Skip to main content

Mass Society Paradigm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Why Democracies Flounder and Fail

Abstract

From Aristotle to C. Wright Mills and Samuel Huntington, democratic politics has been viewed as possible only if civil society mediates between government and the masses. The present chapter traces the origins of democracy and how the Mass Society Paradigm developed from Durkheim’s evidence that industrialization produced alienated factory workers, anthropological studies of elites in small American towns, Mills’s observation that colluding elites were trying to fool the masses with the clever use of media, and Kornhauser’s equivalencing of mass society in both totalitarian and supposedly democratic societies. Much of the discussion demonstrates how Robert Dahl initially rejected but later supported the paradigm, whereas Robert Putnam discovered masses detached from one another as the source of much societal anomie that precludes true democracy, but still stopped short of recognizing the need to confront the entire complexity of the Mass Society Paradigm before democracy can be revitalized. The paradigm accounts for civil strife, deviant behavior, economic stagnation, governmental gridlock, mass movements, nonvoting and nonparticipation in politics, religious fundamentalism, revolutions, scapegoating, war, and worldwide anarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham, Steven E. (1996). “The Impact of the Taft–Hartley Act on the Balance of Power in Industrial Relations,” American Business Law Journal, 33 (3): 341–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodore, Else Frenkel-Bunswick, Daniel Levinson, and Nevitt Sanford (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alex-Assensoh, Yvette M. (2002). “Social Capital, Civic Engagement, and the Importance of Context.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 9. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, William S. (1965). The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town, 1930–1935. Chicago: Quadrangle, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, Gabriel A. (1956). “Comparative Political Systems,” Journal of Politics, 18 (3): 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, Gabriel A. (1960). “Introduction: A Functional Approach to Comparative Politics.” In Politics of the Developing Areas, ed. Gabriel A. Almond and James S. Coleman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena, Philip, and Daehee Bak (2015). “Diversionary Incentives, Rally Effects, and Crisis Bargaining,” Foreign Policy Analysis, 11 (2): 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayorech, Ziada, Sophie von Stumm, Claire M. A. Haworth, Oliver S. P. Davis, and Robert Piomin (2017). “Personalized Media: A Genetically Informative Investigation of Individual Differences in Online Media Use,” PLOS ONE, 10 (137). journals.plos.org/plosone , January 23. Accessed February 7, 2017.

  • Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz (1962). “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review, 56 (4): 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz (1963). “Decisions and Nondecisions: A Framework for Analysis,” American Political Science Review, 57 (3): 632–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakunin, Mikhail (1873). Statism and Anarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, Randall (2010). The Making of Evangelism: From Revivalism to Politics and Beyond. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltzell, E. Digby (1958). Philadelphia Gentlemen: The Making of a National Upper Class. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, L. Frank (1900). The Wonderful World of Oz. Chicago: Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A. (1961). The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. New York: Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, Arthur F. (1908). The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berce, Yves-Marie (1974). History of Peasant Revolts: The Social Origins of Rebellion in Early Modern France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Helge, and Mark Spoerer (2001). “Economic Crises and European Revolutions of 1848,” Journal of Economic History, 61 (2): 293–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah (1958). Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicha, K. D. (1976). “Western Populists: Marginal Reformers of the 1890s,” Agricultural History, 50 (4): 626–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Jean (1566). Method for the Easy Comprehension of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Jean (1576). Six Books on the Commonwealth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, Carl (2002). “Social Capital as Political Fantasy.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 8. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brading, Ryan (2012). Populism in Venezuela. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtenshaw, Claude J. (1968). “The Political Theory of Pluralist Democracy,” Western Political Quarterly, 21 (4): 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camus, Albert (1951). The Rebel. New York: Knopf-Vintage, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, Hadley (1962). The Politics of Despair. New York: Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Paul Berry, and Joe Foweraker (2001). Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Confino, Michael, ed. (1973). Daughter of a Revolutionary: Natalia Herzer and the Bakunin-Nechayev Circle. LaSalle, IL: Library Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Stephen C., and Michael A. Maggiotto (1982). “Measuring Political Efficacy,” Political Methodology, 8 (3): 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, Bernard (2002). Democracy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michael J., Samuel P. Huntington, and Joji Watakuni (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Frank (2002). Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. London: Routlege.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1958). “A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model,” American Political Science Review, 52 (2): 462–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1970). After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1979). “A Review of ‘Who Really Rules?’ New Haven and Community Power Reexamined,” Social Science Quarterly, 60 (1): 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1985). A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1997). Toward Democracy: A Journey; Reflections: 1940–1997, 2 vols. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1998). On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. (2013). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Democracies, 6th edn. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1859). On the Origins of Species. New York: Signet, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, Alexis (1835–1840). Democracy in America. New York: Knopf, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques (1967). Speech and Phenomena. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, Charles (1838). Oliver Twist. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, Charles (1854). Hard Times. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. William (1978). Who Really Rules? New Haven and Community Power Reexamined. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S., David Downes, Christian Hunold, David Schlosberg, and Hans-Kristian Hernes (2003). Green States and Social Movements: Environmental in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John, and Patrick Dunleavy (2009). Theories of the Democratic State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, John, ed. (1992). Democracy: The Unfinished Journey: 508 bc to ad 1993. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (1893). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (1897). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (1912). Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, Kristine (2009). “From Armed Conflict to War: Ethnic Mobilization and Conflict Intensification,” International Studies Quarterly, 53 (2): 369–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, John (2002). “Equality, Democracy, and Communication from Toqueville to Putnam.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 2. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhower, Dwight D. (1961). Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960–1961. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, William Yandel, and Dwight MacDonald (1949). Western Political Heritage. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, Friedrich (1884). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: Pathfinder, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, Gary S. (1980). Poverty, Inequality, and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, Steven E. (1985). “Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science, 29 (4): 891–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, Biancamaria (2016). Germaine de Staël: A Political Portrait. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, Michael (2002). “The Labor Movement and the Language of Capital.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 11. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Dennis M., and Glenn Palmer (2006). “Presidents, Public Opinion, and Diversionary Behavior: The Role of Partisan Support Reconsidered,” Foreign Policy Analysis, 2 (3): 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Samuel (2017). “The Headquarters of Neo-Marxism,” New York Review of Books, 64 (5): 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund (1915). “Thoughts for the Times on War and Death.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 14, pp. 275–302. London: Hogarth, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund (1933). “Why War?,” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 22, pp. 199–215. London: Hogarth, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Amy (2002). “The Strange Disappearance of Alexis de Tocqueville in Putnam’s Analysis of Social Capital.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 1. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Carl Joachim, and Zbigniew Brzezinski (1956). Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabowitsch, Mischa (2017). Protest in Putin’s Russia. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth (1952). American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth (1958). The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerges, Fawak A. (2016). ISIS: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio (1957). The Modern Prince and Other Writings. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Oliver (2005). Migration and Inequality in Germany, 1870–1913. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grotius, Hugo (1625). De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted Robert (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (1968). “Social Change and National Aggressiveness, 1900–1960.” In Quantitative International Politics, ed. J. David Singer, pp. 215–244. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (1992a). Polity and Society: Philosophical Underpinnings of Social Science Paradigms. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (1994). Improving Human Rights. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael, ed. (1998). Multicultural Hawai’i: The Fabric of a Multiethnic Society. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael, ed. (2011). Barack Obama: The Aloha Zen President; How a Son of the 50th State May Revitalize America Based on 12 Multicultural Principles. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (2012b). Mr. Calm and Effective: Evaluating the Presidency of Barack Obama. Los Angeles: Publishinghouse for Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (2014b). International Human Rights: A Comprehensive Introduction, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (2014c). Neobehavioral Political Science: A Profession’s Fascinating History, Subfields, Paradigms, Research Agendas, Policy Applications, and Future. Los Angeles: Publishinghouse for Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (2016). How to Abolish Racism: Lessons from the State of Hawai’i. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (2017a). International Relations Theory: Competing Empirical Paradigms. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Michael (2017b). Political Science Revitalized: Filling the Jigsaw Puzzle with Metatheory. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols. Boston: Beacon, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen, and Seyla Ben-Habib (1981). “Modernity Versus Postmodernity,” New German Critique, 22 (1): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet, Bernt (1980). “The Theory of Mass Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic: A Re-Examination.” In Who Were the Fascists? Social Root of European Fascism, ed. Stein Ugelvik Larsen, Bernt Hagtvet, and Jan Petter Myklebust, pp. 66–117. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Richard (2001). Mass Society, Pluralism, and Bureaucracy: Explication, Assessment and Commentary. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanifan, Lyda J. (1916). “The Rural School Community Center,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67: 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Marvin (1968). The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassner, Ron E. (2011). “Blasphemy and Violence,” International Studies Quarterly, 55 (1): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich (1944). The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1820). Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David (2006). Models of Democracy, 3rd edn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hero, Rodney E. (2007). Racial Diversity and Social Capital: Inequality and Community in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas A. (1977). “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review, 71 (4): 1467–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan: Or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Charles (1970). The Depression of the Nineties: An Economic History. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Richard (1992). Social Darwinism in American Thought. Boston: Beacon, reprint edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, August de B. (1949). Elmtown’s Youth: The Impact of Social Classes on Adolescents. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. (1958). “Social Behavior as Exchange,” American Journal of Sociology, 63 (6): 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harper Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max (1947). Eclipse of Reason. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max, and Theodore Adorno (1947). Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Seabury Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Marc Morjé (2003). The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsi, Chu (1315). The Analects of Confucius. New York: Random House, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Michael (1972). Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Floyd (1953). Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Robert (1914). Violence and the Labor Movement. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. (1987). “The Goals of Development.” In Understanding Political Development, ed. Myron Weiner and Samuel P. Huntington, Chap. 1. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P., and Joan M. Nelson (1976). No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Thomas H. (1860). “The Origin of Species.” In Collected Essays: Darwiniana, pp. 71–79. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers (1966). Revolutionary Change. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1795). Perpetual Peace. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John (2009). The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John Maynard (1936). General Theory of Employment. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppell, Jonathan G. S. (2010). World Rule: Accountability, Legitimacy, and the Design of Global Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, William (1959). The Politics of Mass Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krastev, Ivan (2014). Democracy Disrupted: The Politics of Global Protest. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon (1955). “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review, 45 (1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. (1951a). The Policy Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. (1951b). The World Revolution of Our Time. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D., and Abraham Kaplan (1950). Power and Society: A Framework for Political Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, Gustave (1896). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Dunwoody, GA: Berg, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, Nicholas (2015). “Unhappy Days for America,” New York Review of Books, 62 (9): 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, Vladimir (1914). “The War and Russian Social-Democracy.” In Selected Works, ed. J. Fineberg, vol. 5, pp. 123–130. New York: International Publishers, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, Gerhard, Jean Lenski, and Patrick Nolan (1991). Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. (1989). “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique.” In Handbook of War Studies, ed. Manus I. Midlarsky, Chap. 11. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, Walter (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, Walter (1956). The Public Philosophy. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz, Ronnie D., and Cathleen Fogel (2002). “‘Regulation for the Rest of Us?’ Global Civil Society and the Privatization of Transnational Regulaton.” In The Emergence of Private Authority, ed. Rodney Bruce Hall and Thomas J. Bierseker, Chap. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John (1688). Second Treatise of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Marc (2016). The New Arab Wars: Uprising and Anarchy in the Middle East. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, Robert S., and Helen Merrill Lynd (1929). Middletown. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, Robert S., and Helen Merrill Lynd (1937). Middletown in Transition. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François (1979). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1943). Diagnosis of Our Time. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert (1964). One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Robert M. (1979). “Does Democracy Hinder Economic Development in Latecomer Developing Nations?,” Journal of Social Research, 2: 215–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels (1846). The German Ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Scott L., David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, eds. (2002). Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, Charles E. (1924). Non-Voting: Causes and Methods of Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Sarah (2005). Undermining Development: The Absence of Power among Local NGOs n Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Robert (1911). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchic Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Sydney: Wentworth, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright (1958). The Causes of World War Three. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Henry (2005). “Civic Literacy in Global Civil Society: Excluding the Majority from Democratic Participation.” In Criticizing Global Governance, ed. Markus Lederer and Phillipp S. Müller, Chap. 10. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, Baron de (1748). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravetz, David (1977). Twenty-Five Years of Economic Development: 1950–1979. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Lewis Henry (1870). Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Charles A. (1984). Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechayev, Sergei (1869). The Revolutionary Cathecism. See Confino, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Sigmund (1942). The Total State in a World at War. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Sigmund (1946). The Future in Perspective. New York: Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Kate (2004). “Transnational Protest: States, Circuses, and Conflict at the Frontline of Global Politics,” International Studies Review, 6 (2): 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, Anthony (1973). Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, James (2004). “A Profusion of Chancery Reform,” Law and History Review, 22 (4): 609–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, Vance (1959). The Hidden Persuaders. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, Michael (1973). Democracy for the Few, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, Vilfredo (1916). The Mind and Society. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Robert Ezra (1950). Race and Culture: Essays in the Sociology of Contemporary Man. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1951). The Social System. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1955). “McCarthyism and American Social Tension: A Sociologist’s View,” Yale Review, 44 (1): 226–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2015b). “Trust in Government: 1958−2015.” people-press.org , November 23. Accessed January 16, 2017.

  • Piazza, James A. (2008).”Incubators of Terror: Do Failed and Failing States Promote Transnational Terrorism?,” International Studies Quarterly, 52 (3): 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, Nelson W. (1963). Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (1995). “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy, 6 (1): 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (2015). Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D., and Lewis M. Feldstein, ed. (2003). Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, David (1817). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: Dent, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, James F. (2004). “Religion in World Politics: Why the Resurgence?,” International Studies Review, 6 (2): 271–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard, and Derek Unwin (1969). “Social Cohesion, Political Parties and Strains in Regimes,” Comparative Political Studies, 2 (1): 7–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762). Of the Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right. London: Penguin, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, William (1970). Blaming the Victim. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul (1945). Existentialism Is a Humanism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, John T., Ramiro Bernardo, and Brad Kile (2008). “Do Networks Solve Collective Action Problems? Credibility, Search, and Collaboration,” Journal of Politics, 70 (2): 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, David A. (2002). “The Phenomenology of Democracy: Putnam, Pluralism, and Voluntary Associations.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 3. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard, ed. (1969). Classic Essays on the Culture of Cities. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Ian (2003). The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg (1908). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, Jerome H. (1969). The Politics of Protest. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J. (1962). Theory of Collective Behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, James L., Corwin E. Kellstedt, and Lyman A. Guth (2009). The Bully Pulpit: The Politics of Protestant Clergy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library, n.d.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. Claire (2002). “Social Capital: The Politics of Race and Gender.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 7. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speier, Hans (1952). Social Order and the Risks of War: Papers in Political Sociology. New York: Stewart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert (1882). Political Institutions. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staël-Holstein, Anne Marie Germaine de (1788). Letters on the Writings and Character of J.-J. Rousseau. In Major Writings of Germaine de Staël. New York: Columbia University. Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, Manfred B. (2002). “Robert Putnam, Social Capital, and a Suspect Named Globalization.” In Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and Bowling Alone, ed. Scott L. McLean, David A. Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger, Chap. 12. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, William Graham (1918). War and Other Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharoor, Ishaan (2015). “What China’s Xi Jinping Thinks about Freedom,” Washington Post, July 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., and Florian Znaniecke (1918–1920). The Polish Peasant in Europe and Amereica. New York: Dover, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, Frederic (1927). The Gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles (1969). “Collective Violence in European Perspective.” In Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr, Chap. 1. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles, Louis Tilly, and Richard Tilly (1975). The Rebellious Century, 1830–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, Ferdinand (1887). Community and Society. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David B. (1951). The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Political Opinion. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, Sherry (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, Sherry (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Ralph, and Lewis Killian (1987). Collective Behavior, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schozman, and Henry Brady (1995). Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volokh, Eugene (1995). “Cheap Speech and What It Will Do,” Yale Law Review, 104 (7): 1805–1850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, Graham (1909). Human Nature in Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael (1995). “The Civil Society Argument.” In Theorizing Citizenship, ed. Ronald Beiner, Chap. 5. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. Lloyd (1949). Democracy in Jonesville: A Study in Quality and Inequality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. Lloyd, and Paul Lunt (1945). The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1918). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, William Foote (1943). Street Corner Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron (1964). Leadership in a Small Town. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Louis (1927). “The Ghetto,” American Journal of Sociology, 33 (1): 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Louis (1928). The Ghetto. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Louis (1938). “Urbanism as a Way of Life,” American Journal of Sociology, 44 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witters, Dan (2015). “Alaska Leads U.S. States in Well-Being for First Time,” gallup.com/poll/81547 , February 19. Accessed February 19, 2015.

  • Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1960). “Reputation and Reality in the Study of Community Power,” American Sociological Review, 25 (3): 636–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haas, M. (2019). Mass Society Paradigm. In: Why Democracies Flounder and Fail. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74070-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics