Advertisement

From Local Utility to Global Commodity

  • Tom Evens
  • Karen Donders
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business book series (GMPB)

Abstract

This chapter provides an historical overview of television distribution and its shift from a local utility to a global commodity. It describes the role of cable in the early days, which extended the reach of over-the-air television and was considered to serve the public interest. It shows how cable developed into pay-television systems that directly competed with free-to-air channels. It depicts how the cable industry became gradually privatised and liberalised, with local monopolies merging into national operators and being sold to private investors. It exemplifies how distribution has lost its local character and turned into a business that is increasingly reigned by international corporations active in large parts of the world. Geographical expansion has further driven industry consolidation, resulting in the formation of a handful pan-European distribution groups. Liberty Global is presented as a case of a global cable conglomerate expanding into activities along the audiovisual value chain.

References

  1. Ala-Fossi, M., & Lax, S. (2016). The short future of public broadcasting: Replacing digital terrestrial television with internet protocol. International Communication Gazette, 78(4), 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arsenault, A. H. (2011). The structure and dynamics of communications business networks in an era of convergence. Mapping the global network of the information business. In D. Winseck & D. Y. Jin (Eds.), The political economies of media. The transformation of the global media industries (pp. 101–120). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  3. Aufderheide, P. (1992). Cable television and the public interest. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aufderheide, P. (2006). The 1996 Telecommunications Act: Ten years later. Federal Communications Law Journal, 58(3), Article 3.Google Scholar
  5. Barraclough, L. (2017, January 16). Liberty media plots formula one’s route to revenue growth. Available at: http://variety.com/2017/biz/global/liberty-media-formula-one-revenue-growth-1201961123/.
  6. Barron, J. (1994, January 25). Irving B. Kahn, 76, a founder of teleprompter and cable TV. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  7. Burgelman, J.-C., Punie, Y., & Verhoest, P. (1995). Van telegraaf tot Telenet. Naar een nieuw communicatiebestel in België en Vlaanderen? Brussels: VUB Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cao, R. (2017, February 17). Liberty Global shares skyrocket after subscriber growth. Available at: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/liberty-global-shares-skyrocket-after-subscriber-growth.html.
  9. Cook, C., Novak, V., & Frisch, S. (2016). Recent developments in EU merger remedies. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 7(5), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Marez, L., Evens, T., Schuurman, D., Berte, K., & Dejonghe, E. (2008). Assessing the added value of alternative distribution methods for digital TV in a cable-dominant region. In A. Urbán, B. Sapio, & T. Turk (Eds.), Digital television revisited: Linking users, markets and policies (pp. 15–22). Budapest, Hungary: COST Action 298 “Participation in the Broadband Society”.Google Scholar
  11. Digital TV Europe. (2014, September 19). Liberty Global sets focus on OTT, free broadcasting and sports. Available at: http://www.digitaltveurope.net/244832/liberty-global-sets-focus-on-ott-free-broadcasting-and-sports/.
  12. Donders, K., Loisen, J., & Pauwels, C. (2013). Private television in Europe—A new beginning or the beginning of the end? Private television in Western Europe: Content, markets, policies (pp. 11–19). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Dziadul, C. (2016, December 22). Telenet to buy SFR BeLux. Available at: http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2016/12/22/telenet-buy-sfr-belux/.
  14. Edgerton, G. R. (2008). A brief history of HBO. In G. R. Edgerton & J. P. Jones (Eds.), The essential HBO reader (pp. 1–20). Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  15. Eisenmann, T. R. (2000, July 10). Cable TV: From community antennas to wired cities. Harvard Business School Weekly Newsletter.Google Scholar
  16. Esser, A. (2002). The transnationalization of European television. Journal of European Area Studies, 10(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2013). Case No COMP/M.6880—Liberty Global/Virgin Media. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m6880_410_2.pdf.
  18. European Commission. (2014a, September 16). Case No COMP/M.7282—Liberty Global-Discovery-All3media. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7282_20140916_20310_3883915_EN.pdf.
  19. European Commission. (2014b). M.7000—Liberty Global/Ziggo. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7000_20141010_20600_4221982_EN.pdf.
  20. Evens, T., & Donders, K. (2013). Broadcast market structures and retransmission payments: A European perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 35(4), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evens, T., & Donders, K. (2016). Mergers and acquisitions in TV broadcasting and distribution: Challenges for competition, industrial and media policy. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 674–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evens, T., Iosifidis, P., & Smith, P. (2013). The Political Economy of Television Sports Rights. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  23. Evens, T., Van Rompuy, B., & Donders, K. (2014, September 9). Merger mania in distribution and content markets: Need for European action. Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2014/09/09/merger-mania-in-distribution-and-content-markets-need-for-european-action/.
  24. Evens, T., Verdegem, P., & De Marez, L. (2010). Balancing public and private value for the digital television era. Javnost-The Public, 17(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fontaine, G., & Deirdre, K. (2016). Media ownership: Towards pan-European groups? Strasbourg: European Audiuovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  26. Gershon, R. A. (1990). Pay cable television: A regulatory history. Communications and the Law, 12(2), 3–26.Google Scholar
  27. Given, J. (2015). Did it work? Evaluating the cost and benefits of the transition to digital TV in Australia. International Journal of Digital Television, 6(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gurses, K., & Ozcan, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship in regulated markets: Framing contests and collective action to introduce pay TV in the US. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1709–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The cultural industries (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Heuman, J. (2011). “I don’t want to pay for what i don’t watch”: The cultural politics of à la Carte cable television and the cultural life of communication policy. Communication, Culture and Critique, 4(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horten, M. (2016). UK telecoms review—Is openreach too hot to touch? Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2016/02/25/uk-telecoms-review-is-openreach-too-hot-to-touch/ (February 28, 2017).
  32. IHS. (2015). Current market trends and technology trends in the broadcasting sector. Paper presented at the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, WIPO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, V. E. (2009). Historicizing TV networking: Broadcasting, cable and the case of ESPN. In J. Holt & A. Perren (Eds.), Media industries. History, theory, and method (pp. 57–68). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Lillie, J. (2005). Cultural access, participation, and citizenship in the emerging consumer-network society. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 11(2), 41–48.Google Scholar
  35. Lotz, A. D. (2017). Portals: A treatise on internet-distributed television. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McChesney, R. W. (2001). Global media, neoliberalism and imperialism. Monthly Review 52(10), 1–9, New York.Google Scholar
  38. McGrail, M., & Roberts, B. (2005). Strategies in the broadband cable TV industry: The challenges for management and technology innovation. Info: The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 7(1), 53–65.Google Scholar
  39. Müller, J. (1987). Cable policy in Europe: The role of transborder broadcasting and its effects on CATV. Telecommunications Policy, 11(3), 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Otten, R. (2005). Achter Televisie: Omroepmarkten en -structuren in West-Europa. Antwerpen: Garant.Google Scholar
  41. Parsons, P. (2008). Blue skies: A history of cable television. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Puppis, M. (2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quico, C. (2012). Digital TV switchover in Portugal: What’s in it for the viewer? International Journal of Digital Television, 3(2), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slaa, P., & Burgelman, J.-C. (Eds.). (1994). Verglaasde steden: de communicatiesnelweg tot in huis?. Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever.Google Scholar
  45. Slattery, L. (2015, July 4). TV3 deal is another content play for Liberty Global. Available at: http://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/tv3-deal-is-another-content-play-for-liberty-global-1.2273050.
  46. Smith, P. (2006). The politics of UK television policy: The making of ofcom. Media, Culture & Society, 28(6), 929–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, P., Evens, T., & Iosifidis, P. (2016). The next big match: Convergence, competition and sports media rights. European Journal of Communication, 31(5), 536–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, R. L. (1972). The wired nation: Cable TV, the electronic communications highway. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  49. Starks, M. (2013). The digital television revolution. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Streeter, T. (1997). Blue skies and strange bedfellows: The discourse of cable television. In L. Spigel & M. Curtin (Eds.), The revolution wasn’t televised: Sixties television and social conflict (pp. 221–242). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Svendsen, E. N. (2010). Keeping the balance: Digital television in Denmark. International Journal of Digital Television, 1(2), 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Telenet (2016). Telenet annual report 2016. Available at: http://nl.investors.telenet.be/phoenix.zhtml?c=241898&p=irol-irhome.
  53. Thomas, D. (2016, May 11). EU commission blocks Three-O2 telecoms merger. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/32018c52-1695-11e6-9d98-00386a18e39d.
  54. van Cuilenburg, J. J., & McQuail, D. (2003). Media policy paradigm shifts: Towards a new communications policy paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verhoest, P., Vercruysse, J.-P., & Punie, Y. (1991). Telecomumnicatie en Beleid in België: 1830–1991. Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinkel Uitgever.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, C. (2016, December 3). Liberty tunes out of ITV takeover bid. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/12/03/liberty-tunes-itv-takeover-bid/.
  57. Winseck, D. (2011). The political economies of media and the transformation of the global media industries. In D. Winseck & D. Y. Jin (Eds.), The political economies of media. The transformation of the global media industries (pp. 3–48). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.imec-mict, Department of Communication SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.imec-SMIT, Department of Communication SciencesFree University of BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations