Skip to main content

Risk Management: The Relationship Between Perceived Risk Factors of Crowd Disaster and Perceived Safety in Large Buildings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017) (EPPM 2017)

Abstract

Poor risk management within large buildings such as sport stadiums, concert halls, and religious buildings have resulted in crowd disasters in various venues across the world. Within the built environment, safety is considered in two main parts: objective safety (normative and substantive) and subjective safety (perceived). Facilities management within large buildings used by large crowds must involve effective risk management as a key component. Fruin suggested that Force, Information, Space and Time (FIST) are the main factors that influence the occurrence of crowd disaster. It has also been theorised that poor perceived safety alone could result into crowd disaster. By using the FIST model, this paper investigates the relationship between the four critical FIST factors and perceived safety in large buildings. The research chose to use the Holy Mosque in Makkah as a case study. The Holy Mosque is a large building of 356,800 m2 with a maximum capacity of two million users (pilgrims). Data was collected using iPad devices via a self-administered questionnaire distributed to 1940 pilgrims of 62 different nationalities. The results were analysed using SPSS for descriptive analysis and AMOS 22 for Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The findings clearly confirmed that there is a significant relationship between the FIST factors and perceived safety in large buildings. These findings will inform design consultants and facilities managers as they design and/or manage such facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alnabulsi H, Drury J (2014) Social identification moderates the effect of crowd density on safety at the Hajj. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:9091–9096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404953111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Awang Z (2015) SEM made simple: a gentle approach to learning structural equation modeling. MPWS Rich Publication

    Google Scholar 

  3. BIFM (2014) The facilities management professional standards

    Google Scholar 

  4. Booty F (2009) Facilities management handbook, 4th edn. Library of Congress

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickie JF (1995) Major crowd catastrophes. Saf Sci 18:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fruin JJ (1993) The causes and prevention of crowd disasters. Eng Crowd Safety: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model: A Multidisciplinary J 6:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim D, Lee K, Sirgy J (2016) Examining the differential impact of human crowding versus spatial crowding on visitor satisfaction at a festival. J Travel Tourism Mark 33:293–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1024914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehta V (2013) The street: a quintessential social public space. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Still GK (2016) Crowd safety and risk analysis. http://www.gkstill.com/ExpertWitness/CrowdDisasters.html

  11. Zohrabi M (2013) Mixed method research: instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory Pract Lang Stud 3:254–262

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Alkhadim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alkhadim, M., Gidado, K., Painting, N. (2018). Risk Management: The Relationship Between Perceived Risk Factors of Crowd Disaster and Perceived Safety in Large Buildings. In: Şahin, S. (eds) 8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017). EPPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74122-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74123-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics