Abstract
Building on a systematic review of the literature, we define and discuss why and how purchasing needs to be involved in the discontinuous innovation process. We argue that purchasing involvement in NPD should be considered mainly when the customer firm faces discontinuous innovation. Seeking to promote this emerging research agenda, we present three propositions to focus future studies and inspire practices: (a) technology sourcing and scanning out of the boundary of the supply base is an important stake to support discontinuous innovation as (b) to form an ambidextrous purchasing organization and (c) to develop absorptive capacity within purchasing function. The paper concludes by summarizing the conceptual implications of the paper, outlining some initial managerial recommendations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Athaide GA, Zhang JQ (2011) The determinants of seller-buyer interactions during new product development in technology-based industrial markets. J Prod Innov Manag 28(1):146–158
Bergek A, Berggren C, Magnusson T, Hobday M (2013) Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Res Policy 42(6):1210–1224
Bessant JR, Lamming RC, Noke H, Phillips WE (2005) Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation 25(12):1366–1376
Bidault F, Castello A (2010) Why too much trust is death to innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(4):33–39
Bonaccorsi A, Lipparini A (1994) Strategic partnerships in new product development: an Italian case study. J Prod Innov Manag 11:134–145
Brem A, Tidd J (2012) Perspectives on supplier innovation. Imperial College Press, London
Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M (2007) Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80(4):571–583
Buffington J, Amini M, Keskinturk T (2012) Development of a product design and supply-chain fulfillment system for discontinuous innovation. Int J Prod Res 50(14):3776–3785
Bunduchi R (2013) Trust, partner selection and innovation outcome in collaborative new product development. Prod Plan Control 24(2–3):145–157
Burt DN, Soukup WR (1985) Purchasing’s role in new product development. Harv Bus Rev 63(3):90–97
Calvi R (2000) Le role des services achats dans le developpement des produits nouveaux: une approche organisationnelle [The role of purchasing in new product development: an organisational approach]. Finance Contrôle Stratégie 3(2):31–55
Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Chiang IR, Wu SJ (2016) Supplier involvement and contract design during new product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 63(2):248–258
Christensen C, Rosenbloom RS (1995) The attacker’s advantage: technological paradigms, organizational dynamics and the value network. Res Policy 24:233–257
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152
Cousins P, Handfield R, Lawson B, Petersen K (2006) Creating supply chain relational capital: the impact of formal and informal socialization processes. J Oper Manag 24(6):851–863
Cousins PD, Lawson B, Petersen KJ, Handfield RB (2011) Breakthrough scanning, supplier knowledge exchange, and new product development performance. J Prod Innov Manag 28(6):930–942
Crozier M, Friedberg F (1977) L’Acteur et le Système. Les Contraintes de l’action Collective. Éditions du Seuil, Paris
Datta A, Jessup LM (2013) Looking beyond the focal industry and existing technologies for radical innovations. Technovation 33(10/11):355–367
Dell’Era C, Marchesi A, Verganti R (2010) Mastering technologies in design-driven innovation. Res Technol Manag 53(2):12–23
Farmer D (1981) The role of procurement in new product development. Int J Phys Distrib Mater Manag 11(2/3):46–54
Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J 47(2):209–226
Gilbert CG (2006) Change in the presence of residual fit: can competing frames coexist? Organ Sci 17(1):150–167
Godfrey PC, Hill CWL (1995) The problem of unobservable in strategic management research. Strateg Manag J 16:519–533
Golicic SL, Sebastiao HJ (2011) Supply chain strategy in nascent markets: the role of supply chain development in the commercialization process. J Bus Logist 32(3):254–273
Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380
Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across subunits. Adm Sci Q 44(1):82–111
Harvey C, Kelly A, Morris H, Rowlinson M (2010) Academic journal quality guide version, 4. The Association of Business Schools, London
Johnsen TE (2009) Supplier involvement in product development and innovation – taking stock and looking to the future. J Purch Supply Manag 15(3):187–197
Knudsen MP (2007) The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success. J Prod Innov Manag 24(2):117–138
Lakemond N, van Echtelt F, Wynstra F (2001) A configuration typology for involving purchasing specialists in product development. J Supply Chain Manag 37(4):11–27
Lambe CJ, Spekman RE (1997) Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. J Prod Innov Manag 14(2):102–116
Linton JD (2002) Forecasting the market diffusion of disruptive and discontinuous innovation. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(4):365–374
Magnusson T, Lindström G, Berggren C (2003) Architectural or modular innovation? Managing discontinuous product development in response to challenging environmental performance targets. Int J Innov Manag 7(1):1–26
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
McDermott C, Handfield R (2000) Concurrent development and strategic outsourcing: do the rules change in breakthrough innovation? J High Technol Manag Res 11(1):35–57
Nicholas J, Ledwith A, Bessant J (2013) Reframing the search space for radical innovation. Res Technol Manag 56:27–35
O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harv Bus Rev 82(4):74–81
Perrons RK, Richards MG, Platts K (2004) The effect of industry clockspeed on make-buy decisions in the face of radical innovations: an empirical test. Int J Innov Manag 8(04):431–454
Petersen KJ, Handfield RB, Ragatz GL (2005) Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. J Oper Manag 23(3–4):371–388
Phillips WE, Lamming RC, Bessant JR, Noke H (2006a) Discontinuous innovation and supply relationships: strategic dalliances. R&D Manag 36(4):451–461
Phillips WE, Noke H, Bessant J, Lamming R (2006b) Beyond the steady state: managing discontinuous product and process innovation. Int J Innov Manag 10(2):1–23
Primo MAM, Amundson SD (2002) An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes. J Oper Manag 20(1):33–52
Reid SE, De Brentani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J Prod Innov Manag 21(3):170–184
Rice MP, Leifer R, O’Connor G (2000) Managing the transition of a discontinuous innovation project to operational status. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 15:586–590
Rice MP, Leifer R, O’Connor G (2002) Commercializing discontinuous innovations: bridging the gap from discontinuous innovation project to operations. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(4):330–340
Rice MP, O’Connor GC, Peters LS, Morone JG (1998) Managing discontinuous innovation. Res Technol Manag 41(3):52
Ritala P, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P (2013) Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition—the role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. J Prod Innov Manag 30(1):154–169
Rohrbeck R (2010) Harnessing a network of experts for competitive advantage: technology scouting in the ICT industry. R&D Manag 40(2):169–180
Rothaermel FT, Alexandre MT (2009) Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organ Sci 20(4):759–780
Schiele H (2010) Early supplier integration: the dual role of purchasing in new product development. R&D Manag 40(2):138–153
Schiele H, Calvi R, Gibbert M (2012) Customer attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status: introduction, definitions and an overarching framework. Ind Mark Manag 41(8):1178–1185
Servajean R, Calvi R (2018) Shades of the innovation-purchasing function – the missing link of open innovation. Int J Innov Mgt 22(1):1850008
Song M, Di Benedetto A (2008) Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. J Oper Manag 26(1):1–22
Song M, Parry ME (1999) Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan. J Oper Manag 17:665–688
Swink ML (1999) Threats to new product manufacturability and the effects of development team integration processes. J Oper Manag 17:691–709
Takeishi A (2001) Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strateg Manag J 22(5):403–433
Theoharakis V, Wong V (2002) Marking high-technology market evolution through the foci of market stories: the case of local area networks. J Prod Innov Manag 19(6):400–411
Tomaselli FC, Di Serio LC (2013) Supply networks and value creation in high innovation and strong network externalities industry. J Technol Manag Innov 8(4):177–185
Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222
Tsai KH (2009) Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective. Res Policy 38(5):765–778
Tu Q, Vonderembse MA, Ragu-Nathan TS, Sharkey TW (2006) Absorptive capacity: enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices. J Oper Manag 24(5):692–710
Van de Vrande V, Vanhaverbeke W, Duysters G (2011) Technology in-sourcing and the creation of pioneering technologies. J Prod Innov Manag 28(6):974–987
Van Echtelt FEA, Wynstra F, van Weele AJ, Duyesters G (2008) Managing supplier involvement in npd: a multiple-case study. J Prod Innov Manag 25(2):180–201
Villena VH, Revilla E, Choi TY (2011) The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: a social capital perspective. J Oper Manag 29(6):561–576
Wynstra JYF, Axelsson B, van Weele A (2000) Driving and enabling factors for purchasing involvement in product development. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 6(2):129–141
Xu S, Wu F, Cavusgil E (2013) Complements or substitutes? Internal technological strength, competitor alliance participation, and innovation development. J Prod Innov Manag 30(4):750–762
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Calvi, R., Johnsen, T., Picaud Bello, K. (2018). Purchasing Involvement in Discontinuous Innovation: An Emerging Research Agenda. In: Moreira, A., Ferreira, L., Zimmermann, R. (eds) Innovation and Supply Chain Management. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74304-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74304-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74303-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74304-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)