Resilience Through Collaborative Networks in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Chinese Venture Capital

  • Yuhong Zhou
  • Peter A. Gloor
  • Stephanie L. Woerner
Chapter
Part of the Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics book series (ESID)

Abstract

The high-speed growth of emerging economies attracts the attention of global investors, but the uncertain institutional environment in emerging and transitional economies makes investors uneasy. Using China’s venture capital (VC) data, this article examines the performance consequences of differences in ownership between foreign and local investors, and network position established when VC firms (VCs) syndicate portfolio company investments. There is a phenomenon of separate institutional settings between China’s local VCs and foreign VCs in China, which makes ownership significantly affect investment performance. The VCs’ positions in the collaborative networks can play a mediating role; foreign VCs have better investment performance because of their more central-network position. Better-networked VCs can supplement or replace formal institutions in transitional economies.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers and Pamela Siska at MIT WCC. We thank the Chinese Government Scholarship (CSC NO. 201606155079), the Humanities and Social Science Fund of Education Ministry of China (NO. 13YJC630248) and the Central Universities Fundamental Research Grant in China (NO. 2015ZDXM01).

References

  1. Abell, P., & Nisar, T. (2007). Performance effects of venture capital networks. Management Dicision, 45(5), 923–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2006). Venture capital in emerging economies: Networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30(2), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anne, L., et al. (2016). The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures’ success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 393–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aydin, N., Sayim, M., & Yalama, A. (2007). Foreign ownership and firm performance: Evidence from Turkey. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 11, 103–111.Google Scholar
  5. Barnard, H. (2010). Overcoming the liability of foreignness without strong firm capabilities: The value of market-based resources. Journal of International Management, 16(2), 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Puky, T. (2009). Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 762–7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bygrave, W. D. (1988). The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney, M. (1998). The competitiveness of networked production: The role of trust and asset specificity. Journal of Management Studies, 35(4), 457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho, A. G., Calomiris, C. W., & Matos, J. A. (2008). Venture capital as human resource management. Journal of Economics and Business, 60(3), 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewen, M. (2010). Venture capital returns, new firms and social networks. San Diego: University of California.Google Scholar
  11. Feng, Z. (2012). The top 10 characteristics of China’s venture capital industry in 2011. Science and Technology Entrepreneurship, 1, 17–19.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuller, D. B. (2010). How law, politics and transnational networks affect technology entrepreneurship: Explaining divergent venture capital investing strategies in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geleilate, J.-M. G., et al. (2016). Home country institutional effects on the multinationality–performance relationship: A comparison between emerging and developed market multinationals. Journal of International Management, 22, 380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gloor, P. A. (2006). Swarm creativity: Competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hain, D., Johan, S., & Wang, D. (2016). Determinants of cross-border venture capital investments in emerging and developed economies: The effects of relational and institutional trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 743–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 251–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2010). Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 65(3), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hochberg, Y. V., Lindsey, L. A., & Westerfield, M. M. (2015). Resource accumulation through economics ties: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 118, 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopp, C. (2010). The evolution of inter-organizational networks in venture capital financing. Applied Financial Economics, 20(22), 1725–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keil, T., Maula, M. V., & Wilson, C. (2010). Unique resources of corporate venture capitalists as a key to entry into rigid venture capital syndication networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Large, D., & Muegge, S. (2008). Venture capitalists’ non-financial value-added: An evaluation of the evidence and implications for research. Venture Capital, 10(1), 20–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu, H., Tan, Y., & Huang, H. (2012). Why do venture capital firms exist: An institution based rent-seeking perspective and Chinese evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  25. Meuleman, M., et al. (2017). Venturing into the unknown with strangers: Substitutes of relational embeddedness in cross-border partner selection in venture capital syndicates. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2017), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nahata, R. (2008). Venture capital reputation and investment performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 90, 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prijcker, S. D., et al. (2012). The influence of experiential, inherited and external knowledge on the internationalization of venture capital firms. International Business Review, 21, 929–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2008). Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 266–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang, J., & Pezeshkan, A. (2016). Host country network, industry experience, and international alliance formation: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou, Y., & Song, G. (2014). The dynamic evolution of venture capital network in China. Systems Engineering – Theory & Practice, 14(11), 2748–2759.Google Scholar
  31. Zhu, Q. (2015). Research on the tax system of private equity fund of limited partnership. East China University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuhong Zhou
    • 1
  • Peter A. Gloor
    • 2
  • Stephanie L. Woerner
    • 2
  1. 1.South China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations