Advertisement

Uncertain Embrace: The Rise and Fall of Canadian Studies Abroad as a Tool of Foreign Policy

  • Stephen BrooksEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy book series (GPD)

Abstract

The period since World War II has seen a dramatic increase in both country and regional studies across the world, and also in governments’ support of such studies and other forms of cultural diplomacy prompted by the belief that these soft power tools will promote their national interests and values. This chapter examines the causes within countries that contribute to the emergence and institutionalization of country or regional studies, including the differences between open and democratic societies in these factors. It then focuses on the factors that lead governments to support and promote the study of their country in other parts of the world. Particular stress is placed on the examples of the UK, France, the US, and China. The final section of the chapter examines the putative benefits that have derived from countries’ investments in this form of soft power. The chapter concludes that there is no guarantee that a government’s efforts to improve its country’s standing in other countries or regions of the world through support for the study of its country abroad will be successful and, moreover, that some of the premises that underlie the argument for such efforts warrant closer scrutiny.

References

  1. American Political Science Association. 2009. U.S. Standing in the World: Causes, Consequences, and the Future. http://www.apsanet.org/Portals/54/APSA%20Files/publications/TF_USStanding_Long_Final5.pdf.
  2. Arndt, Richard T. 2005. The First Resort of Kings: American Cultural Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century. Dulles: Brassey’s.Google Scholar
  3. British Council. 2017. The Art of Soft Power, December. https://www.britishcouncil.org/organisation/policy-insight-research/art-soft-pwer.
  4. Brooks, Stephen. 2016. Anti-Americanism and the Limits of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, David. 1996. Taking Stock: Canadian Studies in the Nineties. Montreal: Association for Canadian Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Canada, Department of External Affairs. 1970a. Foreign Policy for Canadians, Volume on Europe.Google Scholar
  7. Canada, Department of External Affairs. 1970b. Foreign Policy for Canadians, Volume on Pacific countries.Google Scholar
  8. Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2005a. A Role of Pride and Influence in the World.Google Scholar
  9. Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2005b. Evaluation of the International Academic Relations Program, July (n.p.). http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/about-a_propos/oig-big/2005/evaluation/relation_academic-academique.aspx?lang=eng.
  10. Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2010. 2009–10 Departmental Performance Report. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/dpr-rmr/2009-2010/inst/ext/extpr-eng.asp?format=print.
  11. Canada, Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations. 1940. Final Report.Google Scholar
  12. Canada, Royal Commission on National Developments in the Arts, Letters and Sciences. 1951. Final Report.Google Scholar
  13. Canada, Task Force on Program Review. 1986. Economic Growth: Culture and Communications, August. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 1996. What Border? The Americanization of Canada. First Broadcast, June 4.Google Scholar
  15. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 2012. How the World Sees Canada: Knowledgeable People Give Their Views, July 1. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/how-the-world-sees-canada-1.1130322.
  16. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 2013. Scholars, Authors, Wary of Government Review of Canadian History. CBC News, June 16. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/scholars-authors-wary-of-government-review-of-canadian-history-1.1377912.
  17. Cellucci, Paul. 2005. Unquiet Diplomacy. Toronto: Key Porter Books.Google Scholar
  18. Cull, Nicholas. 2006. Public Diplomacy Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. USC Center on Public Diplomacy Blog, April 18. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/public-diplomacy-gullion-evolution-phrase.
  19. Druick, Zoë. 2006. International Cultural Relations as a Factor in Postwar Canadian Cultural Policy: The Relevance of UNESCO for the Massey Commission. Canadian Journal of Communication 31 (1). http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php.journal/issue/view/114/showtoc.
  20. Fulbright, William J. 1989. The Price of Empire. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, John. 1976. Recent Growth of Interest in Canadian Studies Abroad. International Perspectives: Journal of Foreign Policy, n.p.Google Scholar
  22. Graham, John. 1999. Third Pillar or Fifth Wheel? International Education and Cultural Foreign Policy. In Canada Among Nations: A Big League Player, ed. Fen Osler Hampson, Michael Hart, and Martin Rudner. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Greene, Ian. n.d. Lessons Learned from Two Decades of Program Evaluation in Canada. http://www.yorku.ca/igreene/progeval.html.
  24. Goff, Patricia. 2017. Cultural Diplomacy. Oxford Bibliographies, April 27. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292–0202.xml.
  25. Halloran, Mary. 1996. Cultural Diplomacy in the Trudeau Era, 1968–1984. Ottawa: DFAIT.Google Scholar
  26. Hutchison, Bruce. 2010, first published in 1942. The Unknown Country: Canada and Her People. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. International Council for Canadian Studies. 2011. Brian Long Report. Internal Document Commissioned by DFAIT.Google Scholar
  28. International Council for Canadian Studies. 2016. Report on Activities of Member and Associate Member Associations. http://www.iccs-ciec.ca/iccs-reports.php.
  29. Japan Foundation. 2016. Annual Report, 2015–2016. http://www.jpf.go.jp/e/about/result/ar/2015/pdf/dl/ar2015e.pdf.
  30. Martin, Ged. 2010. Review of Canadian Studies in the New Millennium, ed. Patrick James and Mark Kasoff. Toronto: Published in 2008 by the University of Toronto Press. http://www.gedmartin.net/other-reviews-on-canadian-topics/211-patrick-james-and-mark-kasoff-eds-canadian-studies-in-the-new-millennium.
  31. Meren, David. 2013. With Friends Like These: Entangled Nationalisms and the Canada-Quebec-France Triangle, 1944–1970. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nye, Joseph. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Nye, Joseph. 2010. Soft Power and Cultural Diplomacy. Public Diplomacy Magazine, June 1. http://www.publicdiplomacymagazine.com/soft-power-and-cultural-diplomacy/.
  34. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Quebec, Commission of Inquiry on Constitutional Matters. 1956. Final Report.Google Scholar
  36. Rivera, Tim. 2015. Distinguishing Cultural Relations from Cultural Diplomacy: The British Council’s Relationship with Her Majesty’s Government. USC Center on Public Diplomacy. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/useruploads/u33041/Distinguishing%20Cultural%20Relations%20From%20Cultural%20Diplomacy%20-%20Full%20Version%20%281%29.pdf.
  37. Robarts Centre for Canadian Studies. 2012. Update on the Petition Against the Cuts to Canadian Studies Programmes and Associations Outside of Canada, York University. http://robarts.info.yorku.ca/2012/07/update-on-the-petition-against-the-cuts-to-canadian-studies-programmes-and-associations-outside-of-canada/.
  38. Rutherford, Paul. 2005. The Persistence of Britain: The Culture Project in Postwar Canada. In Canada and the End of Empire, ed. Phillip Buckner. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  39. Seib, Philip. 2010. Public Diplomacy and the Obama Moment, vol. II, no. 3. Layalina Productions, March. http://www.layalina.tv/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/2010-Mar-Philip-Seib.pdf.
  40. Sharma, Yojana. 2016. Universities Warned on ‘Pressure’ from Chinese Donors. University World News, June 7. http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20160915134221500.
  41. Symons, T.H.B. 1975. To Know Ourselves: The Report of the Commission on Canadian Studies, vol. II. Ottawa: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada.Google Scholar
  42. Trilokekar, R.D. 2007. Federalism, Foreign Policy and the Internationalization of Higher Education: A Case Study of the Department of Foreign Affairs. PhD thesis, York University.Google Scholar
  43. Trilokekar, Roopa Desai. 2015. From Soft Power to Economic Diplomacy? A Comparison of the Changing Rationales and Roles of the U.S. and Canadian Federal Governments in International Education. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley. http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/soft-power-economic-diplomacy-comparison-changing-rationales-and-roles-u-s-and-canadian.
  44. United States, Government Publishing Office. 1983. Public Law 98-164, November 22. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-97/pdf/STATUTE-97-Pg1017.pdf.
  45. United States, Department of State. 2017. Study of the US Institutes for Scholars. https://exchanges.state.gov/non-us/program/study-us-institutes-scholars.
  46. Wadland, John. 2014. Canadian Studies at 50: An Address to the Peterborough Historical Society. http://www.peterboroughhistoricalsociety.ca/userfiles/file/John%20Wadland%20Remarks.pdf.
  47. Wilson, V.S. 1988. What Legacy? The Neilsen Task Force Program Review. In Conservatives Heading into the Stretch, ed. Katherine Graham, 23–47. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations