Skip to main content

The Early History of Logical Form

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 476 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 393))

Abstract

The term ‘logical form’ is generally used to denote a property of sentences. The property denoted is called ‘logical’ because it is regarded as important from the logical point of view, and it is called ‘form’ because it is taken to be distinct from the specific semantic features that constitute their matter. As a first approximation, we can say that one has a notion of logical form if one thinks that there is such a property, independently of whether one deliberately employs some expression that refers to that property. So it is reasonable to presume that some understanding of logical form existed long before the term ‘logical form’ was introduced in the philosophical lexicon. As this chapter will explain, the idea of logical form is as old as logic itself. Its origin lies in the recognition of patterns of inference that can be identified by schematizing some of the expressions that occur in their instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Aristotle, Topics 100a25, in Aristotle (1958).

  2. 2.

    Plato (1991), 436b–436d.

  3. 3.

    Aristotle (1958), 113b22.

  4. 4.

    Aristotle (1949), 41b36. This is not exactly the way Aristotle phrased a syllogism, but the differences of formulation will be ignored here and in what follows.

  5. 5.

    In reality, the moods traditionally classified are four. Aristotle’s theory did include a fourth figure, even though, due to differences of formulation, he did not recognize it as a separate figure.

  6. 6.

    Euclid (2002), V, Aristotle (1934), 1132b.

  7. 7.

    A detailed exposition of the system is provided in Kneale (1962), pp. 158–176, and in Mates (1973). A more recent work that focuses on issues related to logical form is Barnes (2009).

  8. 8.

    According to Buridan (1976), 1.7.2, categorematic expressions provide the matter (materia) of sentences, while syncategorematic expressions indicate their form (forma).

  9. 9.

    Abelard (1956), pp. 161 and 123.

  10. 10.

    Abelard (1956), pp. 136–138, 162.

  11. 11.

    Ockham (1974), p. 7.

  12. 12.

    Ockham (1974), pp. 44–47.

  13. 13.

    Spade and Panaccio (2011) provide more detailed accounts of Ockham’s position.

  14. 14.

    Leibniz (1875–1890), Lull (1609), Hobbes (1656).

  15. 15.

    Leibniz (1875–1890), p. 184, Leibniz (1903), p. 30.

  16. 16.

    Leibniz (1875–1890), p. 200.

  17. 17.

    This is not to say that Leibniz was the first or the only author of his time who postulated such a close connection between logic and mathematics. As Mugnai (2010) explains, different authors, before or independently of Leibniz, had made attempts to express logic in mathematical form or to use logic to give some firm ground to mathematical proofs.

References

  • Abelard, P. (1956). Dialectica. Van Gorcum: Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1934). The Nicomachean ethics (Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 19). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1949). Prior and posterior analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1958). Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (2009). Truth, etc: Six lectures on ancient logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, J. (1976). Tractatus de Consequentiis. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euclid. (2002). Elements. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Green Lion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1656). Elements of philosophy concerning body. London: Leybourn for Andrew Crooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1875–1890). Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz. C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin : Weidman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1903). Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. L. Couturat. Paris: Alcan

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull, R. (1609). Raymundi Lullii Opera ea…. Argentorati: Zetzner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mates, B. (1973). Stoic logic. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugnai, M. (2010). Logic and mathematics in the seventeenth century. History and Philosophy of Logic, 31, 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, W. (1974). Summa logicae. In S. Brown, P. Boehner, & G. Gàl (Eds.), Opera philosophica et theologica. St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1991). The Republic: The complete and unabriged Jowett translation. New York: Vintage Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, P. V., & Panaccio, C. (2011). William of Ockham. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iacona, A. (2018). The Early History of Logical Form. In: Logical Form. Synthese Library, vol 393. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics