Advertisement

Canadian Studies in the Nordic Countries

  • Robert C. ThomsenEmail author
  • Janne Korkka
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy book series (GPD)

Abstract

The establishment of the Nordic Association for Canadian Studies (NACS) in the 1980s coincided with a period during which the Canadian government engaged very actively in building an international Canadian Studies community. The young association received both moral and economic support from the Canadian state. Nevertheless, the first few years were an uphill struggle, convincing academic communities in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland that Canada was worth studying in its own right. This chapter seeks to explore the crucial role that funding for Canadian cultural diplomacy played in fostering the Canadian Studies community in the Nordic region. This Canadian government support enabled fruitful co-operation between the five Nordic countries, with other Canadian Studies associations in Europe and beyond, and also offered new ways of reaching across the Atlantic for both Canadian and Nordic experts. The chapter also discusses the more recent uphill struggle that NACS has faced after Canadian funding was cancelled in 2012. While efforts to foster a new generation of Canadianists continue, the Association has observed diminishing opportunities for research on Canada both within the Nordic countries and globally as well as a decline in Canada’s visibility in the region.

References

  1. Chartier, Daniel. 2007. Towards a Grammar of the Idea of North: Nordicity, Winterity. Nordlit 22: 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cowan, Geoffrey, and Nicholas J. Cull (eds.). 2008. Public Diplomacy in a Changing World. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 6–8.Google Scholar
  3. Dinnie, Keith. 2016. Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. The Guardian. 2014. Simon Anholt Interview: “There Is Only One Global Superpower: Public Opinion”, November 30. www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/nov/30/simon-anholt-good-country-party-global-superpower-public-opinion.
  5. Mikkelsen, Mai Klærke, Robert Christian Thomsen, and Peter Bakker (eds.). 2008. NACS/ANEC: Chronicle of Activities and Publications, 1997–2007. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
  6. Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  7. Olins, Wally. 2005. Making a National Brand. In The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, ed. Jan Melissen, 169–178. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pross, A. Paul. 1992. Group Politics and Public Policy. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations