Advertisement

Energy Development of the South Caucasus Countries and the Benefits of Eurasian Economic Union

  • Igor Matveev
  • Evgeny Lisin
  • Wadim Strielkowski
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This paper assesses the current state and prospects of the leadership and development of the energy sector of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Armenia, and the Republic of Georgia in the context of historical experience, factors that influence the international specialization of these states, integration processes which take place within the framework of the EAEU and CIS, policies of the leading Western countries in the region, and conjugation of the EAEU and SREB. The authors believe that currently there is an objective need for the countries of Transcaucasia (the participants of the EAEU/CIS) to harmonize positions in the frameworks of development and implementation of energy policy in order to counter the modern challenges and threats and to enter the path of sustainable development. Authors’ generalizations, suggestions, and recommendations can be used by the governmental agencies and other institutions and scientific, expert, and business community in the frameworks of the development of analytical and conceptual documents.

References

  1. Anisimova I (2014) Modern approaches to the construction of financial instruments at markets of electric energy. Czech J Soc Sci, Bus Econ 3(1):64–73.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2014.3.1.8 Google Scholar
  2. Balitskiy S, Bilan Y, Strielkowski W, Štreimikienė D (2016) Energy efficiency and natural gas consumption in the context of economic development in the European Union. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:156–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cornillie J, Fankhauser S (2004) The energy intensity of transition countries. Energy Econ 26(3):283–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR (1938) The Resolution of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR from February 3, 1938. Regulations on the State Planning Commission under the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR. https://istmat.info/node/45455. Accessed 23 Oct 2017
  5. Georgia Department of Economic Development (2017) International investment. https://www.georgia.org/business-resources/international- investment/ Accessed 19 Oct 2017
  6. Konova O, Komarov I, Lisin E (2012) The relevance of power generating capacities based on the combined cycle power plants of high power. Czech J Soc Sci, Bus Econ 1(1):101–109.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2012.1.1.11 Google Scholar
  7. Lisin E, Strielkowski W (2014) Modelling new economic approaches for the wholesale energy markets in Russia and the EU. Transform Bus Econ 13(2B):566–580Google Scholar
  8. Lisin E, Lebedev I, Sukhareva E, Komarov I (2014) Analysis of scenario of structural and technological modernization of the power industry in the context of competitive electricity markets. Int Econ Letters 3(3):105–114.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.3.3 Google Scholar
  9. Lisin E, Rogalev A, Strielkowski W, Komarov I (2015) Sustainable modernization of the Russian power utilities industry. Sustainability 7(9):11378–11400.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su70911378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lussac SJ (2010) Ensuring European energy security in Russian ‘near abroad’: the case of the south Caucasus. Eur Secur 19(4):607–625.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2010.526939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marjanyan A (2016) The role and place of nuclear power plants in the social and economic life of Armenia cannot be underestimated. https://arminfo.info/full_news.php?id=23190&lang=2. Accessed 20 Sep 2017
  12. Matveyev IE (2017) The energy track of interfacing of the Eurasian economic union and the silk road economic belt. https://burneft.ru/archive/issues/2017-05/8. Accessed 20 Sep 2017
  13. Mavrakis D, Thomaidis F, Ntroukas I (2006) An assessment of the natural gas supply potential of the south energy corridor from the Caspian region to the EU. Energ Policy 34(13):1671–1680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neftegaz (2016) Armenia can again return to the plan of the development of shale hydrocarbon production. https://neftegaz.ru/news/view/154413-Armeniya-mozhet-snova-vernutsya-k-planam-po-razvitiyu-dobychi-slantsevyh-uglevodorodov. Accessed 22 Oct 2017
  15. Nuriyev E (2008) Azerbaijan and the European Union: new landmarks of strategic partnership in the south Caucasus–Caspian basin. Southeast Eur Black Sea Stud 8(2):155–167.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850802117773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zlyvko O, Lisin E, Rogalev N, Kurdiukova G (2014) Analysis of the concept of industrial technology platform development in Russia and in the EU. Int Econ Letters 3(4):124–138.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.4.2 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Matveev
    • 1
  • Evgeny Lisin
    • 2
  • Wadim Strielkowski
    • 3
  1. 1.Russian Market Research InstituteMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Moscow Power Engineering InstituteMoscowRussian Federation
  3. 3.Prague Institute for Qualification Enhancement & Prague Business SchoolPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations