Advertisement

Transport Infrastructure of the Future: Technology Leadership in the Industry 4.0 Concept

  • Viktor Blaginin
  • Petr Mihaylovskiy
  • Svetlana Pyankova
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The transport infrastructure has long been considered as a link in the socioeconomic process of the territory formation and development. In spite of the fact that the transport infrastructure does not create the product itself, it participates in every system-forming process. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to consider “new opportunities” for the development of transport in Russia and in the world as a whole. The study is based on the document developed in Germany on Industry 4.0 and the emerging Industry 5.0. In our paper, we make an attempt with the purpose to forecast and model the level of development of the transport industry of the future for short- and medium-term periods. The paper is therefore focused on the leadership aspect of technology related to the transport economics. Our results might be of special interest for researchers as well as for state planners, stakeholders, and politicians responsible for the transport and transport infrastructure.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The reported study was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), research project No. 18-010-00833 “Neoindustrialization in the space of the macroregion in the context of a cyclic wave methodology (in terms of Ural)”.

References

  1. Animitsa YG, Sukhikh VA (2007) Prostranstvenno-vremennaya paradigm v socioekonomike: regionalnyj aspect [Space and time paradigm in the social economy: regional aspect], 1st edn. PGNIU Publishing House, Perm, 140 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Asaul AN, Malygin IG, Komashinskiy VI (2016) Chetvertaya industrialnaya revolutsia (Industrie 4.0) v transportnoy i soputstvuyuschikh otraslyakh [Fourth industrial revolution (Industrie 4.0) in transport and related spheres]. Problemy upravlenya riskami v tekhnosfere 2(38):70–78Google Scholar
  3. Batista NC, Melício R, Mendes VM (2017) Services enabler architecture for smart grid and smart living services providers under industry 4.0. Energ Buildings 141:16–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaginin V, Karkh D, Kolotnina E (2017) Factors forming transport-communication infrastructure of the region: Russian theory and practice. J Environ Manag Tour 8(3):657–665.  https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v8.3(19).17 Google Scholar
  5. Brodzicki T (2016) Does variety matter? Export pattern of Poland prior and after the accession to the EU. Int Econ Lett 4(2):103–118.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2016.4.2.5 Google Scholar
  6. Cieślik A, Michałek J, Mycielski J (2016) Globalization, international trade, and human development: a case of Central and Eastern Europe. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 5(2):6–15.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2016.5.2.1 Google Scholar
  7. Dobyndo MA (2008) Analiz razvitiya transportno-kommunikatsionnoy infrastruktury kak forma uglublenya mezhregionalnoy ekonomitcheskoy integratsii v federalnom okruge [Analysis of the development of the transport and communication infrastructure as a form of deepening of inter-regional economic integration in federal district]. Ekonomitcheskiy analiz: teorya i praktika 21(126):44–54Google Scholar
  8. Gurbanov R, Bilan Y, Strielkowski W (2015) Economic advantages and disadvantages of Turkish EU accession. Montenegrin J Econ 11(2):7–30.  https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845.2015/11-2/1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ignatyev VA (2003) Gosudarstvennoye i munitsipalnoe upravlenie I regulirovanie v transportnoy sisteme [State and municipal management and regulation in transport system], 1st edn. BGUEP Publishing, Irkutsk, 418 pGoogle Scholar
  10. Industrie 4.0 (2015) Controlling in the age of intelligent networks. Dream Car of the Dream Factory of the ICV. https://www.icv-controlling.com/fileadmin/Assets/Content/AK/Ideenwerkstatt/Files/Dream_Car_Industrie_4.0_EN.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
  11. Lisin E, Lebedev I, Sukhareva E, Komarov I (2014) Analysis of scenario of structural and technological modernization of the power industry in the context of competitive electricity markets. Int Econ Lett 3(3):105–114.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.3.3 Google Scholar
  12. Machnacek V, Strielkowski W, Shishkin A, Bilan Y (2015) Determinants of innovations and competitiveness in the European Union. Mark Manag Innov 4:224–232Google Scholar
  13. Morselli A (2015) The decision-making process between convention and cognition. Econ Soc 8(1):205–221.  https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-1/16 Google Scholar
  14. Niño-Amézquita J, Dubrovsky V, Jankurová A (2017) Innovations and competitiveness in regional development: a comparison of Latin America, Europe, and China. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 6(1):28–36.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2017.6.1.4 Google Scholar
  15. Pecherskaya OA (2015) Napravlenyja razvitya trasnportno-logisticheskoy struktury Voronezhskoy oblasti [Directions of development of transport and logistics structure of Voronezh region]. FES: Finansy, Ekonomika, Strategya 12:29–33Google Scholar
  16. Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2014) Wie smarte Produkte den Wettbewerb verändern. Harv Bus Manag 1:34–61Google Scholar
  17. Seiter MG, Sejdic M (2015) RuschWelchen Einfluss hat Industrie 4.0 auf die Controlling Prozesse? In: Controlling – Zeitschrift für erfolgsorientierte Unternehmensteuerung, 27 pGoogle Scholar
  18. Silin YP, Animitsa YG, Novikova NV (2016) New normal in Russian economy: regional specificity. Econ Reg 3:714–725Google Scholar
  19. Simionescu M, Ciuiu D, Bilan Y, Strielkowski W (2016) GDP and net migration in some eastern and south-eastern countries of Europe. A panel data and Bayesian approach. Montenegrin J Econ 12(2):161–175.  https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845.2016/12-1/10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Streimikiene D, Strielkowski W, Bilan Y, Mikalauskas I (2016) Energy dependency and sustainable regional development in the Baltic States – a review. Geograph Pannonica 20(2):79–87.  https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1602079S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tvaronaviciene M, Razminiene K, Piccinetti L (2015) Approaches towards cluster analysis. Econ Soc 8(1):19–27.  https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-1/2 Google Scholar
  22. Varanavicius V, Navikaite A, Bilan Y, Strielkowski W (2017) Analysis of consumer behaviour in regional energy consumption. Ekonomika Regiona-Econ Reg 13(1):147–156.  https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-14 Google Scholar
  23. Zielińska A (2016) Information is a market products and information markets. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 5(4):31–38.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2016.5.4.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zlyvko O, Lisin E, Rogalev N, Kurdiukova G (2014) Analysis of the concept of industrial technology platform development in Russia and in the EU. Int Econ Lett 3(4):124–138.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.4.2 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viktor Blaginin
    • 1
  • Petr Mihaylovskiy
    • 1
  • Svetlana Pyankova
    • 1
  1. 1.Ural State University of EconomicsYekaterinburgRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations