Advertisement

Integrated Sentiment and Emotion into Estimating the Similarity Among Entries on Social Network

  • Thi Hoi Nguyen
  • Dinh Que Tran
  • Gia Manh Dam
  • Manh Hung NguyenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 221)

Abstract

Similar measures play an important role in information processing and have been widely investigated in computer science. With the exploration of social media such as Youtube, Wikipedia, Facebook etc., a huge number of entries have been posted on these portals. They are often described by means of short text or sets of words. Discovering similar entries based on such texts has become challenges in constructing information searching or filtering engines and attracted several research interests. In this paper, we firstly introduce a model of entries posted on media or entertainment portals, which is based on their features composed of title, category, tags, and content. Then, we present a novel similar measure among entries that incorporates their features. The experimental results show the superiority of our incorporation similarity measure compared with the other ones.

Keywords

Similar measure Social network Text Entry Social media 

References

  1. 1.
    Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sayal, R., Kumar, V.V.: A novel similarity measure for clustering categorical data sets. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 17(1), 25–30 (2011). Published by Foundation of Computer ScienceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reddy, G.S., Krishnaiah, R.V.: A novel similarity measure for clustering categorical data sets. IOSR J. Comput. Eng. (IOSRJCE) 4(6), 37–42 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nguyen, M.H., Nguyen, T.H.: A general model for similarity measurement between objects. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA) 6(2), 235–239 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buscaldi, D., Roux, J.L., Flores, J.J.G., Popescu, A.: Lipn-core: Semantic text similarity using n-grams, wordnet, syntactic analysis, esa and information retrieval based features (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han, L., Kashyap, A.L., Finin, T., Mayfield, J., Weese, J.: Semantic textual similarity systems. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pp. 44–52. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, June 2013Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, M.C., Chang, J.W., Hsieh, T.C.: A grammar-based semantic similarity algorithm for natural language sentences. Sci. World J. 2014, 17 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marsi, E., Moen, H., Bungum, L., Sizov, G., Gambäck, B., Lynum, A.: Combining strong features for semantic similarity. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pp. 66–73. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, June 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oliva, J., Serrano, J.I., del Castillo, M.D., Iglesias, Á.: Symss: a syntax-based measure for short-text semantic similarity. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(4), 390–405 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agirre, E., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez-Agirre, A., Guo, W.: Semantic textual similarity. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pp. 32–43. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, June 2013Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nguyen, M.H., Tran, D.Q.: A semantic similarity measure between sentences. South-East Asian J. Sci. 3(1), 63–75 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tran, D.Q., Nguyen, M.H.: A mathematical model for semantic similarity measures. South-East Asian J. Sci. 1(1), 32–45 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Novelli, A.D.P., Oliveira, J.M.P.D.: Article: a method for measuring semantic similarity of documents. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 60(7), 17–22 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bollegala, D., Matsuo, Y., Ishizuka, M.: A web search engine-based approach to measure semantic similarity between words. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23(7), 977–990 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buscaldi, D., Rosso, P., Gomez-Soriano, J.M., Sanchis, E.: Answering questions with an n-gram based passage retrieval engine. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 34(2), 113–134 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Croce, D., Storch, V., Basili, R.: Combining text similarity and semantic filters through sv regression. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pp. 59–65. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, June 2013Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Finkel, J.R., Grenager, T., Manning, C.: Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2005, pp. 363–370. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lintean, M.C., Rus, V.: Measuring semantic similarity in short texts through greedy pairing and word semantics. In: Youngblood, G.M., McCarthy, P.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Marco Island, Florida, 23–25 May 2012. AAAI Press (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Proisl, T., Evert, T., Greiner, P., Kabashi, B.: Robust semantic similarity at multiple levels using maximum weight matching. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp. 532–540. Association for Computational Linguistics and Dublin City University, Dublin, August 2014Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Šarić, F., Glavaš, G., Karan, M., Šnajder, J., Bašić, B.D.: Takelab: systems for measuring semantic text similarity. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics - Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2012, pp. 441–448. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Severyn, A., Nicosia, M., Moschitti, A.: Tree kernel learning for textual similarity. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pp. 53–58. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, June 2013Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sultan, M.A., Bethard, S., Sumner, T.: Sentence similarity from word alignment. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp. 241–246. Association for Computational Linguistics and Dublin City University, Dublin, August 2014Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu, J., Lu, Q.: Computing semantic textual similarity using overlapped senses. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pp. 90–95. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, June 2013Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen, T.H., Tran, D.Q., Dam, G.M., Nguyen, M.H.: Multi-feature based similarity among entries on media portals. In: Akagi, M., Nguyen, T.-T., Vu, D.-T., Phung, T.-N., Huynh, V.-N. (eds.) ICTA 2016. AISC, vol. 538, pp. 373–382. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49073-1_41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Congnitive Structure of Emotions. The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frijda, N.H.: The Emotions: Studies in Emotion & Social Interaction. Edition de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, ser edn. Cambridge University Press, Paris (1986)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reisenzein, R.: Emotions as metarepresentational states of mind: Naturalizing the belief-desire theory of emotion. Cognit. Syst. Res. 10(1), 6–20 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thi Hoi Nguyen
    • 1
  • Dinh Que Tran
    • 2
  • Gia Manh Dam
    • 1
  • Manh Hung Nguyen
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Vietnam Commercial UniversityHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology (PTIT)HanoiVietnam
  3. 3.UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)HanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations