Abstract
Many research areas widely use computer simulations, and their role in the production of scientific knowledge is nowadays the subject of debate in philosophy of science. This work presents the results of a phenomenographic case study involving three researchers who design and use computer simulations in physics. The study analyzes these designers’ views on simulations and the role of simulations in physics teaching. The results show that they agree on the fact that computer simulations have changed the way we do science and that they share many characteristics with the classical models: they derive from theories, they help to predict and explain phenomena, and their results need to be empirically validated. They consider simulations used in science teaching – that differ from those used in research in their objectives and in their design – to be useful as they allow students to visualize and work on a phenomenon from the viewpoint of the mathematical model, the physical, and the virtual one in an interrelated way. In general, the designers’ views on simulations and their use in science and education were more complex and meaningful than those conveyed by novice researchers in science teaching or found in research articles on secondary education that look at the same subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
http://www.conectarigualdad.gob.ar/Official website of Conectar Igualdad program.
- 2.
http://www.um.es/fem/PersonalWiki/Official website of Francisco Esquembre.
- 3.
http://www.sc.ehu.es/sbweb/fisica/Physics on the computer. Interactive Internet Course on Physics.
- 4.
http://modellus.co/index.php?lang=es Modellus’ official site, which offers a description of the software, its applications, and its theoretical framework.
References
Acevedo Díaz, J. A. (2008). El estado actual de la naturaleza de la ciencia en la didáctica de las ciencias. Revista Eureka Enseñanza de Divulgación Científica, 5(2), 134–169.
Bayraktar, S. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173–188.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cartwright, N. (1999). Models and the limits of theory: Quantum Hamiltonians and the BCS model of superconductivity. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspective on natural and social science (pp. 241–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201.
Doerr, H. (1997). Experiment, simulation and analysis: An integrated instructional approach to the concept of force. International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 265–282.
Durán, J. (2015). Nociones de simulación computacional: simulaciones y modelos científicos. Argumentos de Razón Técnica, 18, 87–110.
Galison, P. (1996). Computer simulation and the trading zone. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump (Eds.), The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power (pp. 118–157). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
González Ugalde, C. (2014). Investigación fenomenográfica. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 7(14), 141–158.
Greca, I. M., Seoane, M. E., & Arriassecq, I. (2014). Epistemological issues concerning computer simulations in science and their implications for science education. Science & Education, 23(1), 897–921.
Guillemot, H. (2010). Connections between simulations and observation in climate computer modeling. Scientist’s practices and “bottom-up epistemology” lessons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 242–252.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación (5th ed.). Santa Fe: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, A., & Lenhard, J. (2011). Toward a new culture of prediction: Computational modeling in the era of desktop computing. In A. Nordmann et al. (Eds.), Science transformed? Debating claims of an epochal break (pp. 189–200). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kirschner, P., & Huisman, W. (1998). Dry laboratories in science education: Computer-based practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 665–682.
Koponen, I. T., & Tala, S. (2014). Generative modelling in physics and in physics education: From aspects of research practices to suggestions for education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1143–1169). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kuppers, G., & Lenhard, J. (2005). Validation of simulation: Patterns in the social and natural sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(4), 1–13. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/3.html. Accessed 20 Jul 2016.
Lenhard, J. (2010). Computation and simulation. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on interdisciplinarity (pp. 246–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
López, S., Veit, E. A., & Araujo, I. S. (2016). Una revisión de la literatura sobre el uso de la modelación y simulación computacional para la enseñanza de la física en la educación básica y media. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 38(2), 1–16.
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of 25 reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
Morgan, M. S., & Morrison, M. (Eds.). (1999). Models as mediators: Perspective on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ören, T. I. (2011a). The many facets of simulation through a collection of about 100 definitions. SCS M&S Magazine, 2(2), 82–92.
Ören, T. I. (2011b). A critical review of definitions and about 400 types of modeling and simulation. SCS M&S Magazine, 2(3), 142–151.
Seoane, M. E., Arriassecq, I., & Greca, I. (2014). Implicancias epistemológicas en la utilización de simulaciones computacionales en diversas disciplinas científicas. VIII Reunião Latino-Americana sobre Ensino de Física, 3–7 November 2014, Salvador, Bahía, Brasil.
Seoane, M. E., Arriassecq, I., & Greca, I. (2015). Simulaciones computacionales: un análisis fenomenográfico. Revista Enseñanza de la Física, 27, 289–296.
Sismondo, S. (1999). Models, simulations and their objects. Science in Context, 12(2), 247–260.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370.
Winsberg, E. (1999). Sanctioning models: The epistemology of simulation. Science in Context, 12(2), 275–292.
Winsberg, E. (2003). Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science, 70, 105–125.
Winsberg, E. (2010). Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seoane, M.E., Arriassecq, I., Greca, I.M. (2018). Epistemological Debate Underlying Computer Simulations Used in Science Teaching: The Designers’ Perspective. In: Prestes, M., Silva, C. (eds) Teaching Science with Context. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74035-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74036-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)