Abstract
After exploring several approaches and representational structures in the previous two chapters, we found that the formalism that best suits our needs is the dependency tree representation. Thus, in this chapter, we present a parser that is based on a dependency tree. This parser’s algorithm uses heuristic rules to infer dependency relationships between words, and it uses word co-occurrence statistics (which are learned in an unsupervised manner) to resolve ambiguities such as PP attachments. If a complete parse cannot be produced, a partial structure is built with some (if not all) dependency relations identified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Which used to be on www.xrce.xerox.com/research/mltt/demos/spanish.html, but seems to have been recently removed.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
The bar | stands for variants: estar | andar ← Ger stands for two rules, estar ← Ger and andar ← Ger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gelbukh, A., Calvo, H. (2018). Third Approach: Dependency Trees. In: Automatic Syntactic Analysis Based on Selectional Preferences. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74054-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74054-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74053-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74054-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)