Advertisement

The Experience of the Leading EU Countries in Contention with Shadow Economy: Recommendations for Ukraine

  • Alexey Diachenko
  • Alexander Galytskiy
  • Olena Borzenko
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

In modern conditions of global market transformations, the change of technological state of Ukraine’s self-awarenessas an independent country (which is a component of European integrational processes) assumed features of the state strategy and a key priority of the stable social and economic development. Herewith, one of the main tasks of Ukraine’s integration into the European area is the construction of the society-oriented economy and implementation into practice of the democratic state standards. The problem of unshadowing of economic relations, which have become the result of market transformation of the national economy due to the great extent and different forms of shadow process demonstration, essential influence on the economic dynamics, also demands immediate solution. An interesting fact is that unlike Ukraine the shadow economy is almost absent in the EU countries in such sectors as extraction of minerals, electric power industry, and finances. Herewith, shadow economy has become a certain balancer of the western countries’ economy, that is, the less is an incremental capacity in the official sector, the higher is the rise in the illegal one and vice versa. At the same time, it is rational to implement recommendations, which were introduced by the FATF, World Bank, and Тransparency International Ukraine, into national social and economic system not only because they are effective, complete each other, and are aimed at coping with immediate national economic problems but firstly because observance of the generally accepted world standards is an important step in acceleration of European integration processes. They increase the level of trust of the foreign partner countries toward Ukraine with the help of transformation of the national economy to the European standards.

References

  1. Čábelková I, Strielkowski W, Mirvald M (2015) Business influence on the mass media: a case study of 21 countries. Transform Bus Econ 14(1):65–75Google Scholar
  2. Chamberlin G (2015) Coordinating monetary and fiscal policies in the open economy. Int Econ Lett 4(1):15–25.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2015.4.1.2 Google Scholar
  3. Euronews (2015) The shadow economy in EU countries: how to bring workers to the light? http://ru.euronews.com/2015/11/23/shining-a-light-on-europe-s-shadow-economy. Accessed 19 Oct 2017
  4. Global Risks Report (2011) An initiative of the risk response network. Jan 2011. World Economic Forum. http:// riskreport.weforum.org/global-risks-2011.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2017
  5. Gryshova I (2015) Ukraine’s positions in international ratings evaluation as a factor of its competitiveness. Econ Ann XXI(5–6):24–27Google Scholar
  6. Gryshova І, Negodenko VS, Shestakovska TL (2017a) The methodological principles of determining the level of performance of the functions of consumerism. Sci Bull Polissia 3(11):62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gryshova I, Shestakovska T, Glushko O (2017b) The economic measurement of convergence of the institutional impact on the sustainability of development. Sci Notes Inst Legis Verkhovna Rada Ukraine 4:75–80Google Scholar
  8. Jiroudková A, Rovná LA, Strielkowski W, Šlosarčík I (2015) EU accession, transition and further integration for the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Econ Soc 8(2):11–25.  https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-2/1 Google Scholar
  9. Kapitsa LM (2014) Shadow globalization. Bull MGIMO-Univ 3:69–81Google Scholar
  10. Kharazishvili YM (2016) Shadow economy and shadow wages in Ukraine: estimates and forecasts. http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/SR/article/view/4542
  11. Koretskaya SO (2011) “Shadow economy”: consequences and methods of overcoming. Invest Pract Experience 20:15–18Google Scholar
  12. Kurbanov KR (2014) Differentiation of income distribution as a factor of influence on economic development of the country. http://duep.edu/res/files/2100/Kurbanov.doc
  13. Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine (2016) General tendencies of the shadow economy in Ukraine. http://www.me.gov.ua. Accessed 20 Oct 2017
  14. Mostenska T (2015) Informal market as a result of shadow economy. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 4(2):23–29.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2015.4.2.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moyseyenko I, Ryvak N (2016) Indirect taxes in the mechanism of state regulation. Int Econ Lett 5(2):63–71.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2016.5.2.4 Google Scholar
  16. Naumov OB (2016) Institutional determinants and strategic directions of economic development of the national economy. Sci Notes Inst Legis Verkhovna Rada Ukraine 5:89–95Google Scholar
  17. Naumov OB (2017) Strategic vectors of state regulation of agro-industrial production: tools and methods of consolidation of development resources. Sci Notes Inst Legis Verkhovna Rada Ukraine 4:93–100Google Scholar
  18. Pichugina YV (2015) Specificity of the functioning of the shadow economy of the EU. Glob Nat Probl Econ 5:71–74Google Scholar
  19. Schneider F, Kearney A (2013) The shadow economy in Europe. http://www.iberglobal.com/files/2015/Shadow_Economy_Europe.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2017
  20. Strielkowski W, Gryshova I (2017) Ukrainian labour migration in the Czech Republic. Sci Bull Polissia 4:224–231Google Scholar
  21. Zielińska A (2016) Information is a market products and information markets. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 5(4):31–38.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2016.5.4.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexey Diachenko
    • 1
  • Alexander Galytskiy
    • 1
  • Olena Borzenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Odessa State Agrarian UniversityOdessaUkraine
  2. 2.Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of UkraineKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations