Advertisement

The Development of Transformational Leadership Competencies in the Future Teachers in a Polycultural Educational Space

  • Irina Igropulo
  • Ruslan Magomedov
  • Natalia Romaeva
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The relevance of the research is conditioned by a higher role of transformational leadership in education in conditions of ever-increasing complexity and pace of social and cultural change. Due to this, the paper is aimed at finding out the set of organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of competencies of transformational leadership in the future teachers in the polycultural educational space. The leading method for studying this problem is the contrastive and comparative analysis of literature that allows viewing the transformational leadership in an integrated way as the subject of interdisciplinary reflection; the systemization and generalization of the data obtained has allowed making more certain the essential features of the future teachers’ transformational leadership competencies. In the paper, the following are the results of a pedagogical experiment of justifying and testing out the organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of the future teachers’ transformational leadership competencies in the polycultural educational space of the North Caucasus: the development of special tasks in formation of the abilities of consistent change management in education, with the complicated ethnic and cultural context borne in mind; the use of educational resource of experiential learning as student-centered and reflexive learning approach for the future teachers; and the use of various ethnic sport forms as a means for practical acquisition of the transformational leadership competencies. The materials of the paper are of practical value for various categories of education workers developing and implementing the programs of priority development of the pedagogical staff as the transformational change leaders, for teachers of pedagogical higher educational institutions when designing the content and technologies of development of leadership competencies in students as the agents of development of educational systems under the complicated and rapidly changing social and cultural conditions.

References

  1. Aksit F, Niemi H, Nevgi A (2016) Why is active learning so difficult to implement: the Turkish case. Aust J Teach Educ 41(4):94–109. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol41/iss4/6. Accessed 25 Aug 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen SJ, Hartman NS (2008) Leader development: an exploration of sources of learning. Organ Dev J 26(2):75–87Google Scholar
  3. Apenko S, Chernobaeva G (2016) The influence of complex adaptive leadership on the efficiency of business management. 4th International Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 14–15 Apr 2016. pp 17–24Google Scholar
  4. Bass BM, Riggio RE (2006) Transformational leadership, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. 282 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyatzis RE (2008) An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective. J Manag Dev 25(7):607–623.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610678445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley R, Caple J (2002) The theory and practice of training. Piter, Saint Petersburg. 352 pGoogle Scholar
  7. Conger JA (1992) Learning to lead: the art of transforming managers into leaders. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. Eliophotou-Menon M, Ioannou A (2016) The link between transformational leadership and teachers’ job satisfaction, commitment, motivation to learn, and trust in the leader. Acad Educ Leadersh J 20(3):12–22Google Scholar
  9. Elkins T, Keller RT (2003) Leadership in research and development organizations: a literature review and conceptual framework. Leadersh Q 14:587–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hannah ST, Campbell DJ, Matthews MD (2010) Advancing a research agenda for leadership in dangerous contexts. Mil Psychol 22(sup1):S157–S189.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08995601003644452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Igropulo IF (2016) Axiological foundations for designing a master’s degree program “Management in education”. World Sci Cult Educ 59(4):113–114Google Scholar
  12. Igropulo IF, Romaeva NB (2016) The structure and functions of the theory of management of innovation processes in education. Humanities 3:23–30Google Scholar
  13. Igropulo IF, Semina IS, Sorokopud YU, Shapovalov VK (2013) The use of tuning methodology for designing master’s degree programmes in teacher education. World Appl Sci J (Educ Law Econ Lang Commun) 27:116–121Google Scholar
  14. Kylasov AV (2009) Ethic and cultural diversity of sports. In: Sport science, encyclopedia of life support systems. Magister-press, Moscow, pp 462–491Google Scholar
  15. Leithwood KA, Sun J (2012) The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: a meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educ Adm Q 48(3):387–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Magomedov RR (2015) Institutionalization of ethnic sports within the professional space. Humanit J Sci Pract 32(4):166–188Google Scholar
  17. Marion R, Uhl-Bien M (2001) Leadership in complex organizations. Leadersh Q 12(4):389–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00092-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niemi H, Nevgi A (2014) Research studies and active learning promoting professional competences in Finnish teacher education. Teach Teach Educ 43:131–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.006. Accessed 13 Aug 2017
  19. Northouse PG (1997) Leadership theory and practice. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  20. Recommendation by the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers on the public responsibility for higher education and research (2007) http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/highereducation/News/pub_res_EN.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2017
  21. Romaeva NB, Rotkina IM (2012) The formation of tolerance to religious denominations in the future teachers within the polycultural environment of pedagogical higher educational institutions. Econ Humanitarian Res Reg 4:68–74Google Scholar
  22. Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG (2011) The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teach Teach Educ 27:37–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.025. Accessed 13 Aug 2017
  23. Uhl-Bien M, Marion R, McKelvey B (2007) Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadersh Q 18(4):298–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watkins D, Earnhardt M, Pittenger L, Roberts R, Rietsema K, Cosman-Ross J (2017) Thriving in complexity: a framework for leadership education. J Leadersh Educ 16(4):148–163.  https://doi.org/10.12806/V16/I4/T4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Webb PT, Neumann M, Jones CL (2004) Politics, school improvement and social justice: a triadic model of teacher leadership. Educ Forum 68(3):254–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yukl G (1999) An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadersh Q 10(2):285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irina Igropulo
    • 1
  • Ruslan Magomedov
    • 2
  • Natalia Romaeva
    • 1
  1. 1.North-Caucasian Federal UniversityStavropolRussian Federation
  2. 2.Stavropol State Pedagogical InstituteStavropolRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations