapter
Part of the Christian Faith Perspectives in Leadership and Business book series (CFPLB)

Abstract

While gentleness is not typically on a list of leadership characteristics, we can see from the triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday that the concept of a gentle leader has both Old and New Testament roots. This chapter will analyze this type of gentle leadership that is able to flourish in the midst of resistance and injustice while finding leniency in the midst of judgment. The contemporary model of social power base theory provides a framework for applying these ancient insights to contemporary leaders. It is out of this comparison that not only a more fascinating understanding of biblical gentleness is seen but also how gentleness becomes exemplified by the cultural desire to see gentleness that offsets stern laws.

References

  1. Bauder (1971). New Testament Theology (Ed. C. Brown, L. Conen, E. Beyreuther, & H. Bietenhard). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.Google Scholar
  2. Colaresi (2004). When Doves Cry: International Rivalry, Unreciprocated Cooperation, and Leadership Turnover. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3). 555–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Derksen (2010). Why Did Early Christians Turn Violent? The Case of Early Egyptian. Theological Review, 31(1). 60–91.Google Scholar
  4. deSilva (2004). Introduction to the New Testament: Contexts, Methods & Ministry Formation. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
  5. deVellis (2017). Scale Development Theory and Applications (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Dickey (2014). The Complete Koine-English Reference Bible: New Testament, Septuagint and Strong’s Concordance. Kindle Edition: Amazon Digital Services, LLC.Google Scholar
  7. Doob (2000). Transforming the Punishment Environment: Understanding Public Views of What Should be Accomplished at Sentencing. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(3). 323–340.Google Scholar
  8. Ellens (2014). That Tough Guy from Nazareth: A Psychological Assessment of Jesus. Hervormde Teologiese Studies, 70(1). 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Exline & Geyer (2004). Perceptions of Humility: A Preliminary Study. Self and Identity, 3(2). 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. French & Raven (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.) Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. 150–167.Google Scholar
  11. Gorringe (2007). Three Texts about Moses: Numbers 12, 16 and 20. Expository Times, 118(4). 177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guenter (2016). ‘Blessed is He Who Comes’: Psalm 118 and Jesus’s Triumphal Entry. Bibliotheca sacra, 173(692). 425–447.Google Scholar
  13. Hauk & Schulz (1968). “Gentleness.” In G. Kittel (Ed.) Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Trans. G. W. Bromiley). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  14. Kessler, Bandelli, Spector, Borman, Nelson, & Penney (2010). Re-Examining Machiavelli: A Three-Dimensional Model of Machiavellianism in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(8). 1868–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kinman (1999). Parousia, Jesus’ ‘A-Triumphal’ Entry, and the Fate of Jerusalem (Luke 19:28–44). Journal of Biblical Literature, 118(2). 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klocke (2009). ‘I Am the Best’: Effects of Influence Tactics and Power Bases on Powerholders’ Self-Evaluation and Target Evaluation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(5). 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koslowsky, Schwarzwald, & Ashuri (2001). On the Relationship Between Subordinates’ Compliance to Power Sources and Organisational Attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3). 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krohn (2012). Intrapsychic Impediments to Effective Leadership. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32(4). 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Louw & Nida (1988). Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains. New York: United Bible Societies.Google Scholar
  20. Luthar (1996). Gender Differences in Evaluation of Performance and Leadership Ability: Autocratic vs. Democratic Managers. Sex Roles, 35(5/6). 337–361.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer (1986). Matthew 21:1–11. Interpretation, 40(2). 180–185.Google Scholar
  22. Northouse (2015). Leadership: Theory and Practice (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Pierro, Raven, Amato, & Bélanger (2013). Bases of Social Power, Leadership Styles, and Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6). 1122–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raven (1993). The Bases of Power: Origins and Recent Developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4). 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raven (2008). The Bases of Power and the Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1). 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers (1986). Moses: Meek or Miserable? Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 29(3). 257–263.Google Scholar
  27. Schwarzwald, Koslowsky, & Agassi (2001). Captain’s Leadership Type and Police Officers’ Compliance to Power Bases. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3). 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suttner (2014). Nelson Mandela’s Masculinities. African Identities, 12(3–4). 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihai C. Bocarnea
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joshua Henson
    • 3
  • Russell L. Huizing
    • 4
  • Michael Mahan
    • 2
  • Bruce E. Winston
    • 2
  1. 1.Regent UniversityVirginia BeachUSA
  2. 2.Regent UniversityChesapeakeUSA
  3. 3.Regent UniversityOcalaUSA
  4. 4.Toccoa Falls CollegeClarkesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations