Geras and Althusser

  • Mark Cowling
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses two short articles that Geras wrote about Althusser. Geras had already established that Marx had a theory of human nature, which was held continuously from 1844 onwards, and therefore has a good basis for disputing Althusser’s claim that in the older Marx there is no theory of human nature. Geras reviewed the main Althusserian theories, pointing out that he was forced to change them considerably under pressure of criticism. He argues that Althusser’s theories are basically useless. He plainly admires Althusser for questioning the continuance of the theory of alienation in the older Marx, and also for arguing that the older Marx is not a Hegelian. He also approves of the idea that the social totality is more complex than the Hegelian version of it. However, he criticizes Althusser’s conception of science as idealist, and his failure to recognize that Marxist theorists learn from the working class. Cowling points out that Marxist theorists do not learn the theories of political economy and its critique from the working class.

References

  1. Althusser, L. (2001). Lenin and Philosophy. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  2. Althusser, L. (2005). For Marx. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (2007). Reading Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Cowling, M. (1980). Resolving the Contradictions of Althusser’s Philosophy: Popperian Falsificationism as an Alternative to Hindess and Hirst’s Anti-Philosophy. Scottish Journal of Sociology, 4(2), 169–192.Google Scholar
  5. Cutler, T., Hindess, B., Hirst, P. Q., & Hussein, A. (1977 and 1978 respectively). Marx’s Capital and Capitalism Today (Vol. 1 and 2). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Geras, N. (1986). Literature of Revolution: Essays on Marxism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Hindess, B., & Hirst, P. Q. (1975). Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hindess, B., & Hirst, P. Q. (1977). Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-Critique of Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Cowling
    • 1
  1. 1.Teesside University [retired]MiddlesboroughUK

Personalised recommendations