Skip to main content

The Model of Assessment for Flexographic Printing Technology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017) (EPPM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 1263 Accesses

Abstract

The popularity of flexographic printing in the group of printing manufacture owners is increasing all over the world. The demand of the market for low-cost and repeatable expenditures has pushed companies to look for alternatives of costly printing techniques such as rotogravure or heat-set offset. The main purpose of the article is to present precise characteristics of the flexographic printing technology and to propose a suitable evaluation model. The model takes into account important measures from the flexographic point of view (e.g. type of raw material, colour quantity, printing speed) and also important elements for the enterprise’s strategy (e.g. product quality, financial feasibility). The article was written in a theoretical and research manner. The following research methods and approaches were used: literary criticism, integrated method, holistic approach to assessment, system approach. The research is also based on personal experience of people connected with flexographic printing and data gathered from printing companies. The main result of the paper is the flexographic printing technology assessment model based on a holistic approach to assessment and a paradigm of new economy. The authors present elements not used before for the assessment of the printing technology (e.g. environmental protection) and use the two stages of the assessment (dimension—measure).The developed model may be used in flexographic printing companies and complement literature connected with the research area. The model will help to understand the complexity of the flexographic printing technology and also enable companies to improve the efficiency and quality of flexographic printing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bates I, Zjakic I, Budimir I (2015) Assessment of the print quality parameters’ impact on the high-quality flexographic print visual experience. Imaging Sci J 63(2):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743131X14Y.0000000094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn T (2015) Flexographic printing. Flex Packag 2015:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-26436-5.00003-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DuPont (2017) Life cycle assessment verified by independent third party. http://www.dupont.co.uk/products-and-services/printing-package-printing/flexographic-platemaking-systems/brands/cyrel/articles/life-cycle-assessment.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2017

  4. Ejsmont K, Lipiak J (2015) Implementation of the SMED method in a printing company. Econ Organ Enterp 4(783):104–116

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ejsmont K, Lipiak J (2016) The problem of calculating the OEE for flexo machines—case study. In: Knosala R (ed) Innovations in management and production engineering. Opole

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geoff AG (2000) Design and technology of packaging decoration for the consumer market. Academic Press, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon LR (2012) Food packaging: principles and practice, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  8. Izdebska J (2016) Printing on polymers. Theory Pract. William Andrew

    Google Scholar 

  9. Janßen EM, Schliephacke R, Breitenbach A, Breitkreutz J (2013) Drug-printing by flexographic printing technology—A new manufacturing process for orodispersible films. Int J Pharm 441(1–2):818–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz S (2013) Shrink sleeve converting. Rodman Media, Ramsey USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kipphan H (2001) Handbook of print media: technol production methods. Springer, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kit LY (2009) The wiley encyclopedia of packaging technology, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lipiak J (2017) Methodology for assessing the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of flexographic printing process. Procedia Eng 182:403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenz A, Senne A, Rohde J et al (2015) Evaluation of flexographic printing technology for multi-busbar solar cells. Energy Procedia 67:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Majid I, Nayik GA, Dar SM, Nanda V (2016) Novel food packaging technologies: innovations and future prospective. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.11.003

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marciniak S (1989) The integrated method of efficiency evaluation of technical and organizational projects. Warsaw University of Technology Publishing House, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanatgar RH, Campagne C, Nierstrasz V (2017) Investigation of the adhesion properties of direct 3D printing of polymers and nano composites on textiles: effect of FDM printing process parameters. Appl Surf Sci 403:551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith RD (2009) Challenges in winding flexible packaging film. In: TAPPI 12th European PLACE conference, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  19. Żołek-Tryznowska Z, Izdebska J (2013) Flexographic printing ink modified with hyperbranched polymers: Boltorn™ P500 and Boltorn™ P1000. Dyes Pigm 96(2):602–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by Prof. S. Marciniak from Warsaw University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Ejsmont .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ejsmont, K., Lipiak, J. (2018). The Model of Assessment for Flexographic Printing Technology. In: Ĺžahin, S. (eds) 8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017). EPPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74122-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74123-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics