Regional Flagship Universities as Implementation Leaders in the Priority Development Areas of Russian Educational Paradigm

  • Almira Suleymanova
  • Flyuza Fatkullina
  • Halisa Ismagilova
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to focus the attention of the international academic community on one of the important aspects of development of Russia’s educational paradigm – a network of regional flagship universities being created in the multilevel system of higher professional education. Such universities are designed to efficiently meet the needs of today’s society and to generate a creative scientific, social, and professional climate in their home regions. They are also oriented to upbringing the competent and active specialists having leadership skills and being able to independently identify the goals of their productive activity, to solve various production tasks, to build relations with others correctly, and to work in a team. The authors of the paper note that a need of creating the regional flagship universities is first of all due to the drastic change in all spheres of life of the modern society; to the social and economic, political, and other reforms in Russia; and to fairly important developments of the Russians’ public life content and conscience. In the paper, objectives and tasks faced by the country’s regional flagship universities are viewed, and the contemporary challenges both to higher educational institutions and the entire system of higher professional education of Russia are analyzed. According to the authors, creation of regional flagship universities will allow the higher educational institutions to go on to a brand new quality level. The university will be more than just a place for students to get higher education at; first of all, it will be a leader in implementing the priority directions of development of Russia’s educational paradigm, a center for introducing various social programs and projects, and a basis for forming a new, cutting-edge, harmoniously developed personality having leadership skills. Flagship universities will also be the activation community for the creative and professional thought of all strata of the population in their home regions or macroregions.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The paper has been prepared within scientific project 17-04-00042 supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research.

References

  1. A “soft way” for the Russian higher educational institutions to enter the Bologna process (2005). In: Melvil AY (ed), OLMA-PRESS, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. Asmolov AG (2007) Psychology of personality. A cultural and historical understanding of the development of man. Smysl, Academia, Moscow, 302 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Baidenko VI (2005) Russia in the bologna process: problems, tasks, prospects. High Educ Today 5:16–21Google Scholar
  4. Belkanov N (2001) Russian education: looking for its place in the context of globalism. Bull High School 1:25–30Google Scholar
  5. Belukhin DA (2007) Pedagogical ethics: the wishful and the reality. Publishing house of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, 207 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Bezdukhov VP, Zhirnova TV (2008) Moral and value-related sphere of student conscience: diagnostics and forming. Publishing house of Moscow Psychological and Social Institute, Moscow, 202 pGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezrukova VS (1989) Pedagogy of vocational and technical education. Theoretical bases. Publishing house of the Institute of Engineering and Pedagogy, Sverdlovsk, 88 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Blauberg IV (1997) The problem of integrity and the systemic approach. Moscow, 448 pGoogle Scholar
  9. Bologna process and its importance for Russia: integration of higher education in Europe (2005) In: Pursiaynov K, Medvedeva SA (eds), RETSEPT, Moscow, 360 pGoogle Scholar
  10. Brushlinskiy AV (1991) Problems of subject in the psychological science. Psychol J 12(6):3–10Google Scholar
  11. Buchberger F (2002) Modelle der Lehrerbildung in einzelnen europäischen Ländern – Impulse wider Nachdenkensvermeidung und Camouflage. Kerncurricula in Schule und Lehrerbildung, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Campos B (2004) The balance between higher education autonomy and public quality assurance: development of the Portuguese system for teacher education accreditation. Educ Policy Anal Arch 12(73):1–33Google Scholar
  13. Erofeev DS (2006) The development of the contemporary classical universities in Russia within the context of the Bologna process (pedagogical aspect): PhD thesis. KSU publishing house, KrasnodarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fatkullina FG, Morozkina EA, Suleimanova AK (2015) Modern higher education: problems and perspectives. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 214:571–577. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815061170. Accessed 28 Aug 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fatkullina F, Morozkina E, Suleimanova A, Khayrullina R (2016) Terminological multifaceted educational dictionary of active type as a possible way of special discourse presentation. Int J Environ Sci Educ 11(17):10081–10089Google Scholar
  16. Freire P (1972) Education: the practice of freedom. Writers and Readers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Galperin PY (2008) Lectures on psychology. KDU, Moscow, 346 pGoogle Scholar
  18. Ganter M (1987) The nature of leadership. New Manag 4:52–69Google Scholar
  19. Gibb C (1954) Leadership. Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, 148 pGoogle Scholar
  20. Gvishiani DM (1970) Organization and management. Science, Moscow, 382 pGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodgkinson C (1983) The Philosophy of Leadership. Oxford, 225 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Khutorskoy AV (2015) Doctrine of human education in the Russian Federation. Eidos publishers; Publishing house of the Institute of Human Education, Moscow, 24 pGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazarev G, Martynenko O (2005) Regional university: ways of integration within the Bologna process. High Educ Russia 10:12–22Google Scholar
  24. Lektorskiy VA (2009) On the way to non-classical epistemology. IFRAN, Moscow, 237 pGoogle Scholar
  25. Leontiev AA (1997) Fundamentals of psycholingsuitics. Smysl SPF, Moscow, 287 pGoogle Scholar
  26. Luria AR (2003) Psychological heritage. Smysl publishers, Moscow, 434 pGoogle Scholar
  27. Manuylov YS (1997) Environment-based approach in upbringing: PhD thesis. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  28. Nemov RS (2003) Psychology of education: a textbook for students of higher pedagogical educational institutions. VLADOS, Moscow, 608 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Orlov AB (2002) Psychology of personality and essence of man: paradigms, projections and practices: a study manual for students of psychological faculties of higher educational institutions. Academia publishing center, Moscow, 272 pGoogle Scholar
  30. Panov VI (2007) Psychodidactics of educational systems: theory and practice. Piter, Saint Petersburg, 352 pGoogle Scholar
  31. Pulyaev VT (1998) New paradigm of the development of education and main outlines of its implementation in Russia. Soc Political J 5:3–20Google Scholar
  32. Schuster HJ (2001) Modelle und ihr Schicksal betrachtet am Beispiel der Freien Universitaet Berlin und der Universitaet des Saarlandes. Wissenschaftsrecht, Wissenschaftsverwaltung, Wissenschaftsforderung 34(2):115–134Google Scholar
  33. Semushina LG, Yaroshenko NG (2001) The content and technologies of teaching at specialized secondary educational institutions: a study manual for teachers of institutions of secondary vocational education. Mastery, Moscow, 272 pGoogle Scholar
  34. Shvyrev VS (1978) The theoretical and the empirical in scientific cognition. Moscow, 156 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Slobodchikov VI, Isaev EI (2013) Psychology of human development. The development of subjective reality in onthogenesis: a study manual. Publishing house of OSTHU, Moscow, 98 pGoogle Scholar
  36. Vershinina EV (2004) The Bologna declaration as a natural product of economic integration in the European region. Globalization and education. The Bologna process: “round table” materials. Alfa-M, Moscow, pp 94–98Google Scholar
  37. Vygotskiy LS (1999) Pedagogical psychology. Pedagogika-press, Moscow, 536 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Yakimanskaya IS (1995) Differentiated learning: “external” and “internal” forms. Headmaster 3:46–52Google Scholar
  39. Zhukov VI (2004) Russian education: problems and prospects of development. Finstatinform, Moscow, 125 pGoogle Scholar
  40. Zimnyaya IA (2000) Pedagogical psychology. Logos publishing corporation, Moscow, 384 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Almira Suleymanova
    • 1
  • Flyuza Fatkullina
    • 2
  • Halisa Ismagilova
    • 1
  1. 1.Ufa State Petroleum Technological UniversityUfaRussian Federation
  2. 2.Bashkir State UniversityUfaRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations