Informal Leadership Community Education in the United Kingdom: A Lesson for Russia

  • Elena Soltovets
  • Anna Bondarenko
  • Oksana Chigisheva
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The paper deals with the concept of leadership developed through informal learning as an object of scientific scrutiny in Great Britain and Russian Federation. The relevance of the study is to create awareness of the scope and character of existing research on informal leadership education within the framework of community development specific to both countries. The article aims at providing quantitative analysis of the British and Russian researchers’ publications on the issue and covers the papers available in ProQuest and the Russian State Library databases. The method of content analysis is used to obtain the data that give ground for further comparative interpretation. The dynamics of publication activity is being analysed chronologically, and the thematic fields are being specified for the research carried out in the countries under consideration. The findings of the study highlight the gaps in understanding of the phenomena and help identify opportunities for best practices promulgating.

References

  1. Bennetts C (2003) Mentoring youth: trend and tradition. Br J Guid Couns 31(1):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billett S (2001) Learning in the workplace: strategies for effective practice. Allen & Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  3. Chigisheva O (2010) International education for the millennium: toward access, equity and quality. Review. Comp J Comp Int Educ 40(1):130–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chigisheva O (2011) Transitions from education to work: new perspectives from Europe and beyond. Review. Comp J Comp Int Educ 41(5):712–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chigisheva O (2015a) Internationalisation of current academic research in pedagogy and education. Proc Soc Behav Sci 214:866–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chigisheva O (2015b) Lifelong transition trajectory for the international researcher. Proc Soc Behav Sci 180:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chigisheva O (2015c) Transformation of pedagogical theory and methodology in the focus of globalization. Proc Soc Behav Sci 180:262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2008) Research methods in education. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Colley H (2003) Engagement mentoring for disaffected youth: a new model of mentoring for social inclusion. Br Educ Res J 29(4):521–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornforth Ch (2005) Developing a ‘Government’ Strategy for Improving Governance in the Voluntary and Community Sector in the UK. The ‘Boards and Beyond’. Conference Proceedings. http://bloch.umkc.edu/mwcnl/resources/documents/conferences-2005/chris-cornforth.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017
  11. Cullen J, Batterbury S, Foresti M, Lyons C (2000) Informal learning and widening participation. DfEE Research Report No. 191. https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RR191.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2017
  12. Davis P (1974) Data description and presentation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Department for Communities and Local Government. Communities in Control: Real people, real power. White Paper (2008) https://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/886045.pdf. Accessed on 2 Aug 2017
  14. Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. The Learning Revolution (2009) www.dius.gov.uk/skills/engaging_learners/informal_adult_learning/white_paper.aspx. Accessed 9 Aug 2017
  15. Doyle ME, Smith MK (2001a) ‘Classical leadership’, the encyclopedia of informal education. http://www.infed.org/leadership/traditional_leadership.htm. Accessed 13 Aug 2017
  16. Doyle ME, Smith MK (2001b) ‘Shared leadership’, the encyclopedia of informal education. http://www.infed.org/leadership/shared_leadership.htm, http://www.infed.org/leadership/traditional_leadership.htm. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  17. Gilchrist R, Jeffs T (2000) Settlements, social change and community action: making good neighbours. Jessica Kingsley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Gola G (2009) Informal learning of social workers: a method of narrative inquiry. J Work Learn 21(4):334–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hague K, Logan A (2009) A review of the current landscape of adult informal learning using digital technologies. General educators report. Futurelab, BristolGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeffs T, Smith M (1999) Informal education: conversation, democracy and learning. Education Now, DerbyshireGoogle Scholar
  21. Marsick VJ, Watkins KE (1990) Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. McGivney V (1999) Informal learning in the community: a trigger for change and development. National Institute of Adult and Continuing Education, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  23. Melnichuk MV, Osipova VM, Kondrakhina NG (2017) Market-oriented LSP training in higher education: towards higher communicative skills. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 13(8):5073–5084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nemerowicz G, Rosi E (1997) Education for leadership and social responsibility. Falmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Philip K (2003) Youth mentoring: the American dream comes to the UK. Br J Guid Couns 31(1):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Philip K, King C, Shucksmith J (2009) A qualitative study of mentoring interventions with young people. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Principles and practice of informal education: Learning through life (2001) In: Richardson LD, Wolfe M (eds). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. ProQuest Database (2017) http://www.proquest.com/. Accessed 11 Aug 2017
  29. Russian State Library Database (2017) https://www.rsl.ru/. Accessed 11 Aug 2017
  30. Sandfort RA, Armour KM, Crossman D (2005) Informal educators or just “additional adults”?: examining the role of adult volunteers within youth physical activity programmes. The British Educational Research Association Annual Conference Proceedings. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/154203.htm. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  31. Social Exclusion Unit. Inclusion Through Innovation. (2005) www.neighbourhood.gov.uk/case.asp?id=1617. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  32. Trinder K, Guiller J, Margaryan A, Littlejohn A, Nicol D (2008) Learning from digital natives: bridging formal and informal learning. Research project report. The Higher education academy: Glasgow Caledonian University, GlasgowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Soltovets
    • 1
  • Anna Bondarenko
    • 2
  • Oksana Chigisheva
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Federal UniversityRostov-on-DonRussian Federation
  2. 2.International Research Centre “Scientific Cooperation”Rostov-on-DonRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations