Advertisement

The Changing Nature of Global Marketing: A New Perspective

  • James Agarwal
  • Terry Wu
Chapter

Abstract

There have been significant changes in the global marketing landscape that is presenting contemporary threats and opportunities in markets, institutions, and technology for global marketers. Much of the mainstream research on global marketing has focused on the traditional marketing strategy combined with the traditional paradigms to analyze international markets. Global companies need to challenge traditional assumptions in global marketing in an era of shifting political, cultural, economic, and technological changes. Given scant research attention on the emerging issues in global marketing for the twenty-first century, there is a critical need for a new research direction to shed new insights into emerging and cutting-edge issues in global marketing. This book examines emerging theories and frameworks of global marketing and discusses how global marketing strategies are evolving and being re-calibrated in a globalized and digital economy that is fast changing.

References

  1. Agarwal, J., and T. Wu. 2004. China’s entry to WTO: Global marketing issues, impact, and implications. International Marketing Review 21 (3): 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2015. Factors influencing growth potential of E-commerce in emerging economies: An institution-based N-OLI framework. Thunderbird International Business Review 57 (3): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal, J., N.K. Malhotra, and R.N. Bolton. 2010. A cross-national and cross-cultural approach to global market segmentation: An application using consumers’ perceived service quality. Journal of International Marketing 18 (3): 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnihotri, R., R. Dingus, M.Y. Hu, and M.T. Krush. 2016. Social media: Influencing customer satisfaction in B2B sales. Industrial Marketing Management 53: 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman, J.E. 2013. Success in Africa: CEO insights from a continent on the rise. Brookline: Bibliomotion.Google Scholar
  6. Jormanainen, I., and P.C.A. Koveshnikov. 2012. International activities of emerging market firms. Management International Review 52: 691–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lund, S., J. Manyika, and J. Bughin. 2016. Globalization is becoming more about data and less about stuff. Harvard Business Review 94 (3):2–5.Google Scholar
  8. Merchant, H., R.L. Tung, and A. Verbeke. 2012. The tenuous link between cultural distance and international strategy: Navigating the assumptions of cross-cultural research. In Handbook of research on international strategic management, ed. Alain Verbeke and Hemant Merchant. Edward Elgar: UK.Google Scholar
  9. Meyer, K.E., and M.W. Peng. 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies 47: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prahalad, C.K., and A. Hammond. 2002. Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review 80 (9): 48–57.Google Scholar
  11. Ramamurti, R. 2012. What is really different about emerging market multi-nationals? Global Strategy Journal 2: 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schu, M., D. Morschett, and B. Swoboda. 2016. Internationalization speed of online retailers: A resource-based perspective on the influence factors. Management International Review 56: 733–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Trent, R.J., and R.M. Monczka. 2002. Pursuing competitive advantage through integrated global sourcing. Academy of Management Executive 16 (2): 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tung, R.L. 2008. The cross-cultural research imperative: The need to balance cross national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (1): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Hoorn, A., and R. Maseland. 2016. How institutions matter for international business: Institutional distance effects vs. institutional profile effects. Journal of International Business Studies 47: 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Hoorn, A., and R. Maseland. 2016. How institutions matter for international business: Institutional distance effects vs. institutional profile effects. Journal of International Business Studies 47: 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang, Z., C. Su, and K.S. Fam. 2012. Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: Governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency. Journal of Marketing 76 (3): 41–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Haskayne Research Professor & Full Professor of Marketing at the Haskayne School of BusinessUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Business and Information TechnologyUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada

Personalised recommendations